Debate

DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-E-24-00071

Could the age threshold for TAVI be relaxed to below 65 years? Pros and cons

Philippe Garot1, MD; Mariama Akodad1, MD, PhD; Mateo Marin-Cuartas2, MD; Michael A. Borger2, MD, PhD

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has emerged as the treatment of choice for symptomatic severe aortic stenosis (AS) across the whole surgical risk spectrum. Current European guidelines recommend surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) for patients under 75 years at low surgical risk, whereas American guidelines advocate for shared decision-making between SAVR and TAVI in patients aged 65 to 80 years, taking into account life expectancy and valve durability. Although SAVR with mechanical valves offers excellent durability, it is partially offset by significant challenges, including a higher thrombotic risk and the lifelong need for anticoagulation. In addition, recent TAVI trials have shown potential benefits for younger, lower-risk populations, generating a growing interest in expanding its indications. Based on all these considerations, whether the age threshold for TAVI should be lowered below 65 years remains a topic of debate.

Pros

Philippe Garot, MD; Mariama Akodad, MD, PhD

Over the past two decades, TAVI has become the standard treatment for symptomatic AS in high-, intermediate-, and low-risk patients. With proven efficacy and increasing safety, TAVI’s applications are expanding. The recent EARLY TAVR...

Sign in to read
the full article

Forgot your password?
No account yet?
Sign up for free!

Create my pcr account

Join us for free and access thousands of articles from EuroIntervention, as well as presentations, videos, cases from PCRonline.com

Volume 21 Number 8
Apr 21, 2025
Volume 21 Number 8
View full issue


Key metrics

Trending articles
166.7

Expert review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00690 May 15, 2022
Crush techniques for percutaneous coronary intervention of bifurcation lesions
Moroni F et al
free
92.45

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-20-01296 Aug 27, 2021
Management of cardiogenic shock
Thiele H et al
free
72.85

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00386 Feb 3, 2025
Mechanical circulatory support for complex, high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention
Ferro E et al
free
60.55

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00066 Apr 21, 2025
Management of complications after valvular interventions
Bansal A et al
free
58.3

Clinical research

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00344 Sep 18, 2023
Clinical outcomes of TAVI with the Myval balloon-expandable valve for non-calcified aortic regurgitation
Sanchez-Luna JP et al
free
56.65

Clinical research

10.4244/EIJ-D-20-01155 Oct 20, 2021
A deep learning algorithm for detecting acute myocardial infarction
Liu W et al
free
33.9

CLINICAL RESEARCH

10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00381 Oct 11, 2017
Stent malapposition and the risk of stent thrombosis: mechanistic insights from an in vitro model
Foin N et al
free
33.65

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00606 Jan 1, 2024
Targeting inflammation in atherosclerosis: overview, strategy and directions
Waksman R et al
free
X

The Official Journal of EuroPCR and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI)

EuroPCR EAPCI
PCR ESC
Impact factor: 7.6
2023 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2024)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2025 Europa Group - All rights reserved