DOI: 10.4244/EIJV13I17A339

Reply to the letter to the editor by Saito regarding the article “In vivo validation of mathematically derived fractional flow reserve for assessing haemodynamics of coronary tandem lesions”

Jihoon Kweon, PhD; Young-Hak Kim*, MD

We appreciate the interest in our article1. The author (N. Saito) raised the issue of fundamental errors in the primary assumption for the mathematical model of FFR post-stenting and suggested that the application of the prediction model in Yamamoto et al2 would improve the outcomes of FFR prediction.

The flow rate (Q) in our derivation is defined as the coronary flow (not as the perfusion flow), which determines the translesional pressure gradient3. It is well established that the coronary flow is proportional to the difference between the distal pressure and the wedge pressure4. This is also the first equation for the model derivation of De Bruyne et al5, which was considered as the “conventional model” for the comparison in our publication. Because the same assumptions were made for the derivation, the prediction equations of our model are inherently equivalent to those of De Bruyne et al2. We believe our mathematical derivation is founded on the well-established knowledge of coronary physiology.

In the validation of our model, the predicted FFR values were situated within the band of true FFR±0.03 or slightly overestimated. When w=1 is used as suggested, instead of w=1.33 in our derivation, the denominator in the equation becomes larger and the predicted FFR values are further overestimated.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Supplementary data

Both of the letters to the Editor disputing the paper, “Invivo validation of mathematically derived fractional flow reserve for assessing haemodynamics of coronary tandem lesions”1, together with all further correspondence can be found online in the Supplementary data.

To read the full content of this article, please download the PDF.

Volume 13 Number 17
Apr 20, 2018
Volume 13 Number 17
View full issue


Key metrics

Suggested by Cory

Clinical research

10.4244/EIJ-D-18-00668 Oct 18, 2019
Personalised fractional flow reserve: a novel concept to optimise myocardial revascularisation
Gosling R et al
free

10.4244/EIJV11SVA11 May 19, 2015
Image-based assessment of fractional flow reserve
Tu S et al
free
Trending articles
318.1

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00695 Nov 19, 2021
Transcatheter treatment for tricuspid valve disease
Praz F et al
free
116.5

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00066 Apr 21, 2025
Management of complications after valvular interventions
Bansal A et al
free
108.3

Viewpoint

10.4244/EIJ-E-22-00007 May 15, 2022
TAVI at 20: how a crazy idea led to a clinical revolution
Eltchaninoff H et al
free
91.6

Image – Interventional flashlight

10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00344 Aug 5, 2022
First dedicated transcatheter leaflet splitting device: the ShortCut device
Tchétché D et al
free
72.15

State-of-the-art

10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00627 Feb 6, 2023
Left atrial appendage occlusion
Holmes D et al
free
68.9

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00992 Sep 15, 2025
Antithrombotic therapy in complex percutaneous coronary intervention
Castiello D et al
free
49.55

CLINICAL RESEARCH

10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00962 Apr 6, 2018
A new optical coherence tomography-based calcium scoring system to predict stent underexpansion
Fujino A et al
free
43.45

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00145 Sep 20, 2021
Robotics, imaging, and artificial intelligence in the catheterisation laboratory
Beyar R et al
free
X

PCR
Impact factor: 9.5
2024 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2025)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2025 Europa Group - All rights reserved