INTERVENTIONAL FLASHLIGHT

DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00815

Non-invasive treatment planning of tandem coronary artery lesions using an interactive planner for PCI

Jeroen Sonck1*, MD; Yosuke Miyazaki2, MD, PhD; Damien Mandry3, MD, PhD; Daniele Andreini4, MD, PhD

Figure 1. Assessment of PCI planner. A) Coronary angiography of right coronary artery. B) MSCT image of right coronary artery. C) Assessment of FFRCT. Target lesions are indicated by arrows. D-G) Assessment of PCI planner for each PCI plan. Stent location marked by dotted line. AS: area stenosis; DS: diameter stenosis; MLA: minimum lumen area; MLD: minimum lumen diameter; MSCT: multislice computed tomography; PCI: percutaneous coronary intervention; RVA: reference vessel area; RVD: reference vessel diameter

Fractional flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomography angiography (FFRCT) is a non-invasive technique providing lesion-specific FFR calculations based on blood flow simulations using patient-specific three-dimensional (3D) geometries1. FFRCT has been shown to have a high diagnostic accuracy compared to invasive FFR2. Kim et al previously showed that FFRCT could be accurately modelled after updates to the 3D geometry, but this was an offline process requiring time-consuming manual geometric changes3.

The Interactive Planner (HeartFlow, Inc., Redwood City, CA, USA) is computer software enabling prediction of changes in FFRCT subsequent to virtual removal of coronary artery stenoses. This technology is based on a novel geometric modelling technique to enable physicians to update the luminal geometry efficiently and employ a rapid blood flow solver to compute changes in FFRCT in the updated geometry. Changes made to the patient model can be readily visualised and compared alongside the pre-intervention result.

In the SYNTAX III trial, Heart Teams are randomised to coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) or conventional angiography for decision making and treatment planning in stable complex coronary artery disease (CAD), making this an ideal study for gathering data for testing this Interactive Planner4.

We present the case of a 52-year-old male patient enrolled in SYNTAX III with a CTA-derived SYNTAX score of 36 and a SYNTAX score II with equipoise risk for surgery or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) who presented with serial lesions in the right coronary artery (RCA) (Figure 1A, Figure 1B). The proximal lesion, consisting of a partially calcified plaque, generated an FFRCT drop of 0.24 leading to an FFRCT of 0.73. There were two other serial non-calcified lesions in the mid and distal RCA (Figure 1A-Figure 1C).

Four stenting strategies were evaluated (Figure 1D-Figure 1G). In each of the strategies, proximal and distal reference segments were identified and the luminal geometry was restored to match the reference diameters at those locations and transition smoothly in between. Virtual stenting of the proximal lesion alone or in combination with the distal lesion leads to an FFRCT of 0.79 and 0.81, respectively (Figure 1D-Figure 1G). The virtual stenting of the lesions in the proximal and mid RCA (Figure 1E, two stents) or of all three lesions (Figure 1F, three stents) leads to comparable results with predicted FFRCT of 0.83 or 0.85. We recommended the strategy shown in Figure 1E. As demonstrated by this case example, the HeartFlow Interactive Planner technology has the potential to refine procedural strategy and improve patients’ outcomes.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Volume 14 Number 8
Oct 19, 2018
Volume 14 Number 8
View full issue


Key metrics

Suggested by Cory

Clinical research

10.4244/EIJ-D-18-00668 Oct 18, 2019
Personalised fractional flow reserve: a novel concept to optimise myocardial revascularisation
Gosling R et al
free

10.4244/EIJV11SVA11 May 19, 2015
Image-based assessment of fractional flow reserve
Tu S et al
free

10.4244/EIJV9I2A44 Jun 28, 2013
Virtual fractional flow reserve by coronary computed tomography - hope or hype?
Rajani R et al
free

EXPERT REVIEW

10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00465 Aug 25, 2017
State of the art: coronary angiography
Collet C et al
free

Original Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00010 Oct 7, 2024
Prediction of fractional flow reserve using intravascular ultrasound
Okubo M et al
free
Trending articles
87.2

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-00266 Jan 19, 2026
Lesion stratification with intracoronary imaging
McGarvey M et al
free
47.45

NEW INNOVATION

10.4244/EIJ-D-15-00467 Feb 20, 2018
Design and principle of operation of the HeartMate PHP (percutaneous heart pump)
Van Mieghem NM et al
free
34.8

Original Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-01006 Mar 16, 2026
Clinical outcomes and haemodynamic response after blinded stress assessment of moderate aortic stenosis
Eerdekens R et al
22.2

Viewpoint

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-01066 May 4, 2026
Intracoronary imaging guidance for de novo coronary lesion treatment with drug-coated balloons
Amabile N et al
free
20.75

Flashlight

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-01014 Apr 6, 2026
Stent retriever-assisted coronary thrombectomy with continuous aspiration
Liabot Q et al
open access
19.5

Original Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-26-00032 May 15, 2026
Glucocorticoids to reduce permanent pacemaker implantation after TAVI: the GLUCO-TAVI randomised trial
Fuertes-Kenneally L et al
17.8

Expert Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-01316 Apr 20, 2026
Electrosurgical laceration and stabilisation of tricuspid edge-to-edge repair: the ELASTA-T technique
Alvarez-Covarrubias H et al
free
X

PCR
Impact factor: 9.5
2024 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2025)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2026 Europa Group - All rights reserved