Editorial

DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-E-25-00007

Intracoronary brachytherapy: will it rise from the ashes?

Manel Sabaté1, MD, PhD

Intravascular brachytherapy (IVBT) was implemented in clinical practice in late 1990s, before the advent of drug-eluting stents (DES). The rationale for its use was the ability of radiation therapy to treat proliferative benign processes such as exuberant keloid scar formation or ocular pterygia, among others12. In-stent restenosis (ISR) was considered a prime target for IVBT, as it is mainly induced by an excess of neointimal proliferation. In this context, IVBT demonstrated an outstanding reduction in the rate of repeat revascularisation345. However, several limitations offset its initial benefit, such as late thrombosis, edge effect and late catch-up phenomenon6789. Further, the logistics and the regulatory process to implement IVBT in the cath lab were cumbersome, limiting its widespread adoption. Eventually, the subsequent development of DES sidelined the technique in most cath labs around the world.

In this issue of EuroIntervention, Tanner et al report the 3-year outcomes of patients with multilayer drug-eluting ISR treated with IVBT10. This was an observational retrospective study that comprised patients treated with and without IVBT between 2012 and...

Sign in to read
the full article

Forgot your password?
No account yet?
Sign up for free!

Create my pcr account

Join us for free and access thousands of articles from EuroIntervention, as well as presentations, videos, cases from PCRonline.com

Volume 21 Number 7
Apr 7, 2025
Volume 21 Number 7
View full issue


Key metrics

Suggested by Cory

10.4244/EIJV9I7A129 Nov 29, 2013
Management of recurrent in-stent restenosis: onion skin full metal jacket?
Alfonso F and Scheller B
free

May 19, 2009
Treatment of patients with in-stent restenosis
Alfonso F et al
free

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-01034 Jun 3, 2022
Management of in-stent restenosis
Alfonso F et al
free

Debate

10.4244/EIJ-E-24-00062 Jan 20, 2025
Drug-coated balloon angioplasty for in-stent restenosis: pros and cons
Alfonso F et al
Trending articles
69.746

10.4244/EIJV13I12A217 Dec 8, 2017
Swimming against the tide: insights from the ORBITA trial
Al-Lamee R and Francis D
free
58.8

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00066 Apr 21, 2025
Management of complications after valvular interventions
Bansal A et al
free
57.6

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00386 Feb 3, 2025
Mechanical circulatory support for complex, high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention
Ferro E et al
free
38.75

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00912 Oct 7, 2024
Optical coherence tomography to guide percutaneous coronary intervention
Almajid F et al
free
15.85

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-01050 Jul 15, 2024
Durability of transcatheter aortic valve implantation
Ternacle J et al
free
11.8

EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH

10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00595 Jan 19, 2018
Videodensitometric quantification of paravalvular regurgitation of a transcatheter aortic valve: in vitro validation
Abdelghani M et al
free
X

The Official Journal of EuroPCR and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI)

EuroPCR EAPCI
PCR ESC
Impact factor: 7.6
2023 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2024)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2025 Europa Group - All rights reserved