We appreciate the interest in our article1. The author (N. Saito) raised the issue of fundamental errors in the primary assumption for the mathematical model of FFR post-stenting and suggested that the application of the prediction model in Yamamoto et al2 would improve the outcomes of FFR prediction.
The flow rate (Q) in our derivation is defined as the coronary flow (not as the perfusion flow), which determines the translesional pressure gradient3. It is well established that the coronary flow is proportional to the difference between the distal pressure and the wedge pressure4. This is also the first ...
Sign in to read and download the full articleForgot your password?
Join us for free and access thousands of articles from EuroIntervention, as well as presentations, videos, cases from PCRonline.com