IMAGE IN CARDIOLOGY

DOI: 10.4244/EIJV12I9A194

Bilateral, reversible coronary obstruction during aortic valve-in-valve implantation of a repositionable valve system

Fabien Praz1, MD; Aris Moschovitis1, MD; Stefan Stortecky1, MD; Thomas Pilgrim1, MD; Balthasar Eberle2, MD; Stephan Windecker1*, MD

An 80-year-old male patient was admitted to our institution due to new-onset orthopnoea ten years after surgical aortic valve replacement with a 25 mm stentless Freedom Solo bioprosthesis (Sorin Group, Milan, Italy). An echocardiogram revealed severe aortic valve regurgitation owing to a tear in one of the bioprosthetic valve leaflets. In view of the anticipated risk of coronary obstruction associated with this specific type of stentless bioprosthetic valve, TAVI with the use of a fully repositionable 27 mm Lotus™ valve (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, USA) was planned.

Deployment of the Lotus valve was performed aiming at a rather low implantation depth. This led to resolution of the aortic regurgitation. However, immediate haemodynamic compromise (Panel A, arrow point 1) was observed due to the occlusion of both coronary arteries (Panel B). After partial valve retrieval, a contrast injection confirmed restoration of TIMI 3 flow in both coronary arteries resulting in resolution of profound hypotension (Panel A, Panel C, Moving image 1). Repositioning of the Lotus valve at a different depth resulted in a similar haemodynamic compromise due to re-occlusion of the coronary circulation (Moving image 2). As bail-out strategy, a CoreValve® Evolut™ R 29 mm prosthesis (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) was successfully deployed (Panel A, arrow point 2). A final aortogram confirmed patency of both coronary arteries (Panel D) with mild paravalvular regurgitation (Panel E, arrow). Furthermore, a sustained rise of the diastolic blood pressure was observed (Panel A).

This report illustrates the value of fully repositionable transcatheter valve prostheses in order to avoid the risk of irreversible coronary obstruction which is increased with some types of surgical stentless bioprostheses.

Conflict of interest statement

T. Pilgrim reports having received research grants to the institution from Biotronik and speaker’s fees from Medtronic and Biotronik. S. Windecker reports receiving research grants to the institution from Abbott, Boston Scientific, Biosensors, Cordis, Medtronic, and St. Jude. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Supplementary data

Moving image 1. Restoration of TIMI 3 flow in both coronary arteries after partial valve retrieval.

Moving image 2. Bilateral coronary occlusion despite repositioning of the Lotus valve at a lower depth. Retrieval of the valve.

Supplementary data

To read the full content of this article, please download the PDF.

Restoration of TIMI 3 flow in both coronary arteries after partial valve retrieval

Bilateral coronary occlusion despite repositioning of the Lotus valve at a lower depth. Retrieval of the valve.

Volume 12 Number 9
Oct 20, 2016
Volume 12 Number 9
View full issue


Key metrics

On the same subject

INTERVENTIONAL FLASHLIGHT

10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00850 Jun 14, 2018
Transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve treatment in prior Sorin Freedom Solo valve
Rahman MS et al
free

CLINICAL RESEARCH

10.4244/EIJY15M07_01 Apr 20, 2016
First Lotus aortic valve-in-valve implantation to treat degenerated Mitroflow bioprostheses
Castriota F et al
free

Image – Interventional flashlight

10.4244/EIJ-D-19-00690 Aug 28, 2020
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation after transcatheter mitral valve implantation
Kuhn E et al
free

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00157 Oct 20, 2021
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in degenerated surgical aortic valves
Tarantini G et al
free

Image – Interventional flashlight

10.4244/EIJ-D-19-00826 Sep 18, 2020
ACURATE neo valve perforation after valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation
Rück A et al
free

Image – Interventional flashlight

10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00385 Jan 23, 2023
Double chimney stenting without contrast during transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve implantation
Armario X et al
free
Trending articles
338.03

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00904 Apr 1, 2022
Antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention
Angiolillo D et al
free
284.93

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00695 Nov 19, 2021
Transcatheter treatment for tricuspid valve disease
Praz F et al
free
226.03

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00426 Dec 3, 2021
Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary artery disease
Lindahl B et al
free
209.5

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-01034 Jun 3, 2022
Management of in-stent restenosis
Alfonso F et al
free
168.15

Expert review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00690 May 15, 2022
Crush techniques for percutaneous coronary intervention of bifurcation lesions
Moroni F et al
free
150.28

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00776 Apr 3, 2023
Computed tomographic angiography in coronary artery disease
Serruys PW et al
free
118

Translational research

10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00718 Jun 5, 2023
Preclinical evaluation of the degradation kinetics of third-generation resorbable magnesium scaffolds
Seguchi M et al
X

The Official Journal of EuroPCR and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI)

EuroPCR EAPCI
PCR ESC
Impact factor: 6.2
2022 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2023)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2024 Europa Group - All rights reserved