Debate

DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-E-24-00071

Could the age threshold for TAVI be relaxed to below 65 years? Pros and cons

Philippe Garot1, MD; Mariama Akodad1, MD, PhD; Mateo Marin-Cuartas2, MD; Michael A. Borger2, MD, PhD

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has emerged as the treatment of choice for symptomatic severe aortic stenosis (AS) across the whole surgical risk spectrum. Current European guidelines recommend surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) for patients under 75 years at low surgical risk, whereas American guidelines advocate for shared decision-making between SAVR and TAVI in patients aged 65 to 80 years, taking into account life expectancy and valve durability. Although SAVR with mechanical valves offers excellent durability, it is partially offset by significant challenges, including a higher thrombotic risk and the lifelong need for anticoagulation. In addition, recent TAVI trials have shown potential benefits for younger, lower-risk populations, generating a growing interest in expanding its indications. Based on all these considerations, whether the age threshold for TAVI should be lowered below 65 years remains a topic of debate.

Pros

Philippe Garot, MD; Mariama Akodad, MD, PhD

Over the past two decades, TAVI has become the standard treatment for symptomatic AS in high-, intermediate-, and low-risk patients. With proven efficacy and increasing safety, TAVI’s applications are expanding. The recent EARLY TAVR...

Sign in to read
the full article

Forgot your password?
No account yet?
Sign up for free!

Create my pcr account

Join us for free and access thousands of articles from EuroIntervention, as well as presentations, videos, cases from PCRonline.com

Volume 21 Number 8
Apr 21, 2025
Volume 21 Number 8
View full issue


Key metrics

Trending articles
96.55

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00066 Apr 21, 2025
Management of complications after valvular interventions
Bansal A et al
free
66.9

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00992 Sep 15, 2025
Antithrombotic therapy in complex percutaneous coronary intervention
Castiello D et al
free
56.6

Original Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-00331 May 21, 2025
One-month dual antiplatelet therapy followed by prasugrel monotherapy at a reduced dose: the 4D-ACS randomised trial
Jang Y et al
open access
56.6

Original Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-00331 Jul 21, 2025
One-month dual antiplatelet therapy followed by prasugrel monotherapy at a reduced dose: the 4D-ACS randomised trial
Jang Y et al
open access
35.45

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00448 Jan 15, 2024
Coronary spasm and vasomotor dysfunction as a cause of MINOCA
Yaker ZS et al
free
X

PCR
Impact factor: 9.5
2024 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2025)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2025 Europa Group - All rights reserved