Research Correspondence

DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00702

Redo-TAVI feasibility and coronary accessibility following index TAVI with the Evolut valve in patients with bicuspid aortic valve stenosis

Ketina Arslani1,2, MD; Gabriela Tirado-Conte1,3, MD; Nicolas M. Van Mieghem4, MD, PhD; Darren Mylotte5, MD, PhD; Gilbert H.L. Tang6, MD, MSc, MBA; Vinayak N. Bapat7, MBBB, MCh; Lionel Leroux8, MD, PhD; Didier Tchétché9, MD, PhD; Kendra J. Grubb10, MD; Ole De Backer1, MD, PhD

With an increasing choice of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) to treat younger aortic valve stenosis (AS) patients, it can be anticipated that (1) TAVI will be used more often to treat bicuspid AS, as the latter is more often encountered in young patients, and (2) there will be an increasing need for redo-TAVI in the future. In general, there is more limited evidence on the performance of TAVI in bicuspid AS, as this has been kept out of the large randomised trials. Still, there are relatively good registry data on the safety and efficacy of TAVI with the balloon-expandable SAPIEN (Edwards Lifesciences) and self-expanding Evolut (Medtronic) transcatheter aortic valves (TAVs) to treat severe bicuspid AS12. Unfortunately, there are no data available on redo-TAVI feasibility in patients with bicuspid AS. Redo-TAVI in the self-expanding Evolut can present challenges because of the supra-annular leaflet position, which may result in a higher functional neoskirt in case of redo-TAVI. This study aimed to assess redo-TAVI feasibility and coronary accessibility following index TAVI with an Evolut TAV in patients with bicuspid AS...

Sign in to read
the full article

Forgot your password?
No account yet?
Sign up for free!

Create my pcr account

Join us for free and access thousands of articles from EuroIntervention, as well as presentations, videos, cases from PCRonline.com

Volume 20 Number 22
Nov 18, 2024
Volume 20 Number 22
View full issue


Key metrics

Suggested by Cory

AORTIC VALVE INTERVENTIONS

10.4244/EIJV12SYA10 Sep 18, 2016
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in bicuspid aortic valve stenosis
Perlman G et al
free

Debate

10.4244/EIJ-E-22-00042 Nov 18, 2022
TAVI in younger patients with bicuspid aortic stenosis: pros and cons
Blackman D et al
free

Editorial

10.4244/EIJ-E-23-00037 Aug 21, 2023
Bicuspid is different
Bleiziffer S
free

10.4244/EIJV11SWA27 Sep 17, 2015
Patient selection for TAVI 2015 - TAVI in low-risk patients: fact or fiction?
Haussig S and Linke A
free

10.4244/EIJV14I3A40 Jun 14, 2018
TAVI: a country for old men. Is this durable?
Mylotte D
free

Clinical Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00734 Jun 24, 2022
Three-year outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation for bicuspid versus tricuspid aortic stenosis
Zhou D et al
free
Trending articles
153.65

Clinical research

10.4244/EIJ-D-20-01125 Oct 20, 2021
An upfront combined strategy for endovascular haemostasis in transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation
Costa G et al
free
54.9

Expert review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-01010 Jun 24, 2022
Device-related thrombus following left atrial appendage occlusion
Simard T et al
free
43.25

Clinical Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-01091 Aug 5, 2022
Lifetime management of patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis: a computed tomography simulation study
Medranda G et al
free
X

The Official Journal of EuroPCR and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI)

EuroPCR EAPCI
PCR ESC
Impact factor: 7.6
2023 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2024)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2024 Europa Group - All rights reserved