DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-20-00924R

Reply: How should coronary computed tomography angiography co-registration be applied in the chronic total occlusion hybrid algorithm?

Iosif Xenogiannis1, MD, PhD; Emmanouil S. Brilakis1, MD, PhD

We are grateful for the insightful comments of Drs Opolski and Knaapen1. While we agree that there are multiple limitations of the existing CTA co-registration system, we would like to highlight the following:

1. “Intra-CTO wire advancement” refers to advancement within the vessel architecture (either intraplaque or subintimally) and not necessarily intraplaque. Intraplaque wire advancement cannot currently be ascertained using CTA co-registration due to low spatial resolution and limitations of the co-registered images. CTA co-registration can, however, help to determine whether the guidewire is advancing in the expected vessel course or whether it has entered a side branch or a coronary bypass graft.

2. The precision of co-registration is indeed low due to inaccuracies in centreline positioning and motion artefacts. In our practice, we rotate between the co-registered and non-co-registered images continually throughout the case to facilitate visualisation of the CTO PCI equipment and the coronary tree. Projecting the co-registered images in another monitor is an excellent solution to prevent a “crowded” fluoroscopy screen!

3. We agree that coronary CTA is an outstanding modality for clarifying proximal cap ambiguity and the presence and extent of calcification within and proximal or distal to the occlusion that can facilitate re-entry. The Asia Pacific Chronic Total Occlusion Club suggests that preprocedural coronary CTA should be considered in cases with a high J-CTO score, previous coronary artery bypass grafting, and previous failure2.

4. In our study, ADR was used in 52% (14/27) of the cases, which is higher than the 28% utilisation in a recent publication from the PROGRESS-CTO registry3,4. CTA co-registration with real-time fluoroscopy assisted with resolution of proximal cap ambiguity in 9 cases, guided intra-CTO wire advancement in 7 cases and facilitated re-entry in 2 cases. In the present study, ADR led to successful lesion crossing in 71% (10/14) of the cases in which it was used, whereas, according to prior data derived from the PROGRESS-CTO registry, ADR achieved successful lesion crossing in 60% (269/451) of the cases where it was applied5. The J-CTO score was higher in patients with CTA co-registration with real-time fluoroscopy-guided ADR in comparison with our prior data on angiography-only-guided ADR (3.5±0.8 vs 2.8±1.2, respectively), suggesting that CTA co-registration with real-time fluoroscopy may improve the success of ADR.

Coronary CTA has been shown to improve prediction of the outcomes of CTO PCI compared with the use of angiographic parameters and can facilitate procedural planning6. CTO co-registration is still in the early stages of development but carries great promise for further improving what can be achieved in these often complex and challenging procedures.

Conflict of interest statement

E. Brilakis has received consulting/speaker honoraria from Abbott Vascular, American Heart Association (associate editor Circulation), Amgen, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Cardiovascular Innovations Foundation (Board of Directors), ControlRad, CSI, Ebix, Elsevier, GE Healthcare, InfraRedx, Medtronic, Siemens, and Teleflex; research support from Regeneron and Siemens; is the owner of Hippocrates LLC and a shareholder of MHI Ventures. I. Xenogiannis has no conflicts of interest to declare.

Supplementary data

To read the full content of this article, please download the PDF.


References

Volume 16 Number 16
Mar 19, 2021
Volume 16 Number 16
View full issue


Key metrics

Suggested by Cory

State of the art

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-01117 Sep 20, 2022
Recanalisation of coronary chronic total occlusions
Di Mario C et al
free

10.4244/EIJV15I18A286 Apr 3, 2020
Chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention scores: present and future
Vemmou E et al
free

10.4244/EIJV15I2A27 Jun 20, 2019
Chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention: the road ahead
Brilakis E et al
free

10.4244/EIJV12I11A218 Dec 9, 2016
Conquering CTO revascularisation: the summit is near with 90% of the ascent behind us
Di Mario C and Dini C
free
Trending articles
318.3

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00695 Nov 19, 2021
Transcatheter treatment for tricuspid valve disease
Praz F et al
free
116.85

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00066 Apr 21, 2025
Management of complications after valvular interventions
Bansal A et al
free
108.3

Viewpoint

10.4244/EIJ-E-22-00007 May 15, 2022
TAVI at 20: how a crazy idea led to a clinical revolution
Eltchaninoff H et al
free
91.6

Image – Interventional flashlight

10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00344 Aug 5, 2022
First dedicated transcatheter leaflet splitting device: the ShortCut device
Tchétché D et al
free
72.15

State-of-the-art

10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00627 Feb 6, 2023
Left atrial appendage occlusion
Holmes D et al
free
68.9

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00992 Sep 15, 2025
Antithrombotic therapy in complex percutaneous coronary intervention
Castiello D et al
free
49.55

CLINICAL RESEARCH

10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00962 Apr 6, 2018
A new optical coherence tomography-based calcium scoring system to predict stent underexpansion
Fujino A et al
free
42.95

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00145 Sep 20, 2021
Robotics, imaging, and artificial intelligence in the catheterisation laboratory
Beyar R et al
free
X

PCR
Impact factor: 9.5
2024 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2025)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2025 Europa Group - All rights reserved