INTERVENTIONAL FLASHLIGHT

DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00081

Five-year follow-up of underexpanded and overexpanded bioresorbable scaffolds: self-correction and impact on shear stress

Ryo Torii1, PhD; Erhan Tenekecioglu2, MD; Christos Bourantas3,4, MD, PhD; Eric Poon5, PhD; Vikas Thondapu5,6, MD; Frank Gijsen7, PhD; Yohei Sotomi8, MD; Yoshinobu Onuma2, MD, PhD; Peter Barlis6, MD, PhD; Andrew S.H. Ooi5, PhD; Patrick W. Serruys2,9*, MD, PhD

Two patients received 3.0×18 mm Absorb™ bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA, USA), one in the left anterior descending coronary artery, the other in the circumflex coronary artery. Post-implantation OCT (pullback speed: 20 mm/s, acquisition rate: 200 frames/s) and angiographic data were fused to reconstruct the coronary anatomy, and computational fluid dynamic (CFD) techniques were used to simulate Newtonian steady blood flow and estimate endothelial shear stress (ESS) distributions1. Panels A, B, C & P1 show underexpansion of the scaffold (mean expansion index: 0.51). Panels D, E, F & P2 show an overexpanded bioresorbable scaffold (mean expansion index: 1.32).

In the CFD model of the underexpanded case (Panel C), high ESS (in red) was noted on top of the struts which disrupted the flow, creating recirculation zones and low ESS (in dark blue) in the inter-strut zones. Scaffold underexpansion caused a “step-down” at the proximal edge of the scaffolded segment (Panel P1, black box in Panel C). On the five-year OCT, there was attenuation of the step-down appearance with normalised ESS in the proximal edge segment (Panels A’, B’ , C’ & P1’); the luminal surface was smoother and overall the shear stress was more homogeneous and physiological (1.5-3.0 Pa).

In the CFD model of the overexpanded case, low ESS was detected not only in the inter-strut areas but also on top of the struts. Scaffold overexpansion caused a “step-up” at the proximal edge of the scaffolded segment. At the five-year follow-up, the step-up became less prominent and the areas of very low shear stress regressed considerably (Panels D’, E’, F’ & P2’).

These two cases of overexpansion and underexpansion at baseline resulted acutely in two different shear stress distributions. Both increased and decreased ESS appear to induce a biological mechano-transduction process that aims at normalising ESS levels at long-term follow-up to values close to the physiological ranges (1.5-2.5 Pa). The mechanism of “normalisation” seems to be related to a dynamic remodelling, which presumably resulted from shear stress, wall stress, cyclic strain and other important biologic factors2,3.

Practical implication

Underexpansion and overexpansion have been incriminated as causative factors of adverse cardiac events. However, dynamic biological interaction between vessel wall and scaffold may attenuate the adverse haemodynamic impact of overexpansion or underexpansion.

Guest Editor

This paper was guest edited by Lorenz Räber, MD, PhD; Department of Cardiology, Swiss Cardiovascular Center, University Hospital Bern, Switzerland.

Conflict of interest statement

P.W. Serruys and Y. Onuma are members of the International Advisory Board of Abbott Vascular. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. The Guest Editor has no conflicts of interest to declare.

Volume 12 Number 17
Apr 20, 2017
Volume 12 Number 17
View full issue


Key metrics

On the same subject

EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH

10.4244/EIJY15M07_02 Mar 18, 2016
Bioabsorbable vascular scaffold overexpansion: insights from in vitro post-expansion experiments
Foin N et al
free
Trending articles
281.88

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00695 Nov 19, 2021
Transcatheter treatment for tricuspid valve disease
Praz F et al
free
243.2

State of the art

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-01117 Sep 20, 2022
Recanalisation of coronary chronic total occlusions
Di Mario C et al
free
208.35

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-01034 Jun 3, 2022
Management of in-stent restenosis
Alfonso F et al
free
168.7

Translational research

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00824 May 15, 2022
Bench test and in vivo evaluation of longitudinal stent deformation during proximal optimisation
Toth GG et al
free
167.05

Expert review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00690 May 15, 2022
Crush techniques for percutaneous coronary intervention of bifurcation lesions
Moroni F et al
free
151.03

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00776 Apr 3, 2023
Computed tomographic angiography in coronary artery disease
Serruys PW et al
free
118

Translational research

10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00718 Jun 5, 2023
Preclinical evaluation of the degradation kinetics of third-generation resorbable magnesium scaffolds
Seguchi M et al
110.35

Viewpoint

10.4244/EIJ-E-22-00007 May 15, 2022
TAVI at 20: how a crazy idea led to a clinical revolution
Eltchaninoff H et al
free
X

The Official Journal of EuroPCR and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI)

EuroPCR EAPCI
PCR ESC
Impact factor: 6.2
2022 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2023)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2024 Europa Group - All rights reserved