Debate

DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-E-24-00072

Routine diagnosis of ANOCA/INOCA: pros and cons

Rocco Antonio Montone1, MD, PhD; Andrea Caffè2, MD; Keisuke Yasumura3, MD; Annapoorna Kini3, MD

Increasing awareness of angina or ischaemia with non-obstructive coronary arteries (ANOCA/INOCA) has expanded our knowledge of ischaemic heart disease, highlighting the importance of vasomotor disorders and microvascular dysfunction in symptomatic patients without stenoses in epicardial coronary arteries. ANOCA/INOCA encompasses a wide spectrum of conditions which require advanced diagnostic tools for precise endotyping. Emerging evidence suggests that the use of invasive functional assessments can help to identify specific mechanisms underlying myocardial ischaemia, leading to a more accurate diagnosis that enables specific treatments and – eventually – prognostic benefits. However, it should be noted that the evidence supporting routine functional assessments is limited, with guidelines recommending more selective approaches, due to considerations of procedural risks, high costs, and the lack of robust outcome data. Whether invasive functional diagnosis of ANOCA/INOCA should be adopted as a standard practice remains an area of uncertainty.

Pros

Rocco Antonio Montone, MD, PhD; Andrea Caffè, MD

A sizeable proportion (up to 50%) of patients undergoing coronary angiography due to suspected angina and/or detectable ischaemia have non-obstructed coronary arteries. In these patients, the role of coronary vasomotor...

Sign in to read
the full article

Forgot your password?
No account yet?
Sign up for free!

Create my pcr account

Join us for free and access thousands of articles from EuroIntervention, as well as presentations, videos, cases from PCRonline.com

Volume 21 Number 6
Mar 17, 2025
Volume 21 Number 6
View full issue


Key metrics

Suggested by Cory

Debate

10.4244/EIJ-E-23-00008 May 12, 2023
Invasive functional testing in the cath lab as a routine investigation in INOCA: pros and cons
De Bruyne B et al
free

Clinical Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00402 Feb 18, 2022
Principles and pitfalls in coronary vasomotor function testing
Feenstra R et al
free

Editorial

10.4244/EIJ-E-24-00011 Jun 3, 2024
The assessment of ANOCA: coming of age?
De Bruyne B and Mahendiran T
free

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00426 Dec 3, 2021
Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary artery disease
Lindahl B et al
free
Trending articles
200.45

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00089 Jun 11, 2021
Intracoronary optical coherence tomography: state of the art and future directions
Ali ZA et al
free
58.7

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00386 Feb 3, 2025
Mechanical circulatory support for complex, high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention
Ferro E et al
free
39.45

Clinical research

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00725 Nov 19, 2023
A systematic algorithm for large-bore arterial access closure after TAVI: the TAVI-MultiCLOSE study
Rosseel L et al
free
39.45

Original Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00725 Mar 18, 2024
A systematic algorithm for large-bore arterial access closure after TAVI: the TAVI-MultiCLOSE study
Rosseel L et al
free
22.55

CLINICAL RESEARCH

10.4244/EIJV12I5A93 Aug 5, 2016
Longer pre-hospital delays and higher mortality in women with STEMI: the e-MUST Registry
Benamer H et al
free
22.55

INTERVENTIONAL FLASHLIGHT

10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00774 Oct 19, 2018
Ultra-low contrast percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with severe chronic kidney disease
Azzalini L et al
free
X

The Official Journal of EuroPCR and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI)

EuroPCR EAPCI
PCR ESC
Impact factor: 7.6
2023 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2024)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2025 Europa Group - All rights reserved