Editorial

DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-E-24-00015

When can we discharge patients after chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention?

William L. Lombardi1, MD; Lorenzo Azzalini1, MD, MSc, PhD

Implementing same-day discharge (SDD) after elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is associated with important cost savings1 and might also improve patient flow through the hospital. SDD has been steadily growing in certain environments (e.g., approximately one-third of elective PCIs in the USA in 20172), in parallel with the adoption of radial access12. The introduction of SDD has not correlated with worse overall clinical outcomes12, indicating its safety in specific scenarios. There seems to be a large between-hospital variation in SDD rates12, suggesting the existence of logistical and clinical practice-related barriers to a homogeneous adoption of SDD.

Chronic total occlusion (CTO) PCI has witnessed a remarkable growth over the past decade. Implementing an SDD strategy after CTO PCI is appealing for the same reasons as after PCI in all-comers, yet its implementation is hampered by unique challenges, including higher use of femoral access, contrast volume, and risk of procedural complications.

Small single-centre studies from the USA3 and Greece4 recently reported on the feasibility of SDD after CTO PCI. SDD was adopted in 41.7%...

Sign in to read
the full article

Forgot your password?
No account yet?
Sign up for free!

Create my pcr account

Join us for free and access thousands of articles from EuroIntervention, as well as presentations, videos, cases from PCRonline.com

Volume 20 Number 10
May 20, 2024
Volume 20 Number 10
View full issue


Key metrics

Suggested by Cory

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00904 Apr 1, 2022
Antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention
Angiolillo D et al
free

Feb 21, 2011
Tools & Techniques: PCI for acute MI tips and tricks
Dudek D et al
free

CLINICAL RESEARCH

10.4244/EIJV11I14A315 Apr 8, 2016
Forward and back aspiration during ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a feasibility study
Farooq V et al
free

Editorial

10.4244/EIJ-E-23-00004 Mar 20, 2023
Revascularisation, periprocedural events and survival – and the survival of the randomised controlled trial
Lansky AJ and Ahmad Y
free
Trending articles
200.45

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00089 Jun 11, 2021
Intracoronary optical coherence tomography: state of the art and future directions
Ali ZA et al
free
154.43

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00776 Apr 3, 2023
Computed tomographic angiography in coronary artery disease
Serruys PW et al
free
92.95

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-20-01296 Aug 27, 2021
Management of cardiogenic shock
Thiele H et al
free
47.4

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00386 Feb 3, 2025
Mechanical circulatory support for complex, high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention
Ferro E et al
free
43.65

Clinical research

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00590 Dec 4, 2023
Prognostic impact of cardiac damage staging classification in each aortic stenosis subtype undergoing TAVI
Nakase M et al
free
36.5

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00448 Jan 15, 2024
Coronary spasm and vasomotor dysfunction as a cause of MINOCA
Yaker ZS et al
free
34.75

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00606 Jan 1, 2024
Targeting inflammation in atherosclerosis: overview, strategy and directions
Waksman R et al
free
X

The Official Journal of EuroPCR and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI)

EuroPCR EAPCI
PCR ESC
Impact factor: 7.6
2023 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2024)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2025 Europa Group - All rights reserved