Flashlight

DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00871

Management of bioprosthetic valve failure at 10 years after TAV-in-SAV

Julius Jelisejevas1,2, MD; John G. Webb-1,3, MD; David A. Wood1,2, MD

Structural deterioration of bioprosthetic heart valves, manifesting as stenosis and/or regurgitation, remains the primary factor limiting valve longevity. As patients undergoing valve replacement have increasingly longer life expectancies, planning lifelong management is essential1. This trend also highlights the need to balance surgical and transcatheter options in redo procedures, which is an evolving conversation in which transcatheter options may offer a less invasive alternative to surgery2. Here, we report a challenging case in the lifelong management of aortic valve disease of a 66-year-old female with significant comorbidities, including chronic kidney disease, end-stage liver disease, and a complex cardiac history.

The patient was initially treated at the age of 47 due to native aortic valve endocarditis, necessitating surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) with a 21 mm Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT (Edwards Lifesciences). The procedure involved root enlargement and congenital ventricular septal defect repair, complicated by coagulopathy, leading to a prolonged hospital stay but a favourable overall outcome. Nine years later, at age 56, she underwent a transcatheter aortic valve-in-surgical aortic valve (TAV-in-SAV) procedure, owing to the risk of coronary obstruction and sinus sequestration...

Sign in to read
the full article

Forgot your password?
No account yet?
Sign up for free!

Create my pcr account

Join us for free and access thousands of articles from EuroIntervention, as well as presentations, videos, cases from PCRonline.com

Volume 21 Number 8
Apr 21, 2025
Volume 21 Number 8
View full issue


Key metrics

Suggested by Cory

10.4244/EIJV9SSA15 Sep 15, 2013
Failing surgical bioprosthesis in aortic and mitral position
Mylotte D et al
free

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00157 Oct 20, 2021
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in degenerated surgical aortic valves
Tarantini G et al
free

EXPERT REVIEW

10.4244/EIJ-D-18-00667 Sep 7, 2018
Novel strategies in aortic valve-in-valve therapy including bioprosthetic valve fracture and BASILICA
Dvir D et al
free

10.4244/EIJV11SWA34 Sep 17, 2015
Durability of devices: long-term results and clinical outcomes
Arsalan M and Mack MJ
free

10.4244/EIJV14I2A24 Jun 20, 2018
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: don’t forget the coronary arteries!
Søndergaard L and De Backer O
free
Trending articles
56.85

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00386 Feb 3, 2025
Mechanical circulatory support for complex, high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention
Ferro E et al
free
39.45

Clinical research

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00725 Nov 19, 2023
A systematic algorithm for large-bore arterial access closure after TAVI: the TAVI-MultiCLOSE study
Rosseel L et al
free
39.45

Original Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00725 Mar 18, 2024
A systematic algorithm for large-bore arterial access closure after TAVI: the TAVI-MultiCLOSE study
Rosseel L et al
free
36.25

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00448 Jan 15, 2024
Coronary spasm and vasomotor dysfunction as a cause of MINOCA
Yaker ZS et al
free
35.15

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00895 Apr 1, 2024
Percutaneous interventions for pulmonary embolism
Finocchiaro S et al
free
28.5

CLINICAL RESEARCH

10.4244/EIJV11I1A6 May 19, 2015
European expert consensus on rotational atherectomy
Barbato E et al
free
15.95

Debate

10.4244/EIJ-E-24-00072 Mar 17, 2025
Routine diagnosis of ANOCA/INOCA: pros and cons
Montone R et al
free
X

The Official Journal of EuroPCR and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI)

EuroPCR EAPCI
PCR ESC
Impact factor: 7.6
2023 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2024)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2025 Europa Group - All rights reserved