The Official Journal of EuroPCR and the European Association of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions (EAPCI)

CORONARY INTERVENTIONS

Characteristics of national and major regional percutaneous coronary intervention registries: a structured literature review

EuroIntervention 2018;14:1112-1120 published online July 2018. DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-18-00434

1. School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; 2. Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia; 3. Department of Cardiology, Western Health, Melbourne, Australia; 4. Department of Cardiology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia; 5. Department of Clinical Pharmacology and General Medicine, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia; 6. Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom; 7. School of Public Health, Curtin University, Perth, Australia; 8. Baker IDI Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Australia

Aims: Clinical registries have a growing role in the assessment of healthcare quality and safety. It is unclear, however, how many countries utilise registries for patients who receive percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The aim of this review was to provide an overview of the characteristics of PCI registries from around the world.

Methods and results: A systematic search of the published and online grey literature was undertaken to identify currently active national PCI registries. In countries without a national PCI registry, the three largest regional registries were included. Thirty registries in 26 countries that met inclusion criteria were identified, of which 24 (80%) are national registries and six (20%) are regional registries. Fourteen registries (47%) collect 30-day mortality rates while 11 registries (37%) collect 12-month mortality rates. Nine registries (30%) provide risk-adjusted mortality rates and 16 registries (53%) report bleeding outcomes, utilising a variety of bleeding definitions. Thirteen registries (43%) publicly report key quality metrics.

Conclusions: There is substantial geographic variation in the distribution of PCI registries. Comparison across registries is challenging due to varying data definitions and collection time points. Public reporting of outcomes data is being increasingly implemented by PCI registries, but risk-adjustment models remain underutilised.

Sign in to read and download the full article

Forgot your password?
No account yet? Sign up for free!
Create my pcr account

Join us for free and access thousands of articles from EuroIntervention, as well as presentations, videos, cases from PCRonline.com

Read next article
Optical coherence tomography substudy of a prospective multicentre randomised post-market trial to assess the safety and effectiveness of the Firehawk cobalt-chromium coronary stent (rapamycin target-eluting) system for the treatment of atherosclerotic lesions: TARGET All Comers