Debate

DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-E-24-00071

Could the age threshold for TAVI be relaxed to below 65 years? Pros and cons

Philippe Garot1, MD; Mariama Akodad1, MD, PhD; Mateo Marin-Cuartas2, MD; Michael A. Borger2, MD, PhD

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has emerged as the treatment of choice for symptomatic severe aortic stenosis (AS) across the whole surgical risk spectrum. Current European guidelines recommend surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) for patients under 75 years at low surgical risk, whereas American guidelines advocate for shared decision-making between SAVR and TAVI in patients aged 65 to 80 years, taking into account life expectancy and valve durability. Although SAVR with mechanical valves offers excellent durability, it is partially offset by significant challenges, including a higher thrombotic risk and the lifelong need for anticoagulation. In addition, recent TAVI trials have shown potential benefits for younger, lower-risk populations, generating a growing interest in expanding its indications. Based on all these considerations, whether the age threshold for TAVI should be lowered below 65 years remains a topic of debate.

Pros

Philippe Garot, MD; Mariama Akodad, MD, PhD

Over the past two decades, TAVI has become the standard treatment for symptomatic AS in high-, intermediate-, and low-risk patients. With proven efficacy and increasing safety, TAVI’s applications are expanding. The recent EARLY TAVR...

Sign in to read
the full article

Forgot your password?
No account yet?
Sign up for free!

Create my pcr account

Join us for free and access thousands of articles from EuroIntervention, as well as presentations, videos, cases from PCRonline.com

Volume 21 Number 8
Apr 21, 2025
Volume 21 Number 8
View full issue


Key metrics

Trending articles
56.85

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00386 Feb 3, 2025
Mechanical circulatory support for complex, high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention
Ferro E et al
free
39.45

Clinical research

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00725 Nov 19, 2023
A systematic algorithm for large-bore arterial access closure after TAVI: the TAVI-MultiCLOSE study
Rosseel L et al
free
39.45

Original Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00725 Mar 18, 2024
A systematic algorithm for large-bore arterial access closure after TAVI: the TAVI-MultiCLOSE study
Rosseel L et al
free
36.25

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00448 Jan 15, 2024
Coronary spasm and vasomotor dysfunction as a cause of MINOCA
Yaker ZS et al
free
35.15

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00895 Apr 1, 2024
Percutaneous interventions for pulmonary embolism
Finocchiaro S et al
free
28.5

CLINICAL RESEARCH

10.4244/EIJV11I1A6 May 19, 2015
European expert consensus on rotational atherectomy
Barbato E et al
free
15.95

Debate

10.4244/EIJ-E-24-00072 Mar 17, 2025
Routine diagnosis of ANOCA/INOCA: pros and cons
Montone R et al
free
X

The Official Journal of EuroPCR and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI)

EuroPCR EAPCI
PCR ESC
Impact factor: 7.6
2023 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2024)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2025 Europa Group - All rights reserved