Impact on outcome of different types of carotid stent: results from the European Registry of Carotid Artery Stenting

EuroIntervention 2016;12:e265-e270 published online e-edition June 2016. DOI: 10.4244/EIJV12I2A41

Eugenio Stabile
Eugenio Stabile1*, MD; Giuseppe Giugliano1,2, MD; Alberto Cremonesi3, MD; Marc Bosiers4, MD; Bernhard Reimers5, MD; Carlo Setacci6, MD; Piergiorgio Cao7, MD; Andrej Schmidt8, MD; Horst Sievert9, MD; Patrick Peeters10, MD; Dimitrios Nikas5, MD; Anna Sannino1, MD; Gianmarco de Donato6, MD; Giambattista Parlani7, MD; Fausto Castriota3, MD; Marius Hornung9, MD; Paolo Rubino2, MD; Giovanni Esposito1, MD; Tullio Tesorio2, MD
1. Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy; 2. Invasive Cardiology Laboratory, Clinica Montevergine, Mercogliano, Italy; 3. Invasive Cardiology Laboratory, Villa Maria Cecilia Hospital, Cotignola, Italy;

Aims: Conflicting data exist on the impact on outcome of the use of different stent types during carotid artery stenting (CAS). The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical outcomes acc

Sign in to read and download the full article

Forgot your password?

No account yet?
Sign up for free!

Create my pcr account

Join us for free and access thousands of articles from EuroIntervention, as well as presentations, videos, cases from

carotid arteriesstentsstroke
Interventions for strokeCarotid stentingStents, devices and techniques
Read next article
Endovascular treatment vs. intravenous thrombolysis alone for ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Latest news