Editorial

DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-E-24-00053

The future of sirolimus-coated balloon use in percutaneous coronary intervention

Robert W. Yeh1,2, MD, MSc; Christina Lalani1,2, MD

Paclitaxel drug-coated balloons (DCBs) have become a mainstay for treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis (ISR) for more than a decade in Europe, more recently in Asia, and are now available for this indication in the United States12. More recently, there has been a surge in interest in exploring the utility of DCBs in de novo coronary disease, as a means of potentially averting the year-on-year growth in adverse events attributable to stented vessels3. In addition, a number of manufacturers have invested in the development of new DCBs employing non-paclitaxel active ingredients, most commonly sirolimus. With these developments come important questions about the use of DCBs in coronary disease: in which lesions should DCBs be used, and which DCBs are most effective for use?

In this issue of EuroIntervention, Scheller et al aim to address the latter question by comparing rates of late lumen loss (LLL) between patients with de novo lesions who received paclitaxel-coated balloon (PCB) versus sirolimus-coated balloon (SCB) therapy (the SeQuent SCB [B. Braun])4. The authors found no significant difference in LLL between patients who...

Sign in to read
the full article

Forgot your password?
No account yet?
Sign up for free!

Create my pcr account

Join us for free and access thousands of articles from EuroIntervention, as well as presentations, videos, cases from PCRonline.com

Volume 20 Number 21
Nov 4, 2024
Volume 20 Number 21
View full issue


Key metrics

Suggested by Cory

Editorial

10.4244/EIJ-E-23-00052 Mar 18, 2024
Comparative preclinical assessment of drug-coated balloons: a blessing and a curse for clinical translation
Joner M and Wild L
free

10.4244/EIJV8I4A70 Aug 24, 2012
Comparison of two drug-eluting balloons: a report from the SCAAR registry
Bondesson P et al
free

May 17, 2011
From bench to Paccocath
Cremers B and Scheller B
free
Trending articles
166.7

Expert review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00690 May 15, 2022
Crush techniques for percutaneous coronary intervention of bifurcation lesions
Moroni F et al
free
92.45

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-20-01296 Aug 27, 2021
Management of cardiogenic shock
Thiele H et al
free
72.95

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00386 Feb 3, 2025
Mechanical circulatory support for complex, high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention
Ferro E et al
free
60.55

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00066 Apr 21, 2025
Management of complications after valvular interventions
Bansal A et al
free
58.3

Clinical research

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00344 Sep 18, 2023
Clinical outcomes of TAVI with the Myval balloon-expandable valve for non-calcified aortic regurgitation
Sanchez-Luna JP et al
free
33.9

CLINICAL RESEARCH

10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00381 Oct 11, 2017
Stent malapposition and the risk of stent thrombosis: mechanistic insights from an in vitro model
Foin N et al
free
33.65

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00606 Jan 1, 2024
Targeting inflammation in atherosclerosis: overview, strategy and directions
Waksman R et al
free
26

Expert Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00535 May 5, 2025
Catheter-based techniques for pulmonary embolism treatment
Costa F et al
X

The Official Journal of EuroPCR and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI)

EuroPCR EAPCI
PCR ESC
Impact factor: 7.6
2023 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2024)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2025 Europa Group - All rights reserved