The Official Journal of EuroPCR and the European Association of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions (EAPCI)

Clinical research

Risk-benefit trade-offs in revascularisation choices

EuroIntervention 2011;6:936-941.

1. School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; 2. Department of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; 3. Thoraxcenter, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands; 4. Department

Aims: When patients choose percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) over coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), they accept an increased long-term risk of repeat revascularisation in excha

Sign in to read and download the full article

Forgot your password?
No account yet? Sign up for free!
Create my pcr account

Join us for free and access thousands of articles from EuroIntervention, as well as presentations, videos, cases from

Read next article

An integer based risk score for predicting 30-day major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events after percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents: results from a large prospective multicentre registry, the STENT Group