Clinical research

DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00186

Comparison of different percutaneous revascularisation timing strategies in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Tobias Rheude1, MD; Giuliano Costa2, MD; Flavio Luciano Ribichini3, MD; Thomas Pilgrim4, MD; Ignacio J. Amat Santos5, MD; Ole De Backer6, MD; Won‐Keun Kim7, MD; Henrique Barbosa Ribeiro8, MD; Francesco Saia9, MD; Matjaz Bunc10, MD; Didier Tchétché11, MD; Philippe Garot12, MD; Darren Mylotte13, MD; Francesco Burzotta14, MD; Yusuke Watanabe15, MD; Francesco Bedogni16, MD; Tullio Tesorio16, MD; Marco Tocci17, MD; Anna Franzone18, MD; Roberto Valvo19, MD; Mikko Savontaus20, MD; Hendrik Wienemann21, MD; Italo Porto22, MD; Caterina Gandolfo23, MD; Alessandro Iadanza24, MD; Alessandro S. Bortone25, MD, PhD; Markus Mach26, MD; Azeem Latib27, MD; Luigi Biasco28, MD; Maurizio Taramasso29, MD; Marco Zimarino30, MD; Daijiro Tomii4, MD; Philippe Nuyens6, MD; Lars Sondergaard31, MD, PhD; Sergio F. Camara8, MD; Tullio Palmerini9, MD; Mateusz Orzalkiewicz9, MD; Klemen Steblovnik10, MD; Bastien Degrelle11, MD; Alexandre Gautier12, MD; Paolo Alberto Del Sole3, MD; Andrea Mainardi3, MD; Michele Pighi3, MD; Mattia Lunardi3,13, MD, MSc; Hideyuki Kawashima15, MD; Enrico Criscione16, MD; Vincenzo Cesario32, MD; Fausto Biancari33, MD; Federico Zanin33, MD; Giovanni Esposito18, MD; Matti Adam21, MD; Eberhard Grube21, MD, PhD; Stephan Baldus21, MD; Vincenzo De Marzo22, MD; Elisa Piredda22, MD; Stefano Cannata23, MD; Fortunato Iacovelli25, MD, PhD; Martin Andreas26, MD, PhD; Valentina Frittitta19, MD; Elena Dipietro19, MD; Claudia Reddavid19, MD; Orazio Strazzieri19, MD; Silvia Motta19, MD; Domenico Angellotti18, MD; Carmelo Sgroi2, MD; Erion Xhepa1, MD; Faraj Kargoli27, MD; Corrado Tamburino2, MD, PhD; Michael Joner1, MD; Marco Barbanti2,34, MD

Abstract

Background: The optimal timing to perform percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) in transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) patients remains unknown.

Aims: We sought to compare different PCI timing strategies in TAVI patients.

Methods: The REVASC-TAVI registry is an international registry including patients undergoing TAVI with significant, stable coronary artery disease (CAD) at preprocedural workup. In this analysis, patients scheduled to undergo PCI before, after or concomitantly with TAVI were included. The main endpoints were all-cause death and a composite of all-cause death, stroke, myocardial infarction (MI) or rehospitalisation for congestive heart failure (CHF) at 2 years. Outcomes were adjusted using the inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) method.

Results: A total of 1,603 patients were included. PCI was performed before, after or concomitantly with TAVI in 65.6% (n=1,052), 9.8% (n=157) or 24.6% (n=394), respectively. At 2 years, all-cause death was significantly lower in patients undergoing PCI after TAVI as compared with PCI before or concomitantly with TAVI (6.8% vs 20.1% vs 20.6%; p<0.001). Likewise, the composite endpoint was significantly lower in patients undergoing PCI after TAVI as compared with PCI before or concomitantly with TAVI...

Sign in to read
the full article

Forgot your password?
No account yet?
Sign up for free!

Create my pcr account

Join us for free and access thousands of articles from EuroIntervention, as well as presentations, videos, cases from PCRonline.com

Volume 19 Number 7
Sep 18, 2023
Volume 19 Number 7
View full issue


Key metrics

On the same subject

10.4244/EIJV14I11A209 Dec 7, 2018
PCI in TAVI patients: who, why and when?
Patterson T et al
free

Debate

10.4244/EIJ-E-22-00038 Nov 18, 2022
PCI of bystander coronary artery lesions should be performed before TAVI: pros and cons
Amat-Santos I et al
free

Clinical research

10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00342 Nov 18, 2022
Long-term risk of unplanned percutaneous coronary intervention after transcatheter aortic valve replacement
Okuno T et al
free

Expert review

10.4244/EIJ-D-19-00788 Nov 15, 2019
Residual challenges in TAVI: moving forward
Barbanti M et al
free

EXPERT REVIEW

10.4244/EIJ-D-18-00544 Sep 7, 2018
Appraisal of key trials in aortic and mitral fields
Capranzano P et al
free

10.4244/EIJV11I4A76 Aug 20, 2015
CAD in TAVI patients: relevance of disease complexity
Stefanini G and Panico C
free
Trending articles
338.13

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00904 Apr 1, 2022
Antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention
Angiolillo D et al
free
296.43

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00695 Nov 19, 2021
Transcatheter treatment for tricuspid valve disease
Praz F et al
free
295.45

Expert consensus

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00898 Sep 20, 2022
Intravascular ultrasound guidance for lower extremity arterial and venous interventions
Secemsky E et al
free
226.03

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00426 Dec 3, 2021
Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary artery disease
Lindahl B et al
free
209.5

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-01034 Jun 3, 2022
Management of in-stent restenosis
Alfonso F et al
free
168.4

Expert review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00690 May 15, 2022
Crush techniques for percutaneous coronary intervention of bifurcation lesions
Moroni F et al
free
149.43

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00776 Apr 3, 2023
Computed tomographic angiography in coronary artery disease
Serruys PW et al
free
X

The Official Journal of EuroPCR and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI)

EuroPCR EAPCI
PCR ESC
Impact factor: 6.2
2022 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2023)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2024 Europa Group - All rights reserved