Editorial

DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-E-25-00045

Angiographic-based assessment of microvascular dysfunction: quo vadis?

Christos V. Bourantas1,2, MD, PhD; Yoshinobu Onuma3,4, MD, PhD; Hector M. Garcia-Garcia5, MD, PhD; Patrick W. Serruys3,4, MD, PhD

Over recent years there has been a revolution in the applications of coronary angiography in the assessment of coronary artery pathology. Computerised methodologies have been introduced that are able to process coronary artery models reconstructed from angiographic images and accurately evaluate lesion haemodynamic severity, plaque deformability, and peripheral vascular resistance. Despite the inherent limitations of angiography to quantify lumen dimensions and measure coronary flow, cumulative evidence supports the validity of this concept. Methodologies developed to compute the fractional flow reserve (FFR) are now indicated by European guidelines in treatment planning: radial wall strain, which measures the changes in lumen dimensions during the cardiac cycle in order to assess the mechanical properties of plaque, has been found able to detect vulnerable lesions1, while solutions that were proposed to measure microvascular resistance from coronary angiography (Figure 1) seem able to provide useful prognostic information and predict microvascular obstruction (MVO) and infarct size post-revascularisation in patients with an acute coronary syndrome234.

In this issue of EuroIntervention, Zhang et al examined for the first time the efficacy of the...

Sign in to read
the full article

Forgot your password?
No account yet?
Sign up for free!

Create my pcr account

Join us for free and access thousands of articles from EuroIntervention, as well as presentations, videos, cases from PCRonline.com

Volume 21 Number 17
Sep 1, 2025
Volume 21 Number 17
View full issue


Key metrics

Suggested by Cory

EXPERT REVIEW

10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00465 Aug 25, 2017
State of the art: coronary angiography
Collet C et al
free

EXPERT REVIEW

10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00503 Aug 25, 2017
State of the art: pressure wire and coronary functional assessment
Echavarria-Pinto M et al
free

Clinical Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00471 Apr 22, 2022
Vessel fractional flow reserve (vFFR) for the assessment of stenosis severity: the FAST II study
Masdjedi K et al
free

10.4244/EIJV13I2A20 Jun 2, 2017
Coronary physiological parameters at a crossroads
Davies J et al
free
Trending articles
87.2

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-00266 Jan 19, 2026
Lesion stratification with intracoronary imaging
McGarvey M et al
free
47.45

NEW INNOVATION

10.4244/EIJ-D-15-00467 Feb 20, 2018
Design and principle of operation of the HeartMate PHP (percutaneous heart pump)
Van Mieghem NM et al
free
34.8

Original Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-01006 Mar 16, 2026
Clinical outcomes and haemodynamic response after blinded stress assessment of moderate aortic stenosis
Eerdekens R et al
22.2

Viewpoint

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-01066 May 4, 2026
Intracoronary imaging guidance for de novo coronary lesion treatment with drug-coated balloons
Amabile N et al
free
20.75

Flashlight

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-01014 Apr 6, 2026
Stent retriever-assisted coronary thrombectomy with continuous aspiration
Liabot Q et al
open access
19.5

Original Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-26-00032 May 15, 2026
Glucocorticoids to reduce permanent pacemaker implantation after TAVI: the GLUCO-TAVI randomised trial
Fuertes-Kenneally L et al
17.8

Expert Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-01316 Apr 20, 2026
Electrosurgical laceration and stabilisation of tricuspid edge-to-edge repair: the ELASTA-T technique
Alvarez-Covarrubias H et al
free
X

PCR
Impact factor: 9.5
2024 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2025)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2026 Europa Group - All rights reserved