Image – Interventional flashlight

DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-19-00175

Intravascular lithotripsy in chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention

Lorenzo Azzalini1, MD, PhD; Barbara Bellini1, MD; Matteo Montorfano1, MD; Mauro Carlino1, MD

Figure 1. Intravascular lithotripsy in chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). A) Calcified ostial right coronary artery (RCA) CTO with recoiled stent (arrow) and (B) septal collaterals. C) Retrograde approach via septals and CTO crossing into the aorta. D) Incomplete expansion of 3.5 mm non-compliant (NC; left) and scoring (right) balloons. E) Intravascular lithotripsy (3.5 mm Shockwave; left), followed by balloon dilatation (4.0 mm NC; right), achieves better lesion preparation. F) Final result after implantation of two stents. G) Calcified mid RCA CTO with (H) septal collaterals. I) Rotational atherectomy (1.5 mm burr) on the proximal segment (top) and CTO (bottom). J) Underexpanded (arrow) 3.5 mm NC (top) and 3.0 mm scoring (bottom) balloons. K) Intravascular lithotripsy (3.5 mm Shockwave; top) and 3.5 mm NC balloon (bottom). L) Final result after implantation of three stents. MSA: minimal stent area

A 71-year-old man underwent ostial right coronary artery (RCA) in-stent chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The occluded ostial stent appeared recoiled due to extensive calcification (Figure 1A). A retrograde approach via septal collaterals (Figure 1B) was chosen, and the guidewire crossed into the aorta (Figure 1C). After snaring and externalisation, the ostium was dilated with non-compliant (NC) and scoring balloons, but lesion preparation was suboptimal (Figure 1D). Therefore, intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) with a 3.5 mm Shockwave balloon (Shockwave Medical, Santa Clara, CA, USA; 70 pulses) was performed, which was followed by dilatation with a 4.0 mm NC balloon, achieving good expansion (Figure 1E). Two stents were then implanted, with a good result (Figure 1F).

A 62-year-old man underwent recanalisation of a mid RCA CTO (Figure 1G, Figure 1H). The lesion was crossed antegradely but, due to massive calcification, no balloon could be advanced. Rotational atherectomy (1.5 mm burr) was performed (Figure 1I). NC and scoring balloons could not expand adequately (Figure 1J). IVL (3.5 mm Shockwave) was then performed (20 pulses), followed by dilatation with a 3.5 mm NC balloon, which achieved optimal expansion (Figure 1K). Three stents were implanted, with a good result (Figure 1L).

Moderate/severe calcification is frequently found in CTOs. While atherectomy is effective in treating extensively calcified vessels, its use is not devoid of challenges and complications, particularly in difficult subsets such as CTOs (subintimal recanalisation, dissection planes, etc.)1.

IVL represents a novel alternative to achieve plaque modification in calcified lesions. Its ease of use, efficacy (sonic pressure waves are distributed uniformly across the inflated balloon, addressing calcium irrespective of its circumferential/eccentric location), and safety (IVL creates mechanical energy lasting <2 µs during low-pressure inflation, minimising vascular injury) make it particularly appealing to treat calcified CTOs. However, the high crossing profile (0.043”-0.046”) of the Shockwave catheter sometimes requires prior lesion preparation with rotational atherectomy to allow balloon delivery.

Conflict of interest statement

L. Azzalini received honoraria from Abbott Vascular, Guerbet, Terumo, and Sahajanand Medical Technologies; and research support from ACIST Medical Systems, Guerbet, and Terumo. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Volume 15 Number 11
Dec 6, 2019
Volume 15 Number 11
View full issue


Key metrics

Suggested by Cory

Image – Interventional flashlight

10.4244/EIJ-D-18-00780 May 20, 2019
Intravascular lithotripsy to treat a severely underexpanded coronary stent
Watkins S et al
free

Clinical research

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00545 Sep 20, 2022
Coronary lithotripsy for the treatment of underexpanded stents: the international; multicentre CRUNCH registry
Tovar Forero M et al
free

Expert review

10.4244/EIJ-D-18-01056 Oct 18, 2019
Intravascular lithotripsy for calcific coronary and peripheral artery stenoses
Dini C et al
free

Short report

10.4244/EIJ-D-19-01052 May 20, 2020
Intravascular lithotripsy for lesion preparation in patients with calcific distal left main disease
Cosgrove C et al
free

Image – Interventional flashlight

10.4244/EIJ-D-19-00268 Jul 17, 2020
Intravascular lithotripsy for recurrent restenosis caused by severe calcific neoatherosclerosis
Salazar C et al
free

10.4244/EIJV7I3A65 Jul 29, 2011
How should I treatsevere calcific coronary artery disease?
Fernandez J et al
free
Trending articles
312.73

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00695 Nov 19, 2021
Transcatheter treatment for tricuspid valve disease
Praz F et al
free
241.95

State of the art

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-01117 Sep 20, 2022
Recanalisation of coronary chronic total occlusions
Di Mario C et al
free
153.78

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00776 Apr 3, 2023
Computed tomographic angiography in coronary artery disease
Serruys PW et al
free
110.9

Clinical research

10.4244/EIJ-D-20-00130 Oct 9, 2020
Double-kissing culotte technique for coronary bifurcation stenting
Toth GG et al
free
105.53

Expert consensus

10.4244/EIJ-E-22-00018 Dec 4, 2023
Definitions and Standardized Endpoints for Treatment of Coronary Bifurcations
Lunardi M et al
free
78.25

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00840 Sep 2, 2024
Aortic regurgitation: from mechanisms to management
Baumbach A et al
free
43.4

Clinical research

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00590 Dec 4, 2023
Prognostic impact of cardiac damage staging classification in each aortic stenosis subtype undergoing TAVI
Nakase M et al
free
34.75

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00606 Jan 1, 2024
Targeting inflammation in atherosclerosis: overview, strategy and directions
Waksman R et al
free
X

The Official Journal of EuroPCR and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI)

EuroPCR EAPCI
PCR ESC
Impact factor: 7.6
2023 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2024)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2025 Europa Group - All rights reserved