DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00264

Reply: ORBITA-2 trial design and rationale: what causes angina after PCI?

Rasha Al-Lamee1, MD

We thank Milasinovic et al1 for their interest in our manuscript describing the design and rationale of the ORBITA-2 trial2. In response to their comments, post-PCI invasive physiology using fractional flow reserve and the instantaneous wave-free ratio is being measured systematically in all patients in the PCI arm, just as was performed in ORBITA, and will be reported in the primary manuscript.

Currently, we are not performing additional assessments of microvascular disease. We agree that in many patients with significant epicardial disease there may be coexistent microvascular disease. However, randomisation should ensure that the confounding effects of microvascular disease are equally distributed between the PCI and placebo groups. We hope that we will be able to perform a substudy assessing microvascular disease in a subset of the patients in ORBITA-2, subject to a successful ongoing funding application. We thank the authors for their comments.

Conflict of interest statement

The author reports speaker’s honoraria from Philips Volcano, Abbott Vascular, Menarini Pharmaceuticals and Medtronic.

Supplementary data

To read the full content of this article, please download the PDF.

Volume 18 Number 1
May 15, 2022
Volume 18 Number 1
View full issue


Key metrics

Suggested by Cory

10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00222 May 15, 2022
Letter: ORBITA-2 trial design and rationale: what causes angina after PCI?
Milasinovic D et al
free

10.4244/EIJV13I11A195 Dec 20, 2017
Fallout from the ORBITA trial – is angioplasty in a spin?
Byrne RA
free

Editorial

10.4244/EIJ-D-26-00289 May 4, 2026
Expanding physiology beyond the wire: will 2026 be the defining year?
Campo G and Biscaglia S
free

10.4244/EIJV13I12A236 Dec 8, 2017
cFFR as an alternative to FFR: please do not contrast simplicity!
Leone AM et al
free

Clinical Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00176 Feb 18, 2022
Outcomes of quantitative flow ratio-based percutaneous coronary intervention in an all-comers study
Zhang R et al
free
Trending articles
334.7

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00904 Apr 1, 2022
Antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention
Angiolillo D et al
free
84.05

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00840 Sep 2, 2024
Aortic regurgitation: from mechanisms to management
Baumbach A et al
free
44.9

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-01346 May 4, 2026
Slow flow and no reflow after percutaneous coronary intervention
Brugaletta S et al
free
42.15

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-00896 Apr 6, 2026
Pretreatment with antiplatelet agents in patients undergoing coronary revascularisation
Kaur G et al
free
38.2

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00195 Apr 7, 2025
Percutaneous coronary intervention for calcified and resistant lesions
Pesarini G et al
free
32.7

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-00874 Jun 1, 2026
TAVI and coronary interventions: indications, technical considerations, and clinical scenarios
Aquino Bruno H et al
free
29.8

Original Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-26-00032 May 15, 2026
Glucocorticoids to reduce permanent pacemaker implantation after TAVI: the GLUCO-TAVI randomised trial
Fuertes-Kenneally L et al
29.2

Original Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-01370 May 21, 2026
Prognostic value of early haemodynamic valve deterioration after TAVI
Trimaille A et al
29.2

Original Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-01370 Jun 1, 2026
Prognostic value of early haemodynamic valve deterioration after TAVI
Trimaille A et al
X

PCR
Impact factor: 9.2
2025 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2026)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2026 Europa Group - All rights reserved