DOI: 10.4244/EIJV10I5A111

Tools & Techniques - Clinical: Management of coronary perforation

Iwan Harries, MD; Adam Graham, MD; Steve Ramcharitar*, MD, FESC, FACC

In this chapter of Tools and Techniques Clinical, management of coronary perforation in the cardiac catheter laboratory is discussed. The following is a summarised overview of this technique. The complete, unabridged version with images is available online at: http://www.pcronline.com/eurointervention/76th_issue/111.

Background

Coronary perforation is a rare (pooled incidence: 0.43%, 95% confidence interval: 0.35-0.52%)1 but serious complication of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) that is associated with significant morbidity and mortality (Figure 1). Clinical and procedural predictors of coronary perforation are well described (Table 1).

Figure 1. Ellis classification of perforations2.

Management

Management is dependent upon the Ellis classification. The primary aim is to seal the perforation and prevent cardiac tamponade.

Haemodynamic compromise should be treated with resuscitation; evidence of cardiac tamponade should be sought. If tamponade is confirmed, pericardiocentesis should be performed, preferably guided by transthoracic echocardiography. European Society of Cardiology guidelines describe signs, symptoms and management of cardiac tamponade4. Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors should be discontinued on recognition of coronary perforation because their use may be associated with increased risk of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and greater difficulty in achieving haemostasis5. Intravenous heparin can be reversed with intravenous protamine sulphate (1 mg of intravenous protamine sulphate neutralises 80-100 units of heparin [max. dose 50 mg]).

Figure 2. Algorithmic management of coronary perforation3.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Volume 10 Number 5
Sep 28, 2014
Volume 10 Number 5
View full issue


Key metrics

Suggested by Cory

10.4244/EIJV8I1A23 May 15, 2012
How should I treat guidewire-induced distal coronary perforation?
Senguttuvan N et al
free

CLINICAL RESEARCH

10.4244/EIJ-D-16-01038 Aug 4, 2017
Prevalence and outcomes of coronary artery perforation during percutaneous coronary intervention
Guttmann O et al
free

10.4244/EIJV10I61A131 Oct 20, 2014
How should I treat an accidentally misplaced 8 Fr drainage catheter in the right ventricle?
Bakos Z and Harnek J
free

10.4244/EIJV12SXA6 May 16, 2016
Coronary-cameral fistulas: indications and methods for closure
Carminati M et al
free

IMAGE IN CARDIOLOGY

10.4244/EIJ-D-16-00302 Jan 20, 2017
Coronary artery pseudoaneurysm formed after stuck rotablator: IVUS and MDCT findings
Kaneko U et al
free

Jan 15, 2010
Femoral artery puncture
Haude M et al
free

TECHNICAL REPORT

10.4244/EIJV10I11A220 Mar 20, 2015
A novel homemade snare, safe, economical and size-adjustable
Yokoi K et al
free
Trending articles
153.65

Clinical research

10.4244/EIJ-D-20-01125 Oct 20, 2021
An upfront combined strategy for endovascular haemostasis in transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation
Costa G et al
free
54.9

Expert review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-01010 Jun 24, 2022
Device-related thrombus following left atrial appendage occlusion
Simard T et al
free
43.75

Clinical Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-01091 Aug 5, 2022
Lifetime management of patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis: a computed tomography simulation study
Medranda G et al
free
X

The Official Journal of EuroPCR and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI)

EuroPCR EAPCI
PCR ESC
Impact factor: 7.6
2023 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2024)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2024 Europa Group - All rights reserved