Percutaneous coronary intervention versus bypass surgery for left main coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis of randomised trials

EuroIntervention 2011;7:738-746 publish online ahead of print August 2011. DOI: 10.4244/EIJV7I6A117

Giuseppe Ferrante1*, MD, PhD; Patrizia Presbitero1, MD; Marco Valgimigli2, MD, PhD; Marie-Claude Morice3, MD; Paolo Pagnotta1, MD; Guido Belli1, MD; Elena Corrada1, MD; Yoshinobu Onuma4, MD, PhD; Peter Barlis5, MBBS, MPH, PhD; Didier Locca6, MD; Eric Eeckhout6, MD, PhD; Carlo Di Mario7, MD, PhD; Patrick W. Serruys4, MD, PhD

1. Department of Interventional Cardiology, Istituto clinico Humanitas IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy; 2. Cardiovascular Institute, Arcispedale S. Anna, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy; 3. Institut Cardiovasculaire Paris Sud, Instit

Aims: We performed a meta-analysis of randomised trials comparing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with stent implantation to coronary artery bypass grafting (CAB

Forgot your password?

No account yet? Sign up for free!

Create my pcr account

Join us for free and access thousands of articles from EuroIntervention, as well as presentations, videos, cases from PCRonline.com

percutaneous coronary interventioncoronary artery bypass graft surgeryleft main coronary artery disease

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin

Percutaneous coronary intervention versus bypass surgery for left main coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis of randomised trials

Read next article

Latest news

Coronary

Valvular disease

Heart failure

Peripheral

Hypertension

Stroke