Research Correspondence

DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00734

Angiography-based radial wall strain in carotid plaques and its association with plaque vulnerability

Shiteng Suo1, PhD; Huilin Zhao2, MD; Chunming Li3, BSc; Mengqiu Cao2, MD; Zhiqing Wang4, MD; Jin Zhang2, MD; Tonglei Han5, MD; Daqiao Guo5, MD; Weiguo Fu5, MD; Yan Zhou2, MD; Shengxian Tu3, PhD

For improved risk stratification of carotid stenosis, it is necessary to incorporate factors beyond mere stenosis severity1. Biomechanics is a key factor contributing to plaque vulnerability2. Our study introduces angiography-derived radial wall strain (RWS) to analyse carotid stenosis biomechanics and their association with plaque composition and vulnerability.

We included consecutive patients with internal carotid artery stenosis undergoing both carotid 3.0T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) within 1 week between July 2019 and December 2021 (Supplementary Figure 1). RWS was calculated as the ratio of the difference between the maximum and minimum lumen diameter (i.e., max−min) to the maximum diameter after automatic lumen segmentation and registration of four representative DSA frames of the cardiac cycle3 (Central illustration). RWSmax represented the lesion’s maximum RWS value. Plaque composition and vulnerability were determined by carotid MRI (Supplementary Table 1, Supplementary Figure 2). A detailed description of the eligibility criteria, carotid DSA and RWS analysis, carotid MRI and image interpretation, and statistical analysis is provided in Supplementary Appendix 1.

After screening, 110 patients...

Sign in to read
the full article

Forgot your password?
No account yet?
Sign up for free!

Create my pcr account

Join us for free and access thousands of articles from EuroIntervention, as well as presentations, videos, cases from PCRonline.com

Volume 21 Number 4
Feb 17, 2025
Volume 21 Number 4
View full issue


Key metrics

Suggested by Cory

Clinical research

10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00537 Jan 23, 2023
Radial wall strain: a novel angiographic measure of plaque composition and vulnerability
Hong H et al
free

Letter to the editor

10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00560 Aug 19, 2024
Letter: Identifying vulnerable coronary atherosclerotic plaques: from theory to practice
Dimitriadis K et al

Clinical research

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00611 Mar 4, 2024
Angiography‑based quantitative flow ratio for functional assessment of intracranial atherosclerotic disease
Huang K et al
free

Editorial

10.4244/EIJ-E-22-00051 Jan 23, 2023
What makes a plaque rupture? A simple answer seems too much to ask for
Achenbach S
free

Viewpoint

10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00397 Oct 21, 2022
Skating on thin ice: searching for vulnerable plaques
Prati F et al
free
Trending articles
58.7

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00386 Feb 3, 2025
Mechanical circulatory support for complex, high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention
Ferro E et al
free
39.45

Clinical research

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00725 Nov 19, 2023
A systematic algorithm for large-bore arterial access closure after TAVI: the TAVI-MultiCLOSE study
Rosseel L et al
free
39.45

Original Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00725 Mar 18, 2024
A systematic algorithm for large-bore arterial access closure after TAVI: the TAVI-MultiCLOSE study
Rosseel L et al
free
34.3

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00895 Apr 1, 2024
Percutaneous interventions for pulmonary embolism
Finocchiaro S et al
free
22.55

CLINICAL RESEARCH

10.4244/EIJV12I5A93 Aug 5, 2016
Longer pre-hospital delays and higher mortality in women with STEMI: the e-MUST Registry
Benamer H et al
free
16.3

Debate

10.4244/EIJ-E-24-00072 Mar 17, 2025
Routine diagnosis of ANOCA/INOCA: pros and cons
Montone R et al
free
X

The Official Journal of EuroPCR and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI)

EuroPCR EAPCI
PCR ESC
Impact factor: 7.6
2023 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2024)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2025 Europa Group - All rights reserved