The Official Journal of EuroPCR and the European Association of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions (EAPCI)

CORONARY INTERVENTIONS

Impact of retrograde approach on long-term clinical outcomes of patients undergoing coronary chronic total occlusion interventions

EuroIntervention 2018;14:e1183-e1191 published online August 2018 published online e-edition December 2018. DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-18-00534

Kurashiki Central Hospital, Kurashiki, Japan

Aims: The aim of the study was to assess the long-term outcomes of coronary chronic total occlusion (CTO) lesions after retrograde percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in comparison with those after antegrade PCI alone.

Methods and results: A total of 842 consecutive patients (928 CTO lesions) undergoing PCI and subsequent follow-up were classified into two groups: retrograde PCI for at least one CTO (n=302, retrograde group) and antegrade PCI alone (n=540, antegrade group). The total procedural success rate was 89.7%. The retrograde group had significantly higher incidences of periprocedural myocardial infarction and coronary perforation (7.3% vs. 3.7%, p=0.01; 7.9% vs. 4.4%, p=0.04, respectively). Median follow-up duration was 7.7 (interquartile range 5.6-8.7) years. Seven-year relative risk comparing the retrograde and antegrade groups was neutral in all-cause death (adjusted HR [aHR] 1.06, 95% CI: 0.75-1.49; p=0.745), cardiac death (aHR 0.85, 95% CI: 0.47-1.55; p=0.598), coronary artery bypass grafting (aHR 1.62, 95% CI: 0.74-3.54; p=0.229), and non-target vessel revascularisation (aHR 0.96, 95% CI: 0.78-1.17; p=0.663).

Conclusions: Retrograde CTO PCI did not lead to worse long-term outcomes despite increased risk in periprocedural myocardial infarction and coronary perforation.

Sign in to read and download the full article

Forgot your password?
No account yet? Sign up for free!
Create my pcr account

Join us for free and access thousands of articles from EuroIntervention, as well as presentations, videos, cases from PCRonline.com

Read next article

Rotational atherectomy in CTO lesions: too risky? Outcome of rotational atherectomy in CTO lesions compared to non-CTO lesions