Snapshot

DOI:

Sirolimus- versus paclitaxel-coated balloons in the treatment of coronary lesions; natural history of newly developing calcified nodules; treating DES restenosis with either ultrathin-strut vs thin-strut DES vs drug-eluting balloons; rationale and design of the TAILORED-CHIP trial; and more...

Whether you’re looking for a comparison of drug-eluting balloons, choosing between a type of stent or balloon to treat DES in-stent restenosis, or just interested in the timing for antiplatelet therapy in high-risk PCIs, we’ve got you covered in this issue of EuroIntervention!

How does sirolimus compare as a valid alternative to paclitaxel in drug-coated balloons? That’s the subject of an article by Bruno Scheller, Franz Kleber and colleagues comparing a novel sirolimus-coated balloon to a clinically proven paclitaxel-coated balloon in patients with de novo coronary lesions. The sirolimus-coated balloon was seen to be non-inferior at six months to the paclitaxel-coated balloon concerning angiographic evidence of late lumen loss, with no difference in clinical events at 12 months between the two devices.

Yoichiro Sugizaki, Akiko Maehara and colleagues investigate the natural history of new calcified nodules attempting to identify how their emergence relates to underlying plaque characteristics. The authors used serial optical coherence tomography to find that the formation of new calcified nodules is associated with untreated lesions that have large amounts of calcium, calcium with signal attenuation, and greater hinge motion, and was associated with worse clinical outcomes.

Ovidio De Filippo, Fabrizio D’Ascenzo and colleagues explore the efficacy and safety of ultrathin-strut drug-eluting stents (DES) versus thin-strut DES or drug- eluting balloons (DEB) for treating in-stent restenosis in existing DES. They find that the ultrathin-strut DES may be associated with a lower target lesion revascularisation risk compared with thin-strut DES or DEB in diffuse DES restenosis and may yield comparable outcomes for focal DES in-stent restenosis as well.

Hanbit Park, Duk-Woo Park and colleagues present the design and rationale of the ongoing TAILORED-CHIP trial which is studying patients undergoing complex high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). These patients were randomised to either a time-dependent tailored antithrombotic strategy with an early escalation and a late de-escalation, or to a conventional dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). The primary endpoint is a net benefit clinical endpoint.

Volume 20 Number 21
Nov 4, 2024
Volume 20 Number 21
View full issue


Key metrics

Suggested by Cory

Editorial

10.4244/EIJ-E-24-00053 Nov 4, 2024
The future of sirolimus-coated balloon use in percutaneous coronary intervention
Yeh R and Lalani C
free

Original Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00868 Nov 4, 2024
A randomised trial of sirolimus- versus paclitaxel-coated balloons for de novo coronary lesions
Scheller B et al

Debate

10.4244/EIJ-E-23-00034 Jan 15, 2024
Drug-coated balloons as a first choice for patients with de novo lesions: pros and cons
Colombo A et al
free
Trending articles
154.65

Clinical research

10.4244/EIJ-D-20-01125 Oct 20, 2021
An upfront combined strategy for endovascular haemostasis in transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation
Costa G et al
free
151.68

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00776 Apr 3, 2023
Computed tomographic angiography in coronary artery disease
Serruys PW et al
free
55.9

Clinical research

10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00621 Feb 20, 2023
Long-term changes in coronary physiology after aortic valve replacement
Sabbah M et al
free
54.9

Expert review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-01010 Jun 24, 2022
Device-related thrombus following left atrial appendage occlusion
Simard T et al
free
43.75

Clinical Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-01091 Aug 5, 2022
Lifetime management of patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis: a computed tomography simulation study
Medranda G et al
free
X

The Official Journal of EuroPCR and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI)

EuroPCR EAPCI
PCR ESC
Impact factor: 7.6
2023 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2024)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2024 Europa Group - All rights reserved