The Official Journal of EuroPCR and the European Association of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions (EAPCI)
INTERVENTIONS FOR HYPERTENSION AND STROKE
Endovascular treatment vs. intravenous thrombolysis alone for ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
Giuseppe Ferrante1*, MD, PhD; Nunzio Paolo Nuzzi2, MD; Giulio Giuseppe Stefanini1, MD, PhD; Francesco Asteggiano2, MD; Simona Marcheselli3, MD; Gianluigi Condorelli4,5, MD, PhD; Bernhard Reimers1, MD
1. Division of Clinical and Interventional Cardiology, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano, Milan, Italy; 2. Division of Interventional Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, Humanitas Clinical and Rese
Aims: Our aim was to assess the effects on clinical outcomes of endovascular treatment vs. thrombolysis alone in patients with ischaemic stroke.
Sign in to read and download the full article
Forgot your password? No account yet?
Sign up for free!
Create my pcr account Join us for free and access thousands of articles from EuroIntervention, as well as presentations, videos, cases from PCRonline.com
acute ischaemic strokeendovascular treatmentlytic
Interventions for strokeIschaemic strokeTools, devices and techniques
Read next article
Endovascular ultrasound for renal sympathetic denervation in patients with therapy-resistant hypertension not responding to radiofrequency renal sympathetic denervation