Editorial

DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-26-00601

Unloading the clock: when timing meets physiology in STEMI shock

Jacob E. Møller1,2, MD, PhD, DMSc; Benedikt Schrage3, MD, PhD

In this issue of EuroIntervention, Nagai and associates present a registry-based study to analyse the association between the time taken from hospital arrival to the placement of a microaxial flow pump (mAFP) – door-to-unload time – and in-hospital mortality in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI)-related cardiogenic shock (CS).1 The study was based on data from the Japan Registry for Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices. In total, 1,783 contemporary STEMI-CS patients who underwent mAFP placement were analysed. Of these 1,783 patients, 73% had no temporary mechanical circulatory support (MCS) at the time of mAFP placement, 23% were on venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO), and a minority of patients were on an intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP). The main analysis merged these cohorts and demonstrated that in-hospital mortality increased with a longer door-to-unload time, from 33% when the door-to-unload time was ≤60 min to 48% when the door-to-unload time exceeded 150 min. The same pattern was found when patients were stratified by no prior MCS or use of an MCS at mAFP placement. Predictors of delayed mAFP placement included older age,...

Sign in to read
the full article

Forgot your password?
No account yet?
Sign up for free!

Create my pcr account

Join us for free and access thousands of articles from EuroIntervention, as well as presentations, videos, cases from PCRonline.com

Volume 22 Number 12
Jun 15, 2026
Volume 22 Number 12
View full issue


Key metrics

Suggested by Cory

Editorial

10.4244/EIJ-E-24-00038 Aug 19, 2024
Impella – a treatment for all STEMI patients with cardiogenic shock? The effect of off-hours admission
Engstrøm T and Madsen J
free

10.4244/EIJV11I5A99 Sep 22, 2015
Time, space and leaps of faith
Dauerman H
free

10.4244/EIJV13I18A344 Apr 6, 2018
Mechanical circulatory support: the last resort in cardiogenic shock?
Thiele H et al
free

Editorial

10.4244/EIJ-E-23-00029 Aug 21, 2023
VA-ECMO in cardiogenic shock: is the road closed or open?
Thiele H and Freund A
free
Trending articles
334.45

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00904 Apr 1, 2022
Antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention
Angiolillo D et al
free
83.8

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00840 Sep 2, 2024
Aortic regurgitation: from mechanisms to management
Baumbach A et al
free
42.15

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-00896 Apr 6, 2026
Pretreatment with antiplatelet agents in patients undergoing coronary revascularisation
Kaur G et al
free
37.95

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00195 Apr 7, 2025
Percutaneous coronary intervention for calcified and resistant lesions
Pesarini G et al
free
33.05

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-00874 Jun 1, 2026
TAVI and coronary interventions: indications, technical considerations, and clinical scenarios
Aquino Bruno H et al
free
28.6

Original Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-01370 May 21, 2026
Prognostic value of early haemodynamic valve deterioration after TAVI
Trimaille A et al
28.6

Original Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-01370 Jun 1, 2026
Prognostic value of early haemodynamic valve deterioration after TAVI
Trimaille A et al
19.25

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00387 Jul 21, 2025
Advances in coronary imaging of atherosclerotic plaques
Garcia-Garcia H et al
free
X

PCR
Impact factor: 9.2
2025 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2026)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2026 Europa Group - All rights reserved