IMAGE IN CARDIOLOGY

DOI: 10.4244/EIJV12I9A194

Bilateral, reversible coronary obstruction during aortic valve-in-valve implantation of a repositionable valve system

Fabien Praz1, MD; Aris Moschovitis1, MD; Stefan Stortecky1, MD; Thomas Pilgrim1, MD; Balthasar Eberle2, MD; Stephan Windecker1*, MD

An 80-year-old male patient was admitted to our institution due to new-onset orthopnoea ten years after surgical aortic valve replacement with a 25 mm stentless Freedom Solo bioprosthesis (Sorin Group, Milan, Italy). An echocardiogram revealed severe aortic valve regurgitation owing to a tear in one of the bioprosthetic valve leaflets. In view of the anticipated risk of coronary obstruction associated with this specific type of stentless bioprosthetic valve, TAVI with the use of a fully repositionable 27 mm Lotus™ valve (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, USA) was planned.

Deployment of the Lotus valve was performed aiming at a rather low implantation depth. This led to resolution of the aortic regurgitation. However, immediate haemodynamic compromise (Panel A, arrow point 1) was observed due to the occlusion of both coronary arteries (Panel B). After partial valve retrieval, a contrast injection confirmed restoration of TIMI 3 flow in both coronary arteries resulting in resolution of profound hypotension (Panel A, Panel C, Moving image 1). Repositioning of the Lotus valve at a different depth resulted in a similar haemodynamic compromise due to re-occlusion of the coronary circulation (Moving image 2). As bail-out strategy, a CoreValve® Evolut™ R 29 mm prosthesis (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) was successfully deployed (Panel A, arrow point 2). A final aortogram confirmed patency of both coronary arteries (Panel D) with mild paravalvular regurgitation (Panel E, arrow). Furthermore, a sustained rise of the diastolic blood pressure was observed (Panel A).

This report illustrates the value of fully repositionable transcatheter valve prostheses in order to avoid the risk of irreversible coronary obstruction which is increased with some types of surgical stentless bioprostheses.

Conflict of interest statement

T. Pilgrim reports having received research grants to the institution from Biotronik and speaker’s fees from Medtronic and Biotronik. S. Windecker reports receiving research grants to the institution from Abbott, Boston Scientific, Biosensors, Cordis, Medtronic, and St. Jude. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Supplementary data

Moving image 1. Restoration of TIMI 3 flow in both coronary arteries after partial valve retrieval.

Moving image 2. Bilateral coronary occlusion despite repositioning of the Lotus valve at a lower depth. Retrieval of the valve.

Supplementary data

To read the full content of this article, please download the PDF.

Restoration of TIMI 3 flow in both coronary arteries after partial valve retrieval

Bilateral coronary occlusion despite repositioning of the Lotus valve at a lower depth. Retrieval of the valve.

Volume 12 Number 9
Oct 20, 2016
Volume 12 Number 9
View full issue


Key metrics

Suggested by Cory

INTERVENTIONAL FLASHLIGHT

10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00850 Jun 14, 2018
Transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve treatment in prior Sorin Freedom Solo valve
Rahman MS et al
free

CLINICAL RESEARCH

10.4244/EIJY15M07_01 Apr 20, 2016
First Lotus aortic valve-in-valve implantation to treat degenerated Mitroflow bioprostheses
Castriota F et al
free

EXPERT REVIEW

10.4244/EIJ-D-18-00667 Sep 7, 2018
Novel strategies in aortic valve-in-valve therapy including bioprosthetic valve fracture and BASILICA
Dvir D et al
free

Image – Interventional flashlight

10.4244/EIJ-D-19-00690 Aug 28, 2020
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation after transcatheter mitral valve implantation
Kuhn E et al
free

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00157 Oct 20, 2021
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in degenerated surgical aortic valves
Tarantini G et al
free

Image – Interventional flashlight

10.4244/EIJ-D-19-00826 Sep 18, 2020
ACURATE neo valve perforation after valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation
Rück A et al
free
Trending articles
151.43

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00776 Apr 3, 2023
Computed tomographic angiography in coronary artery disease
Serruys PW et al
free
55.9

Clinical research

10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00621 Feb 20, 2023
Long-term changes in coronary physiology after aortic valve replacement
Sabbah M et al
free
54.9

Expert review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-01010 Jun 24, 2022
Device-related thrombus following left atrial appendage occlusion
Simard T et al
free
43.75

Clinical Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-01091 Aug 5, 2022
Lifetime management of patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis: a computed tomography simulation study
Medranda G et al
free
39.95

Clinical research

10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00558 Feb 6, 2023
Permanent pacemaker implantation and left bundle branch block with self-expanding valves – a SCOPE 2 subanalysis
Pellegrini C et al
free
X

The Official Journal of EuroPCR and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI)

EuroPCR EAPCI
PCR ESC
Impact factor: 7.6
2023 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2024)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2024 Europa Group - All rights reserved