The Official Journal of EuroPCR and the European Association of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions (EAPCI)

Interventions for valvular disease and heart failure - Mini focus on tricuspid regurgitation

Predictors and prognostic relevance of tricuspid alterations in patients undergoing transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair

EuroIntervention 2021;17:827-834. DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-20-01094

1. Department of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany; 2. Department of Cardiology, Angiology, Pneumology and Medical Intensive Care, Heart Center of the University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; 3. Department of Cardiology, Pulmonology and Vascular Medicine, Heinrich-Heine University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany

Background: Mitral valve repair may lead to alterations of tricuspid regurgitation (TR).

Aims: We aimed to investigate alterations, predictors and prognostic relevance of TR evolution in a large-scale multicentre population of patients undergoing transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVR) via the MitraClip.

Methods: In total, we included 531 TMVR patients with at least one available follow-up echocardiography. TR improvement was defined as a TR ≥II at baseline, which showed a decline of at least one TR categorisation.

Results: Distribution of preprocedural TR severity was TR 0/I 41% (220/531), TR II 39% (209/531) and TR ≥III 19% (102/531), respectively. Follow-up echocardiography was at 308±187 days. TR severity improved to TR 0/I 49% (259/531), TR II 35% (183/531) and TR III 17% (89/531), p=0.003. Out of 311 patients with TR ≥II at baseline, 41% (127/311) showed TR improvement. Atrial fibrillation (AF), residual mitral regurgitation ≥II (rMR) and tricuspid annular diameter (TAD) remained variables which prevented TR improvement (odds ratio 0.49 [0.29-0.84], 0.47 [0.27-0.81] and 0.97 [0.93-0.997], respectively). TR improvement was associated with better event-free survival regarding post-procedural heart failure hospitalisation (HHF) (hazard ratio 0.6 [0.38-0.94]). The main changes of TR severity occurred within 3 months post TMVR (p=0.006), while there were only minor TR changes between 3 and 12 months of follow-up (p=0.813).

Conclusions: TR improvement was frequent after TMVR. Predictors preventing TR improvement were AF, post-procedural rMR, and TAD. Furthermore, TR improvement was an early phenomenon occurring primarily within the first three months post TMVR and served as a suitable marker of reduced HHF.

Sign in to read and download the full article

Forgot your password?
No account yet? Sign up for free!
Create my pcr account

Join us for free and access thousands of articles from EuroIntervention, as well as presentations, videos, cases from

Read next article
Coronary artery cannulation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation