Image – Interventional flashlight

DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-19-00688

Fenestration of an aortic endovascular graft using an electrified coronary guidewire

Dmitriy S. Sulimov1, MD; Steffen Desch1, MD

Figure 1. Steps of the procedure and the result. A) Angiography of the left subclavian artery. B) Telescopic system of the wire in the PiggyBack in the JR4 diagnostic catheter. C) Guidewire penetration through the stent graft fabric. D) Wire connected to electrosurgery pencil using a needle driver outside of the patient’s body. E) Stent enhancement imaging after stent implantation in the left subclavian artery through the fenestration. F) CT angiography after the procedure.

A 77-year-old man with a history of coronary artery bypass surgery including a left internal thoracic artery graft had undergone thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for a penetrating aortic ulcer at an external hospital. The left subclavian artery (LSA) had been covered (Figure 1A). The patient was admitted to our institution four months after TEVAR for shortness of breath and worsening of left ventricular ejection fraction. After multidisciplinary discussion we decided to fenestrate the previously implanted graft percutaneously.

Left brachial access was used for penetration of the TEVAR graft and right femoral access was used for delivery of stents. A 6 Fr JR4 diagnostic catheter was placed in the LSA ostium via the left brachial access. A Confianza Pro 12 wire (Asahi Intecc, Aichi, Japan) was preloaded into a PiggyBack® wire converter (Teleflex Medical, Wayne, PA, USA) and inserted into the JR4 catheter (Figure 1B). The wire was directed to transverse the graft under biplanar fluoroscopy guidance (Figure 1C). Using pecking motions of the wire we ensured that the perforation point was away from the stent skeleton of the graft and that the wire direction was perpendicular to the graft’s fabric. The wire was then clamped to an electrosurgery pencil outside the patient’s body and electrified with “cutting” energy of 80 W (Figure 1D). Using a neutral electrode of the monopolar electrosurgery on the patient’s hip, radiofrequency energy within the insulating PiggyBack was thereby conducted to the wire’s tip. Gentle pushing advanced the wire through the graft into the aorta without noticeable resistance. The PiggyBack device easily followed the wire across the wall of the graft. The wire was exchanged for a 0.014-inch 300 cm workhorse wire (BMW Universal; Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA, USA), snared and externalised via the femoral sheath. The crossing site of the graft was predilated and a balloon-expandable stent graft 8x38 mm (Advanta™ V12; Atrium Medical Corporation, Hudson, NH, USA) and an additional 8×15 mm balloon-expandable non-covered stent (PALMAZ GENESIS™; Cordis, Cardinal Health, Milpitas, CA, USA) were introduced via the transfemoral route and implanted in the LSA with slight protrusion into the aorta (Figure 1E, Figure 1F). Post-interventional measurement revealed no pressure gradient between left brachial artery and aorta.

The presented technique has been used in a similar fashion in electrified guidewire-assisted transseptal puncture, transcaval access, aortic valve laceration, or the LAMPOON technique1,2,3,4. The procedure described enables ad hoc in situ fenestration of TEVAR grafts even in urgent cases and allows an extension of the aortic arch landing zone by intentional LSA coverage.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Supplementary data

To read the full content of this article, please download the PDF.

Volume 16 Number 2
Jun 12, 2020
Volume 16 Number 2
View full issue


Key metrics

On the same subject

CLINICAL RESEARCH

10.4244/EIJV12I10A214 Nov 20, 2016
Transapical aortic stenting: an initial case series
Ghazy T et al
free

Image – Interventional flashlight

10.4244/EIJ-D-18-01171 May 20, 2019
Percutaneous management of an embolised MANTA large bore arteriotomy closure device
Wong Y-H et al
free

Clinical research

10.4244/EIJ-D-19-00547 Apr 2, 2021
Endovascular aortic repair in patients with challenging anatomies: the EXTREME study
Sirignano P et al
free

Image – Interventional flashlight

10.4244/EIJ-D-18-00700 May 20, 2019
Plug-based closure in completely percutaneous right-sided transaxillary transcatheter aortic valve implantation
Kroon H et al
free

IMAGE IN CARDIOLOGY

10.4244/EIJV12I6A122 Aug 20, 2016
Acute coronary and cerebrovascular syndrome
Binder R et al
free
Trending articles
337.88

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00904 Apr 1, 2022
Antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention
Angiolillo D et al
free
283.98

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00695 Nov 19, 2021
Transcatheter treatment for tricuspid valve disease
Praz F et al
free
226.03

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00426 Dec 3, 2021
Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary artery disease
Lindahl B et al
free
209.5

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-01034 Jun 3, 2022
Management of in-stent restenosis
Alfonso F et al
free
168.4

Expert review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00690 May 15, 2022
Crush techniques for percutaneous coronary intervention of bifurcation lesions
Moroni F et al
free
150.28

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00776 Apr 3, 2023
Computed tomographic angiography in coronary artery disease
Serruys PW et al
free
103.48

Expert consensus

10.4244/EIJ-E-22-00018 Dec 4, 2023
Definitions and Standardized Endpoints for Treatment of Coronary Bifurcations
Lunardi M et al
free
X

The Official Journal of EuroPCR and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI)

EuroPCR EAPCI
PCR ESC
Impact factor: 6.2
2022 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2023)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2024 Europa Group - All rights reserved