Trends and predictors of radiation exposure in percutaneous coronary intervention: the PROTECTION VIII study

DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00856

Thomas Stocker
Thomas J. Stocker1,2,3, MD; Mohamed Abdel-Wahab4, MD; Helge Möllmann5, MD; Simon Deseive1,2, MD; Steffen Massberg1,2, MD; Jörg Hausleiter1,2,3, MD
1. Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I, Klinikum der Universität München, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany; 2. DZHK (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Munich Heart Alliance, Munich, Germany; 3. European Alliance for Medical Radiation Protection Research (EURAMED): The EURAMED rocc-n-roll project (www.euramed.eu); 4. Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany; 5. Department of Internal Medicine, Medizinische Klinik 1, St. Johannes-Hospital, Dortmund, Germany

Background: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is indispensable in cardiology; however, exposure to potentially harmful ionising radiation remains a concern.

Aims: This study was designed to assess the PCI-related radiation dose over the last decade and to identify predictors of increased dose exposure.

Methods: The PROcedural radiaTion dose Exposure in percutaneous Coronary intervenTION (PROTECTION VIII) study included all PCIs reported to a German quality assurance programme between 2008 and 2018. Dose area product (DAP) and radiation time were analysed. Effective dose (ED) was estimated (ED=DAP*k; conversion coefficient k=0.0022 mSv/cGy*cm2). Multivariate linear regression analysis was used to identify predictors associated with a clinically relevant increase of radiation dose (ED ≥1 mSv).

Results: We enrolled 3,704,986 patients undergoing PCI (median age 70 years, 30% female). Indications were chronic coronary syndrome (37.5%), unstable angina pectoris and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (non-STEMI; 33.2%) and STEMI (18.5%). Median DAP was 4,203 (interquartile range [IQR] 2,313-7,300) cGy*cm, ED was 9.2 mSv and median radiation time was 9.2 (IQR 5.8-15.0) min. Within the 10-year period, radiation exposure was reduced by 36% (p<0.001) and resulted in a median DAP of 3,070 cGy*cm (ED 6.8 mSv) in 2018. A significant 5.3-fold variability of median DAP was observed between catheterisation laboratories (p<0.001). We identified patient-related (gender, coronary artery bypass graft surgery, heart failure) and procedure-related (coronary occlusion PCI, ostial lesion PCI, left main PCI, multivessel PCI) predictors of increased radiation dose (all p<0.001).

Conclusions: This radiation dose survey demonstrates a considerable reduction of PCI radiation exposure during the last decade. However, large variability between catheterisation laboratories underlines the need for further radiation dose reduction.

Sign in to read and download the full article

Forgot your password?

No account yet?
Sign up for free!

Create my pcr account

Join us for free and access thousands of articles from EuroIntervention, as well as presentations, videos, cases from PCRonline.com

acs/nste-acsmiscellaneousradiation protectionstable anginastemi
Read next article
Three-year outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation for bicuspid versus tricuspid aortic stenosis

Latest news