Original Research

DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-25-00257

Photon-counting detector computed tomography for the assessment of coronary stents and in-stent restenosis

Doosup Shin1, MD; Rick H.J.A. Volleberg1,2, MD; Roosha Parikh1,3,4, MD; Christopher Chieh Yang Koo1,5, MBBS; Sarah Malik1,3, MD; Matthew Cannata1, BSc; Emma Caron1, BSc; Yasemin Ciftcikal1, BA; Koshiro Sakai6,7, MD, PhD; J. Jane Cao1,3, MD, MPH; Lu Chen1,3, MD; Fernando Sosa1, MS, MBA; Jonathan Weber1, MPH; Jaffar M. Khan1, MD, PhD; David J. Cohen1,8, MD, MSc; Jeffrey W. Moses1,8, MD; Niels van Royen2, MD, PhD; Carlos Collet6, MD, PhD; Richard A. Shlofmitz1, MD; Evan Shlofmitz1, DO; Allen Jeremias1, MD, MSc; Omar K. Khalique1,3,4, , MD; Ziad A. Ali1,4, MD, DPhil

Abstract

Background: Photon-counting detector computed tomography (PCD-CT) offers enhanced spatial resolution and reduced blooming artefacts, potentially improving the evaluation of stented coronary vessels.

Aims: This study aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of dual-source PCD-CT in detecting obstructive in-stent restenosis (ISR).

Methods: We identified consecutive patients with prior coronary stent implantation who underwent clinically indicated coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) with PCD-CT and subsequent invasive coronary angiography within 90 days between 2023 and 2024. Obstructive ISR (≥50% diameter stenosis) was determined by visual assessment of CCTA and invasive quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) in a blinded fashion. The diagnostic performance of CCTA for ISR was compared with that of QCA.

Results: A total of 283 stented lesions from 171 patients were included. Of these, only 3 lesions (1.1%) were deemed indeterminate by PCD-CT. Using invasive QCA as the reference standard, PCD-CT demonstrated a lesion-level sensitivity of 80.0%, specificity of 90.4%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 58.2%, negative predictive value (NPV) of 96.4%, and an overall diagnostic accuracy of 88.9% for detecting obstructive ISR. In a subgroup analysis according to the stent diameter (<3.00 mm [n=83] vs ≥3.00 mm [n=108]), there were no significant differences in sensitivity (87.5% vs 86.7%; p=1.00), specificity (93.3% vs 92.5%; p=1.00), PPV (58.3% vs 65.0%; p=1.00), NPV (98.6% vs 97.7%; p=1.00), or overall diagnostic accuracy (92.8% vs 91.7%; p=1.00), respectively.

Conclusions: PCD-CT demonstrated good diagnostic performance for evaluating obstructive ISR using QCA as the reference standard, regardless of stent diameter.

Sign in to read
the full article

Forgot your password?
No account yet?
Sign up for free!

Create my pcr account

Join us for free and access thousands of articles from EuroIntervention, as well as presentations, videos, cases from PCRonline.com

Volume 21 Number 19
Oct 6, 2025
Volume 21 Number 19
View full issue


Key metrics

Suggested by Cory

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-01034 Jun 3, 2022
Management of in-stent restenosis
Alfonso F et al
free

May 19, 2009
Noninvasive stent imaging with MSCT
Nieman K
free

Flashlight

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-01145 May 4, 2026
Natural history of coronary plaque redistribution after drug-coated balloon angioplasty
Dobrolińska M et al

Clinical research

10.4244/EIJ-D-20-00539 Aug 27, 2021
Predictors and outcomes of neoatherosclerosis in patients with in-stent restenosis
Nakamura D et al
free

EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH

10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00326 Feb 2, 2018
In vitro validation of coronary CT angiography for the evaluation of complex lesions
Collet C et al
free

Image – Interventional flashlight

10.4244/EIJ-D-20-00507 Aug 6, 2021
Optical coherence tomography and tailored treatment of in-stent restenosis
Jia H et al
free
Trending articles
334.8

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00904 Apr 1, 2022
Antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention
Angiolillo D et al
free
202.75

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00089 Jun 11, 2021
Intracoronary optical coherence tomography: state of the art and future directions
Ali ZA et al
free
47.45

NEW INNOVATION

10.4244/EIJ-D-15-00467 Feb 20, 2018
Design and principle of operation of the HeartMate PHP (percutaneous heart pump)
Van Mieghem NM et al
free
42.15

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-00896 Apr 6, 2026
Pretreatment with antiplatelet agents in patients undergoing coronary revascularisation
Kaur G et al
free
33.05

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-00874 Jun 1, 2026
TAVI and coronary interventions: indications, technical considerations, and clinical scenarios
Aquino Bruno H et al
free
27.6

Original Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-01370 May 21, 2026
Prognostic value of early haemodynamic valve deterioration after TAVI
Trimaille A et al
27.6

Original Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-01370 Jun 1, 2026
Prognostic value of early haemodynamic valve deterioration after TAVI
Trimaille A et al
19.5

Original Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-26-00032 May 15, 2026
Glucocorticoids to reduce permanent pacemaker implantation after TAVI: the GLUCO-TAVI randomised trial
Fuertes-Kenneally L et al
X

PCR
Impact factor: 9.2
2025 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2026)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2026 Europa Group - All rights reserved