Two-stent techniques for coronary bifurcation lesions (main vessel first versus side branch first): results from the COBIS (COronary BIfurcation Stenting) II registry

EuroIntervention 2017;13:835-842 published online May 2017. DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-16-01004

Taek Kyu Park
Taek Kyu Park1, MD; Young Bin Song1, MD; Jeong Hoon Yang1, MD; Joo Myung Lee1, MD; Joo-Yong Hahn1, MD; Seung-Hyuk Choi1, MD; Jin-Ho Choi1, MD; Sang Hoon Lee1, MD; Ju Hyeon Oh2, MD; Cheol Woong Yu3, MD; Jin-Ok Jeong4, MD; Hyeon-Cheol Gwon1*, MD
1. Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; 2. Samsung Changwon Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Cha

Aims: It has not been known which two-stent technique is best for treating bifurcation lesions. We aimed to compare the outcomes from main vessel (MV) first and side branch (SB) first tec

Sign in to read and download the full article

Forgot your password?

No account yet?
Sign up for free!

Create my pcr account

Join us for free and access thousands of articles from EuroIntervention, as well as presentations, videos, cases from

bifurcationclinical researchother technique
Coronary interventionsStents and scaffoldsBifurcation lesionsTools, devices and techniquesTools, devices and techniques
Read next article
Reduced periprocedural mortality and bleeding rates of radial approach in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Propensity score analysis of data from the ORPKI Polish National Registry

Latest news