Expert review

Comparison of intravascular ultrasound versus angiography-guided drug-eluting stent implantation: a meta-analysis of one randomised trial and ten observational studies involving 19,619 patients

EuroIntervention 2012;8:855-865. DOI: 10.4244/EIJV8I7A129

Yaojun Zhang1 ,2, MD, PhD; Vasim Farooq2, MBChB, MRCP; Hector M. Garcia-Garcia2, MD, PhD; Christos V. Bourantas2, MD, PhD; Nailiang Tian1, MD; Shengjie Dong3, MSc; Minghui Li1, PhD; Shaohua Yang1, MD; Patrick W. Serruys2, MD, PhD; Shao-Liang Chen1*, MD, PhD

1. Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China; 2. Thoraxcenter, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; 3. Soochow University, Suzhou, China

Aims: The impact of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guided coronary drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation on clinical outcomes remains c

Forgot your password?

No account yet? Sign up for free!

Create my pcr account

Join us for free and access thousands of articles from EuroIntervention, as well as presentations, videos, cases from PCRonline.com

angiographyclinical researchintravascular ultrasoundmajor adverse cardiac eventsstent thrombosis

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin

Comparison of intravascular ultrasound versus angiography-guided drug-eluting stent implantation: a meta-analysis of one randomised trial and ten observational studies involving 19,619 patients

Latest news