DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00445L

Letter: When is the optimal time point for detecting malapposition in coronary bifurcation trials?

Emil Nielsen Holck1,2, MD; Lene Nyhus Andreasen1,2, MD

We read with interest the paper by Watanabe et al investigating stent apposition in bifurcation lesions when the proximal optimisation technique (POT) was performed followed by side branch dilatation (SBD) versus the conventional kissing balloon inflation technique (KBT)1. We were pleased to read the paper and enjoyed the very well conducted quantitative optical coherence tomography (OCT) analysis. However, we have some concerns regarding the methodological approach and fear a false acceptance of the null hypothesis.

First, in the flow chart presented in Figure 1, we were pleased to see that OCT was performed immediately after initial treatment (POT+SBD or KBT). Analysis of this OCT pullback would clearly answer the research question whether POT+SBD would be superior in terms of stent apposition compared with KBT. Unfortunately, this analysis was not presented in the paper. Instead, all results presented were based on the final OCT pullback. In 40% (n=23) of cases in the POT+SBD group, additional stent optimisation was performed (either re-POT, SB dilatation or KBT) after the post-SBD OCT pullback (7% in the KBT group). Therefore, the study investigates another strategy than the one described in the aims and for which it was statistically powered. In its conclusion, the study accepted the null hypothesis, but this may be due to a type II error as elaborated below.

Second, we know from previous bench studies that stenting followed by SBD results in malapposition opposite the SB take-off (Figure 1A) and that this malapposition will be corrected by re-POT or KBT2,3. We speculate that the actual malapposition after initial treatment is higher and the study possesses a risk of underestimating the malapposition rate in the POT+SBD group, leading to a differential misclassification. Indeed, we agree that the operators needed to act on the OCT findings. We suggest that the authors perform a quantitative OCT analysis at the proposed step to investigate the risk of information bias.

Figure 1. Theoretical procedure versus actual procedure. A) Sketch of the research question. Proximal optimisation technique (POT) followed by side branch dilatation results in malapposition opposite the side branch take-off (left). Kissing balloon inflation technique (KBT) results in malapposition of the proximal part. B) Actual study procedure (right). KBT corrects malapposition opposite the SB. POT corrects malapposition in the proximal part.

Figure 1. Theoretical procedure versus actual procedure. A) Sketch of the research question. Proximal optimisation technique (POT) followed by side branch dilatation results in malapposition opposite the side branch take-off (left). Kissing balloon inflation technique (KBT) results in malapposition of the proximal part. B) Actual study procedure (right). KBT corrects malapposition opposite the SB. POT corrects malapposition in the proximal part.

Third, the KBT group was treated without initial POT after MV stenting. This step is recommended by the European Bifurcation Club and is a mandatory step to facilitate SB rewiring, expand the proximal stent and avoid abluminal rewiring. Finet and colleagues found in a bench study that the percentage of malapposed stent struts was significantly lower when KBT was preceded by POT4. Therefore, the rate of malapposition might by overestimated in the KBT group with a risk of a differential misclassification (Figure 1A).

Finally, in our opinion the rationale for using KBT in primarily non-true bifurcation lesions is insufficiently explained. Only 28% of the enrolled lesions were true bifurcation lesions, which are the lesions that really benefit from either KBT or SB opening (COBIS II study5).

We suggest that the authors consider performing the as treated analysis needed to investigate if POT+SBD is superior to KBT in terms of malapposition for side branch opening after provisional stenting of coronary bifurcation lesions. It is an important research question raised by Watanabe and colleagues and we hope that the authors will consider our comments.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare in relation to this paper.

Supplementary data

To read the full content of this article, please download the PDF.


References

Volume 17 Number 7
Sep 20, 2021
Volume 17 Number 7
View full issue


Key metrics

On the same subject

CLINICAL RESEARCH

10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00941 Jun 14, 2018
Benefit of a new provisional stenting strategy, the re-proximal optimisation technique: the rePOT clinical study
Derimay F et al
free

10.4244/EIJV13I15A282 Feb 2, 2018
Keep bifurcation stenting simple and cheap or controlled and optimised?
Holm N et al
free

Clinical research

10.4244/EIJ-D-20-01393 Dec 3, 2021
Clinical outcomes of the proximal optimisation technique (POT) in bifurcation stenting
Chevalier B et al
free
Trending articles
281.88

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00695 Nov 19, 2021
Transcatheter treatment for tricuspid valve disease
Praz F et al
free
243.2

State of the art

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-01117 Sep 20, 2022
Recanalisation of coronary chronic total occlusions
Di Mario C et al
free
208.35

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-01034 Jun 3, 2022
Management of in-stent restenosis
Alfonso F et al
free
168.7

Translational research

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00824 May 15, 2022
Bench test and in vivo evaluation of longitudinal stent deformation during proximal optimisation
Toth GG et al
free
167.05

Expert review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00690 May 15, 2022
Crush techniques for percutaneous coronary intervention of bifurcation lesions
Moroni F et al
free
151.03

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00776 Apr 3, 2023
Computed tomographic angiography in coronary artery disease
Serruys PW et al
free
118

Translational research

10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00718 Jun 5, 2023
Preclinical evaluation of the degradation kinetics of third-generation resorbable magnesium scaffolds
Seguchi M et al
110.35

Viewpoint

10.4244/EIJ-E-22-00007 May 15, 2022
TAVI at 20: how a crazy idea led to a clinical revolution
Eltchaninoff H et al
free
X

The Official Journal of EuroPCR and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI)

EuroPCR EAPCI
PCR ESC
Impact factor: 6.2
2022 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2023)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2024 Europa Group - All rights reserved