DOI: 10.4244/EIJV13IZA2

Current trends in coronary interventions: an overview from the EAPCI registries

Emanuele Barbato1,2*, MD, PhD; Dariusz Dudek3, MD, PhD, FESC; Andreas Baumbach4, MD, FESC; Stephan Windecker5, MD, PhD, FESC; Michael Haude6, MD, FESC

The current report provides a six-year overview of trends for coronary interventions from the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI) registries1. From 2010 to 2015, significant changes in coronary interventions occurred after compelling clinical evidence for practice change became available and subsequent guideline recommendations were published2. The radial artery has become the preferred vascular access, being chosen in two thirds of the procedures (Table 1). The average number of PCI per operator has slightly increased, though complex procedures such as PCI of the left main, chronic total occlusions and with rotational atherectomy have remained unchanged.

Trends in total PCI and primary PCI (pPCI) numbers followed two main patterns: a stable, slow growing pattern in Group A and a pattern of rapid growth in coronary interventions in Group B. This difference in PCI growth was most likely linked to the median number of PCI at the beginning of the observation period: in countries of Group A twice as many PCI and pPCI per million inhabitants were reported in 2010 as compared with countries of Group B (Table 1). Yet, over the subsequent six years, countries of Group B had an exponential growth especially in pPCI (Figure 1). Overall, the monitored countries have reached or come closer to the 600 pPCI per million inhabitants recommended by the Stent for Life initiative3.

Figure 1. Trends in PCI and primary PCI (pPCI) from 2010 to 2015. Upper panels: PCI total and pPCI are expressed as increase versus 2010 per million inhabitants. Lower panel: ratio of pPCI to total PCI. Countries of Group A: Belgium, Denmark, France, Israel, Italy, Poland, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, UK. Countries of Group B: Egypt, Kazakhstan, Macedonia, Portugal, Serbia.

Strong evidence in favour of the use of drug-eluting stents (DES) has become available both in elective and in acute coronary syndrome patients1. This was associated with a high DES penetration rate (above 70% in most of the countries) with a growth ranging between 20% and 50% (Figure 2). However, reimbursement issues still represented the main obstacle in some countries.

Figure 2. Penetration of drug-eluting stents (DES) in 2015 (bars), and rate of DES adoption (continuous line) from 2010 to 2015 in the 15 countries providing data on DES implantation. DES data unavailable for Turkey.

Finally, despite the lack of reimbursement in many countries, the use of intracoronary physiology techniques doubled from 2010 to 2015, though it still remained lower than 6% and 20% of the total volume of coronary angiography and of PCI, respectively (Figure 3). Given the less strong evidence, a stable and rather low trend in the adoption of intracoronary imaging techniques was observed during the period analysed (Table 1).

Figure 3. Rate of invasive physiologic assessment (IC physiology) overall (black line) and in the individual participating countries (coloured lines). Upper panel: IC physiology corrected by total number of coronary angiographies. Lower panel: IC physiology corrected by total number of PCI (after excluding pPCI).

Despite inherent limitations linked to the heterogeneous data collection, this six-year overview of the EAPCI registries demonstrates a good overall adoption of novel therapies and implementation of guideline recommendations. Budget constraints and limited reimbursement policies still represent the main reasons for the scattered rate of adoption and implementation.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.


References

Volume 13 Supplement Z
May 15, 2017
Volume 13 Supplement Z
View full issue


Key metrics

Suggested by Cory

10.4244/EIJ-D-16-00870 May 15, 2017
Italy: coronary and structural heart interventions from 2010 to 2015
Berti S et al
free

10.4244/EIJ-D-16-00834 May 15, 2017
Spain: coronary and structural heart interventions from 2010 to 2015
García del Blanco B et al
free

10.4244/EIJ-D-16-00828 May 15, 2017
Switzerland: coronary and structural heart interventions from 2010 to 2015
Rigamonti F et al
free

10.4244/EIJV7I6A31 Jun 30, 2010
Percutaneous coronary interventions in Europe in 2006
Moschovitis A et al
free

10.4244/EIJ-D-16-00830 May 15, 2017
Sweden: coronary and structural heart interventions from 2010 to 2015
Witt N et al
free

10.4244/EIJ-D-16-00836 May 15, 2017
Poland: coronary and structural heart interventions from 2010 to 2015
Legutko J et al
free

10.4244/EIJV10I9A175 Jan 22, 2015
Standards of care: The EAPCI, guidelines and consensus documents
Windecker S
free

Expert review

10.4244/EIJ-D-19-01124 Apr 17, 2020
The year in review: coronary interventions
Gao C et al
free

CORONARY INTERVENTIONS

10.4244/EIJY19M01_01 Feb 20, 2019
2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization
free
Trending articles
318.3

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00695 Nov 19, 2021
Transcatheter treatment for tricuspid valve disease
Praz F et al
free
116.85

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00066 Apr 21, 2025
Management of complications after valvular interventions
Bansal A et al
free
108.3

Viewpoint

10.4244/EIJ-E-22-00007 May 15, 2022
TAVI at 20: how a crazy idea led to a clinical revolution
Eltchaninoff H et al
free
91.6

Image – Interventional flashlight

10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00344 Aug 5, 2022
First dedicated transcatheter leaflet splitting device: the ShortCut device
Tchétché D et al
free
72.15

State-of-the-art

10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00627 Feb 6, 2023
Left atrial appendage occlusion
Holmes D et al
free
68.9

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00992 Sep 15, 2025
Antithrombotic therapy in complex percutaneous coronary intervention
Castiello D et al
free
49.55

CLINICAL RESEARCH

10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00962 Apr 6, 2018
A new optical coherence tomography-based calcium scoring system to predict stent underexpansion
Fujino A et al
free
42.95

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00145 Sep 20, 2021
Robotics, imaging, and artificial intelligence in the catheterisation laboratory
Beyar R et al
free
X

PCR
Impact factor: 9.5
2024 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2025)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2025 Europa Group - All rights reserved