The Official Journal of EuroPCR and the European Association of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions (EAPCI)

Prediction of radial crossover in acute coronary syndromes: derivation and validation of the MATRIX score

DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00441

1. Department of Cardiology, Inselspital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; 2. Division of Cardiology, Department of Translational Medicine, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Caserta, Italy; 3. Department of Medicine, McMaster University, and Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON, Canada; 4. Clinical Trials Unit, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; 5. Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; 6. Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy; 7. University of Pavia and Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico S.Matteo, Pavia, Italy; 8. Department of Cardiology and Critical Care Medicine, Hartcentrum Hasselt, Jessa Ziekenhuis, Hasselt, Belgium; 9. Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Hasselt, Hasselt, Belgium; 10. Unit of Cardiology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Messina, Italy; 11. Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy; 12. Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University of Rome, Latina, Italy; 13. Mediterranea Cardiocentro, Naples, Italy; 14. Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy; 15. Cardiocentro Ticino Institute, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Lugano, Switzerland

Background: The radial artery is recommended by international guidelines as the default vascular access in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) managed invasively. However, crossover from radial to femoral access is required in 4-10% of cases and has been associated with worse outcomes. No standardised algorithm exists to predict the risk of radial crossover.

Aims: We sought to derive and externally validate a risk score to predict radial crossover in patients with ACS managed invasively.

Methods: The derivation cohort consisted of 4,197 patients with ACS undergoing invasive management via the randomly allocated radial access from the MATRIX trial. Using logistic regression, we selected predictors of radial crossover and developed a numerical risk score. External validation was accomplished among 3,451 and 491 ACS patients managed invasively and randomised to radial access from the RIVAL and RIFLE-STEACS trials, respectively.

Results: The MATRIX score (age, height, smoking, renal failure, prior coronary artery bypass grafting, ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, Killip class, radial expertise) showed a c-index for radial crossover of 0.71 (95% CI: 0.67-0.75) in the derivation cohort. Discrimination ability was modest in the RIVAL (c-index: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.59-0.67) and RIFLE-STEACS (c-index: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.57-0.75) cohorts. A cut-off of ≥41 points was selected to identify patients at high risk of radial crossover.

Conclusions: The MATRIX score is a simple eight-item risk score which provides a standardised tool for the prediction of radial crossover among patients with ACS managed invasively. This tool can assist operators in anticipating and better addressing difficulties related to transradial procedures, potentially improving outcomes.

Sign in to read and download the full article

Forgot your password?
No account yet? Sign up for free!
Create my pcr account

Join us for free and access thousands of articles from EuroIntervention, as well as presentations, videos, cases from

Read next article
A European position paper on the management of patients with PFO; a mini focus on in-stent restenosis; RUC-4, a subcutaneous glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor; comparing stents according to DAPT duration in acute coronary syndromes; culprit lesion locations and outcomes in cardiogenic shock; fusing computed tomography angiography and real-time fluoroscopy in treating CTOs; failure and complications with coronary microcatheters; and more…