IMAGE IN CARDIOLOGY

DOI: 10.4244/EIJV10I3A57

Bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation for recurrent in-stent restenosis: an option in case of multiple failures?

Alfonso Ielasi, MD; Antonio Saino, MD; Antonio Silvestro, MD; Davide Personeni, MD; Maurizio Tespili*, MD

An 80-year-old male underwent coronary angiography for unstable angina. He had a history of multiple PCI in the LCx towards OM1 due to recurrent in-stent restenosis (ISR) (bare metal stent-ISR treated with drug-eluting stent [DES]; DES-ISR treated with cutting and non-compliant [NC] balloons; new DES-ISR treated with drug-eluting balloon). The angiography showed a recalcitrant multifocal ISR on OM1 (Figure 1A, Figure 1B). Although off-label, we treated the ISR with two (3.5×18 mm and 3.5×28 mm) bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS; Absorb™; Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA, USA) implanted in overlap from distal to proximal OM1. Post-dilatation was performed with a 3.5×21 mm NC balloon. Final angiographic (Figure 1C, Figure 1D) and IVUS (Figure 1E, Figure 1F) results were good as well as six-month angiographic follow-up (Online Figure 1A, Online Figure 1B). These images show that BVS may be an option in case of recalcitrant ISR after failure of the conventional treatment.

Figure 1. A) & B) Restenosis in the distal and proximal OM1 at baseline angiography. Final angiographic (C & D) and IVUS results at the proximal (E) and distal (F) ISR sites following in-stent BVS implantation.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Online Figure 1. A) & B) Six-month angiographic follow-up showing patency of the OM1 segment treated with in-stent BVS implantation.

Moving image 1. Pre-PCI IVUS pullback from the distal to proximal OM1 showing multiple strut layers and multifocal ISR.

Moving image 2. Final IVUS pullback following BVS implantation from distal to proximal OM1.

Volume 10 Number 3
Jul 21, 2014
Volume 10 Number 3
View full issue


Key metrics

Suggested by Cory

IMAGE IN CARDIOLOGY

10.4244/EIJY14M10_07 Nov 20, 2015
Subacute thrombosis of a bioresorbable vascular scaffold implanted for recurrent in-stent restenosis
Rivero F et al
free

Image – Interventional flashlight

10.4244/EIJ-D-19-00063 Jan 20, 2021
Late structural discontinuity after bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation in patients with in-stent restenosis
Cuesta J et al
free

10.4244/EIJV11SVA42 May 19, 2015
Treatment of bioresorbable scaffold failure
Felix C et al
free

10.4244/EIJV11I12A280 Mar 18, 2016
Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds for recurrent in-stent restenosis
Rivero F et al
free
Trending articles
153.65

Clinical research

10.4244/EIJ-D-20-01125 Oct 20, 2021
An upfront combined strategy for endovascular haemostasis in transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation
Costa G et al
free
54.9

Expert review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-01010 Jun 24, 2022
Device-related thrombus following left atrial appendage occlusion
Simard T et al
free
43.25

Clinical Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-01091 Aug 5, 2022
Lifetime management of patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis: a computed tomography simulation study
Medranda G et al
free
X

The Official Journal of EuroPCR and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI)

EuroPCR EAPCI
PCR ESC
Impact factor: 7.6
2023 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2024)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2024 Europa Group - All rights reserved