Editorial

DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-E-24-00053

The future of sirolimus-coated balloon use in percutaneous coronary intervention

Robert W. Yeh1,2, MD, MSc; Christina Lalani1,2, MD

Paclitaxel drug-coated balloons (DCBs) have become a mainstay for treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis (ISR) for more than a decade in Europe, more recently in Asia, and are now available for this indication in the United States12. More recently, there has been a surge in interest in exploring the utility of DCBs in de novo coronary disease, as a means of potentially averting the year-on-year growth in adverse events attributable to stented vessels3. In addition, a number of manufacturers have invested in the development of new DCBs employing non-paclitaxel active ingredients, most commonly sirolimus. With these developments come important questions about the use of DCBs in coronary disease: in which lesions should DCBs be used, and which DCBs are most effective for use?

In this issue of EuroIntervention, Scheller et al aim to address the latter question by comparing rates of late lumen loss (LLL) between patients with de novo lesions who received paclitaxel-coated balloon (PCB) versus sirolimus-coated balloon (SCB) therapy (the SeQuent SCB [B. Braun])4. The authors found no significant difference in LLL between patients who...

Sign in to read
the full article

Forgot your password?
No account yet?
Sign up for free!

Create my pcr account

Join us for free and access thousands of articles from EuroIntervention, as well as presentations, videos, cases from PCRonline.com

Volume 20 Number 21
Nov 4, 2024
Volume 20 Number 21
View full issue


Key metrics

Suggested by Cory

Editorial

10.4244/EIJ-E-23-00052 Mar 18, 2024
Comparative preclinical assessment of drug-coated balloons: a blessing and a curse for clinical translation
Joner M and Wild L
free

10.4244/EIJV8I4A70 Aug 24, 2012
Comparison of two drug-eluting balloons: a report from the SCAAR registry
Bondesson P et al
free

May 17, 2011
From bench to Paccocath
Cremers B and Scheller B
free
Trending articles
318.1

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00695 Nov 19, 2021
Transcatheter treatment for tricuspid valve disease
Praz F et al
free
116.75

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00066 Apr 21, 2025
Management of complications after valvular interventions
Bansal A et al
free
108.3

Viewpoint

10.4244/EIJ-E-22-00007 May 15, 2022
TAVI at 20: how a crazy idea led to a clinical revolution
Eltchaninoff H et al
free
91.6

Image – Interventional flashlight

10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00344 Aug 5, 2022
First dedicated transcatheter leaflet splitting device: the ShortCut device
Tchétché D et al
free
71.3

State-of-the-art

10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00627 Feb 6, 2023
Left atrial appendage occlusion
Holmes D et al
free
68.9

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00992 Sep 15, 2025
Antithrombotic therapy in complex percutaneous coronary intervention
Castiello D et al
free
60.65

Clinical research

10.4244/EIJ-D-20-01155 Oct 20, 2021
A deep learning algorithm for detecting acute myocardial infarction
Liu W et al
free
49.55

CLINICAL RESEARCH

10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00962 Apr 6, 2018
A new optical coherence tomography-based calcium scoring system to predict stent underexpansion
Fujino A et al
free
43.45

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00145 Sep 20, 2021
Robotics, imaging, and artificial intelligence in the catheterisation laboratory
Beyar R et al
free
X

PCR
Impact factor: 9.5
2024 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2025)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2025 Europa Group - All rights reserved