DOI: 10.4244/EIJV7I2A31

Identification of high-risk aortic valve patients

Ines Florath1*, MD; Alexander Albert2; MD, PhD

The majority of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) studies aimed to recruit “inoperable” patients or patients at “too high risk for surgical AVR”; the operative risk was evaluated by clinical judgement in association with a more quantitative assessment based on scoring systems, especially the EuroSCORE1 or STS (Society of Thoracic Surgeons) risk score2. However, with the introduction of TAVI in Germany an unexpected decrease in the number of “surgical” aortic valve replacement (AVR) from 18,588 in 2008 to 17,344 in 2009 was observed, while previous to that, the number of AVR increased by approximately 200 patients per year3,4. It seems that patients previously considered for surgical AVR underwent TAVI.

The main problem in clinical trials as well as daily practice is currently the quantitative assessment of operative risk: although it is clear that the logistic EuroSCORE highly overestimates the operative risk in aortic valve patients5-8, in three of seven of the recently published larger TAVI studies, only the EuroSCORE was used9-11. In order to exemplify the performance of the EuroSCORE and STS risk score we compared the predicted mortality in several TAVI studies and in “high-risk” patients undergoing isolated AVR at our institute (Mediclin Heart Institute Lahr/Baden, Lahr, Germany) to the observed 30-day mortality12 in Figure 1: the logistic EuroSCORE overestimates the observed mortality about three times in TAVI and in surgical AVR patients. This miscalculation may lead to a relative overestimation of the operative risk after AVR and an overoptimistic interpretation of the short-term outcome after TAVI.

A main counter-argument against the currently available risk scores is that several important risk factors, e.g., porcelain aorta, frailty or, especially for transcatheter AVI, e.g., size of peripheral vessels and state of aortic annulus, are not included in present risk models13. However, the STS risk score predicted the operative mortality almost properly not only after surgical AVR but also after transcatheter AVI (Figure 1).

Figure 1. Comparison of mean observed and predicted 30-day mortality by logistic EuroSCORE (LES) and the STS-PROM (STS) from several TAVI studies and from data of patients undergoing isolated AVR in the authors institute (Mediclin Heart Institute Lahr/Baden, Lahr, Germany) with a EuroSCORE greater than 20 (LES>20) and with a STS-PROM greater than 10 (STS>10). TAVI (LES)9-11,14, TAVI (STS)14-16.

According to our experience in octogenarians undergoing AVR, the combination of the three simple risk factors: very high age, reduced ejection fraction and being underweight, already indicates an excessive operative risk (30-day mortality: 12.7%, STS: 9.6±6.2)8. Regarding also the 6-month mortality of 26% in these high-risk octogenarians after surgical AVR, the need for a less invasive therapy, possibly TAVI, becomes obvious.

Ideally, the current risk scores should be improved concerning additional risk factors and should consider the long-term benefit of an intervention. At the moment, we suggest the use of the STS risk score2, because the quantitative assessment of an interventional risk is necessary to identify high-risk patients and to enable a simple risk-adjusted comparison between different therapies and studies.

Conflict of interest statement

I. Florath has a research grant for stentless Freestyle® heart valve studies from Medtronic Inc., Duesseldorf, Germany. A. Albert has no conflict of interest to declare.


References

Volume 7 Number 2
Jun 30, 2011
Volume 7 Number 2
View full issue


Key metrics

Trending articles
309.93

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00695 Nov 19, 2021
Transcatheter treatment for tricuspid valve disease
Praz F et al
free
166.7

Expert review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00690 May 15, 2022
Crush techniques for percutaneous coronary intervention of bifurcation lesions
Moroni F et al
free
92.45

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-20-01296 Aug 27, 2021
Management of cardiogenic shock
Thiele H et al
free
76

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00840 Sep 2, 2024
Aortic regurgitation: from mechanisms to management
Baumbach A et al
free
72.85

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00386 Feb 3, 2025
Mechanical circulatory support for complex, high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention
Ferro E et al
free
58.3

Clinical research

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00344 Sep 18, 2023
Clinical outcomes of TAVI with the Myval balloon-expandable valve for non-calcified aortic regurgitation
Sanchez-Luna JP et al
free
56.65

Clinical research

10.4244/EIJ-D-20-01155 Oct 20, 2021
A deep learning algorithm for detecting acute myocardial infarction
Liu W et al
free
33.9

CLINICAL RESEARCH

10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00381 Oct 11, 2017
Stent malapposition and the risk of stent thrombosis: mechanistic insights from an in vitro model
Foin N et al
free
33.65

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00606 Jan 1, 2024
Targeting inflammation in atherosclerosis: overview, strategy and directions
Waksman R et al
free
X

The Official Journal of EuroPCR and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI)

EuroPCR EAPCI
PCR ESC
Impact factor: 7.6
2023 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2024)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2025 Europa Group - All rights reserved