Aims: To compare the intravascular ultrasonography (IVUS) findings between saphenous vein grafts (SVG) treated with paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) vs. bare metal stents
Omar M. Jeroudi1,2, BA; Abdul-Rahman R. Abdel-Karim1,2, MD; Tesfaldet T. Michael1,2, MD; Christopher Lichtenwalter1,2, MD; James A. de Lemos1,2, MD; Owen Obel1,2, MD; Tayo Addo1,2, MD; Michele Roesle1, RN; Donald Haagen1, RCIS; Bavana V. Rangan1, BDS, MPH; Deepa Raghunathan1,2; Monica DaSilva1,2; Bilal Saeed3, MD; Joseph K. Bissett4, MD; Rajesh Sachdeva4, MD; Vassilios V. Voudris5, MD, PhD; Panagiotis Karyofillis5, MD; Biswajit Kar6, MD; James Rossen
1. Veteran Affairs North Texas Healthcare System, Dallas, TX, USA; 2. University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; 3. Department of Internal Medicine, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, USA; 4. Central Arkansas Veter
Sign in to read and download the full articleForgot your password?
No account yet? Sign up for free!Create my pcr account
Join us for free and access thousands of articles from EuroIntervention, as well as presentations, videos, cases from PCRonline.com
saphenous vein graftintravascular ultrasonographypaclitaxel-eluting stentneointimal hyperplasia
Read next articleFilter no-reflow during percutaneous coronary intervention of saphenous vein grafts: incidence, predictors and effect of the type of protection device