DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00264

Reply: ORBITA-2 trial design and rationale: what causes angina after PCI?

Rasha Al-Lamee1, MD

We thank Milasinovic et al1 for their interest in our manuscript describing the design and rationale of the ORBITA-2 trial2. In response to their comments, post-PCI invasive physiology using fractional flow reserve and the instantaneous wave-free ratio is being measured systematically in all patients in the PCI arm, just as was performed in ORBITA, and will be reported in the primary manuscript.

Currently, we are not performing additional assessments of microvascular disease. We agree that in many patients with significant epicardial disease there may be coexistent microvascular disease. However, randomisation should ensure that the confounding effects of microvascular disease are equally distributed between the PCI and placebo groups. We hope that we will be able to perform a substudy assessing microvascular disease in a subset of the patients in ORBITA-2, subject to a successful ongoing funding application. We thank the authors for their comments.

Conflict of interest statement

The author reports speaker’s honoraria from Philips Volcano, Abbott Vascular, Menarini Pharmaceuticals and Medtronic.

Supplementary data

To read the full content of this article, please download the PDF.

Volume 18 Number 1
May 15, 2022
Volume 18 Number 1
View full issue


Key metrics

Suggested by Cory

10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00222 May 15, 2022
Letter: ORBITA-2 trial design and rationale: what causes angina after PCI?
Milasinovic D et al
free

10.4244/EIJV13I11A195 Dec 20, 2017
Fallout from the ORBITA trial – is angioplasty in a spin?
Byrne RA
free

10.4244/EIJV13I12A236 Dec 8, 2017
cFFR as an alternative to FFR: please do not contrast simplicity!
Leone AM et al
free

Clinical Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00176 Feb 18, 2022
Outcomes of quantitative flow ratio-based percutaneous coronary intervention in an all-comers study
Zhang R et al
free

Clinical research

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00185 Dec 17, 2021
Optical flow ratio for assessing stenting result and physiological significance of residual disease
Ding D et al
free
Trending articles
318.1

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00695 Nov 19, 2021
Transcatheter treatment for tricuspid valve disease
Praz F et al
free
116.75

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00066 Apr 21, 2025
Management of complications after valvular interventions
Bansal A et al
free
108.3

Viewpoint

10.4244/EIJ-E-22-00007 May 15, 2022
TAVI at 20: how a crazy idea led to a clinical revolution
Eltchaninoff H et al
free
91.6

Image – Interventional flashlight

10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00344 Aug 5, 2022
First dedicated transcatheter leaflet splitting device: the ShortCut device
Tchétché D et al
free
72.4

State-of-the-art

10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00627 Feb 6, 2023
Left atrial appendage occlusion
Holmes D et al
free
68.9

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00992 Sep 15, 2025
Antithrombotic therapy in complex percutaneous coronary intervention
Castiello D et al
free
60.65

Clinical research

10.4244/EIJ-D-20-01155 Oct 20, 2021
A deep learning algorithm for detecting acute myocardial infarction
Liu W et al
free
49.55

CLINICAL RESEARCH

10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00962 Apr 6, 2018
A new optical coherence tomography-based calcium scoring system to predict stent underexpansion
Fujino A et al
free
43.45

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00145 Sep 20, 2021
Robotics, imaging, and artificial intelligence in the catheterisation laboratory
Beyar R et al
free
X

PCR
Impact factor: 9.5
2024 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2025)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2025 Europa Group - All rights reserved