Patient preference regarding assessment of clinical follow-up after percutaneous coronary intervention: the PAPAYA study

EuroIntervention 2016;11:1487-1494 published online ahead of print October 2015. DOI: 10.4244/EIJY15M10_06

Marlies Kok
Marlies M. Kok1, MD; Clemens von Birgelen1,2*, MD, PhD; Ming Kai Lam1, MD, PhD; Marije M. Löwik1, PhD; K. Gert M. van Houwelingen1, MD; Martin G. Stoel1, MD, PhD; J. (Hans) W. Louwerenburg1, MD; Frits H.A.F. de Man1, MD, PhD; Marc Hartmann1, MD, PhD; Carine J.M. Doggen2, PhD; Janine A. van Til2, PhD; Maarten J. IJzerman2, PhD
1. Department of Cardiology, Thoraxcentrum Twente, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands; 2. Department of Health Technology and Services Research, MIRA, Institute for Biomedical Technology and Technical Medicine, University of Twente, Ensche

Aims: To keep patients in long-term clinical follow-up programmes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), knowledge of the patient-preferred mode for follow-up assessment is cruci

Sign in to read and download the full article

Forgot your password?

No account yet?
Sign up for free!

Create my pcr account

Join us for free and access thousands of articles from EuroIntervention, as well as presentations, videos, cases from

follow-up assessmentpatient preferencepercutaneous coronary intervention (pci)personalised (patient-centred) healthcarerandomised clinical trial
Coronary interventions
Read next article
Does access to invasive examination and treatment influence socioeconomic differences in case fatality for patients admitted for the first time with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction or unstable angina?

Latest news