Coronary interventions

Prognostic impact of multivessel versus culprit vessel only percutaneous intervention for patients with multivessel coronary artery disease presenting with acute coronary syndrome

EuroIntervention 2015;11:293-300 published online ahead of print August 2014. DOI: 10.4244/EIJY14M08_05

Ahmed Hassanin
Ahmed Hassanin1, MD; Sorin J. Brener2,4*, MD; Alexandra J. Lansky3, MD; Ke Xu2, PhD; Gregg W. Stone2,5, MD
1. Morristown Medical Center, Morristown, NJ, USA; 2. Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY, USA; 3. Yale University Medical Center, New Haven, CT, USA; 4. New York Methodist Hospital, Brooklyn, NY, USA; 5. Columbia University Medical Center, N

Aims: To determine whether multivessel (MV) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) performed in one procedure improves outcomes when compared to single-vessel (SV) PCI for the culprit l

Sign in to read and download the full article

Forgot your password?

No account yet?
Sign up for free!

Create my pcr account

Join us for free and access thousands of articles from EuroIntervention, as well as presentations, videos, cases from PCRonline.com

multivessel coronary artery diseasenon-st-segment acute coronary syndromesoutcomepercutaneous coronary intervention
Read next article
Geographic miss with aorto-ostial coronary stent implantation: insights from high-resolution coronary computed tomography angiography

Latest news