LETTER TO THE EDITOR

Stenosis severity indices cannot reflect lumen loss in stent trials

EuroIntervention 2018;14:838. DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-17-01073L

Francesco Lauri
Francesco Maria Lauri*, MD; Fernando Macaya, MD; Hernán Mejía-Rentería, MD
Department of Cardiology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, IDISSC, Madrid, Spain


We read with interest the article from Asano et al1 reporting the functional equivalence, as measured by quantitative flow ratio (QFR, a novel adenosine-free angiography-based fractional flow reserve [FFR]), of two tested stents. This is a substudy of the simultaneously published PIONEER randomised trial2, which failed to demonstrate non-inferiority in terms of late lumen loss of a novel sirolimus-eluting stent with a biodegradable PLGA-polymer coating and an electrografting base layer on a thin-strut (80 µm) cobalt-chromium platform (BuMA™; SINOMED, Tianjin, China) when compared to the contemporary durable polymer zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES). The rate of restenosis (>50%) and 12-month clinical endpoints ...

Sign in to read and download the full article

Forgot your password?

No account yet?
Sign up for free!

Create my pcr account

Join us for free and access thousands of articles from EuroIntervention, as well as presentations, videos, cases from PCRonline.com

Read next article
Reply to the letter to the editor “Stenosis severity indices cannot reflect lumen loss in stent trials”

Latest news