Original Research

DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00948

Outcomes and predictors of left ventricle recovery in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Guy Witberg1, MD, MPH; Amos Levi1, MD; Yeela Talmor-Barkan1, MD, PhD; Marco Barbanti2,3, MD; Roberto Valvo3, MD; Giuliano Costa3, MD; Valentina Frittitta3, MD; Ole De Backer4, MD, PhD; Yannick Willemen4, MD; Mark van den Dorpel5, MD; Matias Mon6, MD; Atsushi Sugiura7, MD; Mitsumasa Sudo7, MD; Giulia Masiero8, MD; Edoardo Pancaldi9, MD; Dabit Arzamendi10, MD, PhD; Sandra Santos-Martinez11, MD; Jose A. Baz12, MD; Klemen Steblovnik13, MD, PhD; Victor Mauri14, MD; Matti Adam14, MD; Hendrik Wienemann14, MD; David Zahler15, MD; Manuel Hein16, MD; Philipp Ruile16, MD; Brídóg Nic Aodha17, MD; Carmelo Grasso3, MD; Luca Branca9, MD; Rodrigo Estévez-Loureiro12, MD; Ignacio J. Amat-Santos11, MD, PhD; Darren Mylotte17, MBBCh, MD, PhD; Matjaz Bunc13, MD, PhD; Giuseppe Tarantini8, MD, PhD; Luis Nombela-Franco6, MD, PhD; Lars Sondergaard4, MD; Nicolas M. van Mieghem5, MD, PhD; Ariel Finkelstein15, MD; Ran Kornowski1, MD

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Data on the likelihood of left ventricle (LV) recovery in patients with severe LV dysfunction and severe aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and its prognostic value are limited.

AIMS: We aimed to assess the likelihood of LV recovery following TAVI, examine its association with midterm mortality, and identify independent predictors of LV function.

METHODS: In our multicentre registry of 17 TAVI centres in Western Europe and Israel, patients were stratified by baseline LV function (ejection fraction [EF] >/≤30%) and LV response: no LV recovery, LV recovery (EF increase ≥10%), and LV normalisation (EF ≥50% post-TAVI).

RESULTS: Our analysis included 10,872 patients; baseline EF was ≤30% in 914 (8.4%) patients and >30% in 9,958 (91.6%) patients. The LV recovered in 544 (59.5%) patients, including 244 (26.7%) patients whose LV function normalised completely (EF >50%). Three-year mortality for patients without severe LV dysfunction at baseline was 29.4%. Compared to this, no LV recovery was associated with a significant increase in mortality (adjusted hazard ratio 1.32; p<0.001). Patients with similar LV function post-TAVI had similar rates of 3-year mortality, regardless of their baseline LV function. Three variables were associated with a higher likelihood of LV recovery following TAVI: no previous myocardial infarction (MI), estimated glomerular filtration rate >60 mL/min, and mean aortic valve gradient (mAVG) (expressed either as a continuous variable or as a binary variable using the standard low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis [AS] definition).

CONCLUSIONS: LV recovery following TAVI and the extent of this recovery are major determinants of midterm mortality in patients with severe AS and severe LV dysfunction undergoing TAVI. Patients with no previous MI and those with an mAVG >40 mmHg show the best results following TAVI, which are at least equivalent to those for patients without severe LV dysfunction. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04031274)

Sign in to read
the full article

Forgot your password?
No account yet?
Sign up for free!

Create my pcr account

Join us for free and access thousands of articles from EuroIntervention, as well as presentations, videos, cases from PCRonline.com

Volume 20 Number 8
Apr 15, 2024
Volume 20 Number 8
View full issue


Key metrics

Suggested by Cory

Clinical research

10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00817 Jun 19, 2023
Impact of early changes in cardiac damage following transcatheter aortic valve implantation
Zhou Y et al
free

Clinical research

10.4244/EIJ-D-19-00641 Mar 20, 2020
Outcomes of myocardial fibrosis in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement
Sugiura A et al
free

Original Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00442 Nov 18, 2024
Long-term survival after TAVI in low-flow, low-gradient aortic valve stenosis
Cardaioli F et al

10.4244/EIJV10I7A134 Nov 20, 2014
Low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis: should TAVI be the default therapeutic option?
O’Sullivan C and Wenaweser P
free

Editorial

10.4244/EIJ-E-24-00006 Apr 15, 2024
The miracle of left ventricular recovery after transcatheter aortic valve implantation
Dauerman H and Lahoud R
free
Trending articles
225.68

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00426 Dec 3, 2021
Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary artery disease
Lindahl B et al
free
105.78

Expert consensus

10.4244/EIJ-E-22-00018 Dec 4, 2023
Definitions and Standardized Endpoints for Treatment of Coronary Bifurcations
Lunardi M et al
free
77.85

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00840 Sep 2, 2024
Aortic regurgitation: from mechanisms to management
Baumbach A et al
free
68.7

Clinical research

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00545 Sep 20, 2022
Coronary lithotripsy for the treatment of underexpanded stents: the international; multicentre CRUNCH registry
Tovar Forero M et al
free
47.8

NEW INNOVATION

10.4244/EIJ-D-15-00467 Feb 20, 2018
Design and principle of operation of the HeartMate PHP (percutaneous heart pump)
Van Mieghem NM et al
free
45.3

Clinical research

10.4244/EIJ-D-18-01126 Aug 29, 2019
New-generation mechanical circulatory support during high-risk PCI: a cross-sectional analysis
Ameloot K et al
free
X

The Official Journal of EuroPCR and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI)

EuroPCR EAPCI
PCR ESC
Impact factor: 7.6
2023 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2024)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2024 Europa Group - All rights reserved