Image – Interventional flashlight

DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-18-00794

Percutaneous treatment of anterior mitral leaflet perforation using an AMPLATZER Septal Occluder

Claudia Tiburtius*, MD; Julian Witt, MD; Joachim Schofer, MD, PhD

Figure 1. Mitral valve before and after intervention. A) TEE before procedure with perforation of the anterior mitral leaflet. B) TEE after procedure with occluder in the anterior mitral leaflet.

Anterior mitral leaflet perforation is a rare complication of an aortic valve replacement, typically located at the base of the leaflet1. Here we describe the case of a 69-year-old female patient who had mechanical aortic valve replacement in 2000 and bioprosthesis reimplantation because of mechanical valve dysfunction in 2017. After surgery she remained symptomatic (heart failure of NYHA Class III) because of severe mitral regurgitation due to a perforation of the anterior mitral leaflet at the base of the A2 segment caused by surgery (Figure 1A, Moving image 1). Preprocedural laboratory tests revealed haemoglobin of 11 g/dl, LDH of 413 U/l and NT-proBNP of 872 pg/ml. Endocarditis was excluded. Because of the high risk of re-reoperation and other risk factors for surgery, the Heart Team decided to attempt a percutaneous closure. After right femoral vein and transseptal puncture, a steerable sheath (Agilis™; St. Jude Medical, St. Paul, MN, USA) loaded with a 5 Fr right coronary Judkins catheter (Cordis, Milpitas, CA, USA) was used to cross the perforation with a soft J-tip Terumo guidewire (Terumo Europe, Leuven, Belgium) with 3D TEE guidance. The defect was measured in 2D to be 6x6 mm and in 3D 0.35 cm2. Over a stiff wire the Agilis sheath was exchanged for a 6 Fr Cook sheath (Cook Medical, Bloomington, IN, USA), and a 10 mm AMPLATZER™ Septal Occluder (St. Jude Medical) was implanted into the perforation, which resulted in complete sealing of the perforation (Figure 1B, Moving image 2, Moving image 3). Echocardiography confirmed normal mitral leaflet motion (Moving image 4, Moving image 5). The ventricular part of the occluder neither disturbed the aortic bioprosthesis nor created a significant pressure gradient in the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) (11 mmHg; total transvalvular gradient 13 mmHg). Procedure time was 60 minutes. One-month echocardiographic follow-up revealed a stable occluder position with complete sealing of the defect. Heart failure improved to NYHA Class II; heart failure self-assessment changed from 9/10 at baseline to 5/10 after three months. LDH decreased to 291 U/l and NT-proBNP to 411 pg/ml.

Others have used an occluder to seal a perforation of the posterior mitral leaflet, where the ventricular part of the device is not positioned in the LVOT2. Here we demonstrate that percutaneous closure can also be performed in case of anterior mitral leaflet perforation, where part of the occluder has to be placed into the LVOT.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Supplementary data

To read the full content of this article, please download the PDF.

Moving image 1. Preprocedural regurgitation, TEE 2D long-axis view with colour Doppler.

Moving image 2. Occluder positioning, fluoroscopy.

Moving image 3. Post-procedural regurgitation, TEE 2D longaxis view with colour Doppler.

Moving image 4. Occluder positioned, TEE 2D long-axis view.

Moving image 5. Occluder positioned, TEE 3D en face view.

Volume 14 Number 12
Dec 20, 2018
Volume 14 Number 12
View full issue


Key metrics

Suggested by Cory

Image – Interventional flashlight

10.4244/EIJ-D-19-01064 Feb 5, 2021
Transcatheter mitral valve repair in a patient with prior atrial septal defect occlusion
Niikura H et al
free

IMAGE IN CARDIOLOGY

10.4244/EIJV11I2A43 Jun 19, 2015
Device embolisation after transcatheter paravalvular leak closure
Cruz-González I et al
free

10.4244/EIJV15I6A87 Aug 9, 2019
Patching residual leaks following a MitraClip procedure
Kar S and Sharma R
free

INTERVENTIONAL FLASHLIGHT

10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00789 Feb 2, 2018
Residual “inter-clip” regurgitation due to a partial detachment, treated with AMPLATZER Vascular Plug II implantation
Danduch L et al
free
Trending articles
318.1

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00695 Nov 19, 2021
Transcatheter treatment for tricuspid valve disease
Praz F et al
free
117

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00066 Apr 21, 2025
Management of complications after valvular interventions
Bansal A et al
free
108.3

Viewpoint

10.4244/EIJ-E-22-00007 May 15, 2022
TAVI at 20: how a crazy idea led to a clinical revolution
Eltchaninoff H et al
free
91.6

Image – Interventional flashlight

10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00344 Aug 5, 2022
First dedicated transcatheter leaflet splitting device: the ShortCut device
Tchétché D et al
free
71.8

State-of-the-art

10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00627 Feb 6, 2023
Left atrial appendage occlusion
Holmes D et al
free
68.9

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00992 Sep 15, 2025
Antithrombotic therapy in complex percutaneous coronary intervention
Castiello D et al
free
60.65

Clinical research

10.4244/EIJ-D-20-01155 Oct 20, 2021
A deep learning algorithm for detecting acute myocardial infarction
Liu W et al
free
58.95

Clinical research

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00344 Sep 18, 2023
Clinical outcomes of TAVI with the Myval balloon-expandable valve for non-calcified aortic regurgitation
Sanchez-Luna JP et al
free
57.25

Expert Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-00201 Oct 10, 2025
Drug-coated balloons for coronary bifurcation lesions
Fezzi S et al
free
57.25

Expert Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-00201 Oct 20, 2025
Drug-coated balloons for coronary bifurcation lesions
Fezzi S et al
free
X

PCR
Impact factor: 9.5
2024 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2025)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2025 Europa Group - All rights reserved