Original Research

DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00951

Early outcomes of the novel Myval THV series compared to SAPIEN THV series and Evolut THV series in individuals with severe aortic stenosis

Niels van Royen1, MD, PhD; Ignacio J. Amat-Santos2,3, MD, PhD; Martin Hudec4, MD, PhD; Matjaz Bunc5, MD, PhD; Alexander Ijsselmuiden6,7, MD, PhD; Peep Laanmets8, MD; Daniel Unic9, MD, PhD; Béla Merkely10, MD; Renicus S. Hermanides11, MD, PhD; Vlasis Ninios12, MD; Marcin Protasiewicz13, MD, PhD; Benno J.W.M. Rensing14, MD, PhD; Pedro L. Martin15, MD, PhD; Fausto Feres16, MD; Manuel De Sousa17, MD, PhD; Eric Van Belle18, MD, PhD; Axel Linke19, MD; Alfonso Ielasi20, MD; Matteo Montorfano21,22, MD; Mark Webster23, MBChB; Konstantinos Toutouzas24, MD, PhD; Emmanuel Teiger25, MD, PhD; Francesco Bedogni26, MD; Michiel Voskuil27, MD, PhD; Manuel Pan28, MD, PhD; Oskar Angerås29,30, MD, PhD; Won-Keun Kim31,32, MD; Jürgen Rothe33,34, MD; Ivica Kristić35, MD, PhD; Vicente Peral36, MD, PhD; Ben J.L. Van den Branden6, MD; Dirk Westermann33, MD; Barbara Bellini22, MD; Mario Garcia-Gomez2,3, MD; Akihiro Tobe37, MD; Tsung-Ying Tsai37,38, MD; Scot Garg39,40, MD, PhD; Ashokkumar Thakkar41, PhD; Udita Chandra41, PhD; Marie-Claude Morice42,43, MD, PhD; Osama Soliman37, MD, PhD; Yoshinobu Onuma37,44, MD, PhD; Patrick W. Serruys37, MD, PhD; Andreas Baumbach45,46, MD, PhD

Abstract

Background: There are limited head-to-head randomised trials comparing the performance of different transcatheter heart valves (THVs).

Aims: We aimed to evaluate the non-inferiority of the balloon-expandable Myval THV series compared to the balloon-expandable SAPIEN THV series or the self-expanding Evolut THV series.

Methods: The LANDMARK trial randomised 768 patients in a 1:1 ratio, (Myval THV series [n=384] vs contemporary series with 50% SAPIEN THV series [n=192] and 50% Evolut THV series [n=192]). The non-inferiority of Myval over the SAPIEN or Evolut THV series in terms of the 30-day primary composite safety and effectiveness endpoint as per the third Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC-3) was tested in an intention-to-treat population with a predefined statistical power of 80% (1-sided alpha of 5%) for a non-inferiority margin of 10.44%.

Results: The Myval THV series achieved non-inferiority for the primary composite endpoint over the SAPIEN THV series (24.7% vs 24.1%, risk difference [95% confidence interval {CI}]: 0.6% [not applicable {NA} to 8.0]; p=0.0033) and the Evolut THV series (24.7% vs 30.0%, risk difference [95% CI]: –5.3% [NA to 2.5]; p<0.0001). The incidences of pacemaker implantation were comparable (Myval THV series: 15.0%, SAPIEN THV series: 17.3%, Evolut THV series: 16.8%). At 30 days, the mean pressure gradient and effective orifice area were significantly better with the Myval THV series compared to the SAPIEN THV series (p<0.0001) and better with the Evolut THV series than with the Myval THV series (p<0.0001). At 30 days, the proportion of moderate to severe prosthetic valve regurgitation was numerically higher with the Evolut THV series compared to the Myval THV series (7.4% vs 3.4%; p=0.06), while not significantly different between the Myval THV series and the SAPIEN THV series (3.4% vs 1.6%; p=0.32).

Conclusions: The Myval THV series is non-inferior to the SAPIEN THV series and the Evolut THV series in terms of the primary composite endpoint at 30 days. Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04275726; EudraCT number 2020-000,137-40.

Sign in to read
the full article

Forgot your password?
No account yet?
Sign up for free!

Create my pcr account

Join us for free and access thousands of articles from EuroIntervention, as well as presentations, videos, cases from PCRonline.com

Volume 21 Number 2
Jan 20, 2025
Volume 21 Number 2
View full issue


Key metrics

Suggested by Cory

EXPERT REVIEW

10.4244/EIJ-D-18-00544 Sep 7, 2018
Appraisal of key trials in aortic and mitral fields
Capranzano P et al
free

Clinical research

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00344 Sep 18, 2023
Clinical outcomes of TAVI with the Myval balloon-expandable valve for non-calcified aortic regurgitation
Sanchez-Luna JP et al
free

10.4244/EIJV15I15A236 Feb 7, 2020
Strengths and weaknesses of different types of TAVI study
De Backer O and Søndergaard L
free

AORTIC VALVE INTERVENTIONS

10.4244/EIJV12SYA12 Sep 18, 2016
Upcoming TAVI trials: rationale, design and impact on clinical practice
Capodanno D and Leon MB
free

10.4244/EIJV8I5A94 Sep 28, 2012
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: new developments and upcoming clinical trials
Bourantas C et al
free
Trending articles
311.63

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00695 Nov 19, 2021
Transcatheter treatment for tricuspid valve disease
Praz F et al
free
154.78

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00776 Apr 3, 2023
Computed tomographic angiography in coronary artery disease
Serruys PW et al
free
145.6

Expert review

10.4244/EIJ-D-20-00454 Oct 20, 2021
Transseptal puncture: procedural guidance, challenging situations and management of complications
Russo G et al
free
110.9

Clinical research

10.4244/EIJ-D-20-00130 Oct 9, 2020
Double-kissing culotte technique for coronary bifurcation stenting
Toth GG et al
free
77.75

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00840 Sep 2, 2024
Aortic regurgitation: from mechanisms to management
Baumbach A et al
free
43.65

Clinical research

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00590 Dec 4, 2023
Prognostic impact of cardiac damage staging classification in each aortic stenosis subtype undergoing TAVI
Nakase M et al
free
X

The Official Journal of EuroPCR and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI)

EuroPCR EAPCI
PCR ESC
Impact factor: 7.6
2023 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2024)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2025 Europa Group - All rights reserved