Original Research

DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00282

Outcomes of coronary intravascular lithotripsy for the treatment of calcified nodules: a pooled analysis of the Disrupt CAD studies

Ziad A. Ali1,2,3, MD, DPhil; Doosup Shin1, MD; Mandeep Singh1, BS; Sarah Malik1, MD; Koshiro Sakai1, MD, PhD; Benjamin Honton4, MD; Dean J. Kereiakes5, MD; Jonathan M. Hill6, MD; Shigeru Saito7, MD; Carlo Di Mario8, MD, PhD; Nieves Gonzalo9, MD, PhD; Robert F. Riley10, MD; Akiko Maehara1,2, MD; Mitsuaki Matsumura2, BS; Jason Hokama11, PhD; Nick E.J. West11, MD; Gregg W. Stone12, MD; Richard A. Shlofmitz1, MD

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Coronary intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) safely facilitates stent implantation in severely calcified lesions.

AIMS: This analysis sought to determine the relative impact of IVL on acute and long-term outcomes specifically in calcified nodules (CNs).

METHODS: Individual patient-level data (N=155) were pooled from the Disrupt CAD optical coherence tomography (OCT) substudies. Severely calcified lesions with and without CNs were compared by OCT for acute procedural results and for target lesion failure (TLF) at 2 years − a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and ischaemia-driven target lesion revascularisation.

Results: A CN was identified in 18.7% (29/155) of lesions. When comparing lesions with and without CNs, there were no significant differences in preprocedure minimal lumen area or diameter stenosis; however, the mean calcium angle and calcium volume were greater in CN lesions. Despite a higher calcium burden, the final minimal stent area (CN: 5.7 mm2 [interquartile range [IQR] 4.4, 8.3] vs non-CN: 5.7 mm2 [IQR 4.7, 7.2]; p=0.80) and stent expansion (CN: 79.3% [IQR 64.3, 87.0] vs 80.2% [IQR 68.9, 92.4]; p=0.30) were comparable between the two groups. In the CN group, the final stent area and expansion at CN sites were 7.6 mm2 (IQR 5.5, 8.5) and 89.7% (IQR 79.8, 102.5), respectively. The cumulative incidence of TLF at 2 years was 13.9% and 8.0% in the CN and non-CN groups, respectively (p=0.32).

CONCLUSIONS: Despite a greater calcium volume in CNs, IVL use was associated with comparable stent expansion and luminal gain in both CN and non-CN lesions. Further studies powered for clinical outcomes comparing different plaque modification techniques in this lesion subset are warranted.

Sign in to read
the full article

Forgot your password?
No account yet?
Sign up for free!

Create my pcr account

Join us for free and access thousands of articles from EuroIntervention, as well as presentations, videos, cases from PCRonline.com

Volume 20 Number 23
Dec 2, 2024
Volume 20 Number 23
View full issue


Key metrics

Suggested by Cory

Clinical research

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00545 Sep 20, 2022
Coronary lithotripsy for the treatment of underexpanded stents: the international; multicentre CRUNCH registry
Tovar Forero M et al
free

Expert review

10.4244/EIJ-D-18-01056 Oct 18, 2019
Intravascular lithotripsy for calcific coronary and peripheral artery stenoses
Dini C et al
free

Clinical Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00504 Mar 18, 2022
Prevalence, predictors, and outcomes of in-stent restenosis with calcified nodules
Tada T et al
free

Short report

10.4244/EIJ-D-19-01052 May 20, 2020
Intravascular lithotripsy for lesion preparation in patients with calcific distal left main disease
Cosgrove C et al
free

Image – Interventional flashlight

10.4244/EIJ-D-18-00780 May 20, 2019
Intravascular lithotripsy to treat a severely underexpanded coronary stent
Watkins S et al
free

Editorial

10.4244/EIJ-E-22-00053 Feb 20, 2023
Coronary calcification: you have to crack a few eggs to make an omelette
Sabaté M
free

Debate

10.4244/EIJ-E-23-00002 Jun 5, 2023
All calcified nodules are made equal and require the same approach: pros and cons
Guagliumi G et al
free

Image – Interventional flashlight

10.4244/EIJ-D-19-00268 Jul 17, 2020
Intravascular lithotripsy for recurrent restenosis caused by severe calcific neoatherosclerosis
Salazar C et al
free

Translational research

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00487 Dec 18, 2023
Intravascular laser lithotripsy for calcium fracture in human coronary arteries
Gruslova AB et al
free
Trending articles
225.68

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00426 Dec 3, 2021
Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary artery disease
Lindahl B et al
free
105.78

Expert consensus

10.4244/EIJ-E-22-00018 Dec 4, 2023
Definitions and Standardized Endpoints for Treatment of Coronary Bifurcations
Lunardi M et al
free
77.85

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00840 Sep 2, 2024
Aortic regurgitation: from mechanisms to management
Baumbach A et al
free
68.7

Clinical research

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00545 Sep 20, 2022
Coronary lithotripsy for the treatment of underexpanded stents: the international; multicentre CRUNCH registry
Tovar Forero M et al
free
47.8

NEW INNOVATION

10.4244/EIJ-D-15-00467 Feb 20, 2018
Design and principle of operation of the HeartMate PHP (percutaneous heart pump)
Van Mieghem NM et al
free
45.3

Clinical research

10.4244/EIJ-D-18-01126 Aug 29, 2019
New-generation mechanical circulatory support during high-risk PCI: a cross-sectional analysis
Ameloot K et al
free
X

The Official Journal of EuroPCR and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI)

EuroPCR EAPCI
PCR ESC
Impact factor: 7.6
2023 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2024)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2024 Europa Group - All rights reserved