Debate

DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-E-23-00070

Guideline recommendations for cangrelor should be upgraded: pros and cons

George Dangas1, MD, PhD; Johny Nicolas1, MD, MSc; Paul Harbich2, MD; Kurt Huber2,3, MD
Introduction

Cangrelor is an intravenous (IV) P2Y12 receptor inhibitor that is characterised by high potency and a more rapid onset and offset of the pharmacological effect as compared to oral P2Y12 inhibitors. The latest European guidelines on acute coronary syndromes (ACS) recommend its use in P2Y12 receptor inhibitor-naïve patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This statement has been provided with a Class IIb recommendation and a Level of Evidence A, therefore meaning that the current evidence on the use of cangrelor is still not definitive. Randomised trials of cangrelor have yielded mixed results, and a meta-analysis of these trials has shown that cangrelor was associated with reduced ischaemic events and increased minor bleeding. However, the benefit of cangrelor was reduced when compared to upfront clopidogrel, and no conclusive data are available in case of administration of potent oral P2Y12 inhibitors (i.e., prasugrel or ticagrelor). Based on current evidence, cangrelor is not the standard antithrombotic strategy for unselected ACS patients undergoing PCI, and whether the current recommendation should be upgraded is a matter of debate.

Pros

George Dangas, MD, PhD; Johny...

Sign in to read
the full article

Forgot your password?
No account yet?
Sign up for free!

Create my pcr account

Join us for free and access thousands of articles from EuroIntervention, as well as presentations, videos, cases from PCRonline.com

Volume 20 Number 7
Apr 1, 2024
Volume 20 Number 7
View full issue


Key metrics

On the same subject

Research correspondence

10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00594 Mar 20, 2023
Pharmacodynamic effects of cangrelor in elective complex PCI: insights from the POMPEII Registry
Gargiulo G et al
free

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00904 Apr 1, 2022
Antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention
Angiolillo D et al
free
Trending articles
339.13

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00904 Apr 1, 2022
Antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention
Angiolillo D et al
free
312.48

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00695 Nov 19, 2021
Transcatheter treatment for tricuspid valve disease
Praz F et al
free
295.45

Expert consensus

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00898 Sep 20, 2022
Intravascular ultrasound guidance for lower extremity arterial and venous interventions
Secemsky E et al
free
226.03

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00426 Dec 3, 2021
Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary artery disease
Lindahl B et al
free
209.5

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-01034 Jun 3, 2022
Management of in-stent restenosis
Alfonso F et al
free
168.4

Expert review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00690 May 15, 2022
Crush techniques for percutaneous coronary intervention of bifurcation lesions
Moroni F et al
free
149.43

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00776 Apr 3, 2023
Computed tomographic angiography in coronary artery disease
Serruys PW et al
free
X

The Official Journal of EuroPCR and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI)

EuroPCR EAPCI
PCR ESC
Impact factor: 6.2
2022 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2023)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2024 Europa Group - All rights reserved