DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-18-00500L

Is transcatheter aortic valve implantation feasible in patients with chronic kidney disease?

Rajkumar Doshi1*, MD, MPH; Jay Shah2, MD

We read the article “Transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus conservative treatment in chronic kidney disease patients.” by Steinmetz et al1 with great interest. This is a “non-randomised” and “single-centre” study. The authors compared transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) to conservative medical therapy in stage 3-5 chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. They demonstrated that TAVI is associated with improved survival at one year compared to conservative therapy. This study is of vital importance as many of the physicians are hesitant to refer advanced stage CKD patients for TAVI as the data have been conflicting in previous studies. We agree that the prevalence of CKD is very high in aortic stenosis patients undergoing TAVI and that CKD alone is an independent predictor of adverse outcomes2. Many of the previous studies have demonstrated that TAVI is associated with fewer adverse events in advanced CKD patients when compared to surgical aortic valve replacement3,4. However, we have a few concerns which need to be clarified before these results gain wider uptake.

1. The results are not accompanied by the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) score or EuroSCORE II which are major determinants for a decision to perform TAVI in most cases.

2. All-cause mortality for the conservative group may not be sufficient. The authors need to include cardiovascular mortality as well.

3. How many patients were already on dialysis prior to the study? Additional information is warranted as to how many patients had acute kidney injury post TAVI and how many received dialysis post TAVI.

4. Did any patient receive TAVI or surgical repair/replacement after diagnosis of aortic stenosis in the conservative management group?

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Volume 14 Number 17
Apr 16, 2019
Volume 14 Number 17
View full issue


Key metrics

Suggested by Cory

CLINICAL RESEARCH

10.4244/EIJ-D-18-00058 Aug 3, 2018
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus conservative treatment in chronic kidney disease patients
Steinmetz T et al
free

Editorial

10.4244/EIJ-E-24-00006 Apr 15, 2024
The miracle of left ventricular recovery after transcatheter aortic valve implantation
Dauerman H and Lahoud R
free

10.4244/EIJV15I17A268 Apr 17, 2020
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in nonagenarians – old…but not obsolete!
Grube E and Sinning J
free
Trending articles
309.93

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00695 Nov 19, 2021
Transcatheter treatment for tricuspid valve disease
Praz F et al
free
166.7

Expert review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00690 May 15, 2022
Crush techniques for percutaneous coronary intervention of bifurcation lesions
Moroni F et al
free
92.45

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-20-01296 Aug 27, 2021
Management of cardiogenic shock
Thiele H et al
free
76

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00840 Sep 2, 2024
Aortic regurgitation: from mechanisms to management
Baumbach A et al
free
72.85

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00386 Feb 3, 2025
Mechanical circulatory support for complex, high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention
Ferro E et al
free
58.3

Clinical research

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00344 Sep 18, 2023
Clinical outcomes of TAVI with the Myval balloon-expandable valve for non-calcified aortic regurgitation
Sanchez-Luna JP et al
free
56.65

Clinical research

10.4244/EIJ-D-20-01155 Oct 20, 2021
A deep learning algorithm for detecting acute myocardial infarction
Liu W et al
free
33.9

CLINICAL RESEARCH

10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00381 Oct 11, 2017
Stent malapposition and the risk of stent thrombosis: mechanistic insights from an in vitro model
Foin N et al
free
33.65

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00606 Jan 1, 2024
Targeting inflammation in atherosclerosis: overview, strategy and directions
Waksman R et al
free
X

The Official Journal of EuroPCR and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI)

EuroPCR EAPCI
PCR ESC
Impact factor: 7.6
2023 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2024)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2025 Europa Group - All rights reserved