Flashlight

DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00871

Management of bioprosthetic valve failure at 10 years after TAV-in-SAV

Julius Jelisejevas1,2, MD; John G. Webb-1,3, MD; David A. Wood1,2, MD

Structural deterioration of bioprosthetic heart valves, manifesting as stenosis and/or regurgitation, remains the primary factor limiting valve longevity. As patients undergoing valve replacement have increasingly longer life expectancies, planning lifelong management is essential1. This trend also highlights the need to balance surgical and transcatheter options in redo procedures, which is an evolving conversation in which transcatheter options may offer a less invasive alternative to surgery2. Here, we report a challenging case in the lifelong management of aortic valve disease of a 66-year-old female with significant comorbidities, including chronic kidney disease, end-stage liver disease, and a complex cardiac history.

The patient was initially treated at the age of 47 due to native aortic valve endocarditis, necessitating surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) with a 21 mm Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT (Edwards Lifesciences). The procedure involved root enlargement and congenital ventricular septal defect repair, complicated by coagulopathy, leading to a prolonged hospital stay but a favourable overall outcome. Nine years later, at age 56, she underwent a transcatheter aortic valve-in-surgical aortic valve (TAV-in-SAV) procedure, owing to the risk of coronary obstruction and sinus sequestration...

Sign in to read
the full article

Forgot your password?
No account yet?
Sign up for free!

Create my pcr account

Join us for free and access thousands of articles from EuroIntervention, as well as presentations, videos, cases from PCRonline.com

Volume 21 Number 8
Apr 21, 2025
Volume 21 Number 8
View full issue


Key metrics

Suggested by Cory

10.4244/EIJV9SSA15 Sep 15, 2013
Failing surgical bioprosthesis in aortic and mitral position
Mylotte D et al
free

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00157 Oct 20, 2021
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in degenerated surgical aortic valves
Tarantini G et al
free

EXPERT REVIEW

10.4244/EIJ-D-18-00667 Sep 7, 2018
Novel strategies in aortic valve-in-valve therapy including bioprosthetic valve fracture and BASILICA
Dvir D et al
free

10.4244/EIJV11SWA34 Sep 17, 2015
Durability of devices: long-term results and clinical outcomes
Arsalan M and Mack MJ
free

10.4244/EIJV14I2A24 Jun 20, 2018
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: don’t forget the coronary arteries!
Søndergaard L and De Backer O
free
Trending articles
96.55

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00066 Apr 21, 2025
Management of complications after valvular interventions
Bansal A et al
free
66.9

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00992 Sep 15, 2025
Antithrombotic therapy in complex percutaneous coronary intervention
Castiello D et al
free
56.6

Original Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-00331 May 21, 2025
One-month dual antiplatelet therapy followed by prasugrel monotherapy at a reduced dose: the 4D-ACS randomised trial
Jang Y et al
open access
56.6

Original Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-00331 Jul 21, 2025
One-month dual antiplatelet therapy followed by prasugrel monotherapy at a reduced dose: the 4D-ACS randomised trial
Jang Y et al
open access
35.45

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00448 Jan 15, 2024
Coronary spasm and vasomotor dysfunction as a cause of MINOCA
Yaker ZS et al
free
X

PCR
Impact factor: 9.5
2024 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2025)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2025 Europa Group - All rights reserved