DOI:

Rationale and use of antiplatelet and antithrombotic drugs during cardiovascular interventions

Thomas Cuisset1*, MD; Harald Mudra2, MD; Oliver Muller3, MD PhD; Pierre Vogt3, MD; Anne Angelillo-Scherrer4, MD; Kurt Huber5, MD

Introduction

Recent European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Guidelines have extensively investigated antithrombotic therapy during percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI)1-3. However, based on their complexity and partial difference from existing ACC/AHA guidelines, it is sometimes difficult to follow them in individual decisions. Moreover, most of the recommendations are based on prospective randomised trials, which only partially reflect the “real world” situation. Meta-analyses and guideline-based registries might help to guide daily practice. With respect to cardiovascular interventions the combination of both anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapies is mandatory to prevent thrombosis, because activation of both platelets and the coagulation system contribute to thrombus formation. The choice, initiation and duration of antithrombotic strategies is based on the clinical setting (elective, acute or urgent intervention). To optimise efficacy of therapy and reduce the potential bleeding hazard both, ischaemic and bleeding risks, have to be evaluated on an individual basis. The present report aims to give practical solutions to handle antithrombotic therapy for patients undergoing PCI in various clinical conditions.

Non ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS)

See also: Algorithm of NSTE ACS management (Figure 1)

Figure 1. NSTE Acute Coronary Syndrome.

To find the optimal strategy the risk of ischaemic events and the bleeding risk of an individual patient have to be weighed against each other. Thereby, easy to use variables or scores should be preferred.

Assessment of patient risk:

– Higher ischaemic risk:

ST-segment changes, elevated troponin, diabetes, GRACE score >1089

– Higher bleeding risk:

Female, >75 years, bleeding history, GFR<30ml/min, femoral access

Pre-cath management

1. In very high risk patients

(e.g. Persistent Angina, Haemodynamic Instability, Refractory Arrhythmias)

Patients are immediately referred to the cathlab:

UFH 60 IU/kg i.v. bolus, then infusion until PCI with GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors (abciximab)

In patients with high bleeding risk: monotherapy with bivalirudin, 0.1 mg/kg i.v. bolus followed by an infusion of 0.25 mg/kg/hr

2. In medium-to-high risk patients (e.g. troponin-positive, recurrent angina, dynamic ST changes)

Primarily invasive strategy is planned <72h:

In patients <75 years

UFH 60 IU/kg i.v. bolus, then infusion (aPTT-controlled) until PCI

or enoxaparin 1 mg/kg s.c. twice daily until PCI

or fondaparinux 2.5 mg daily s.c. until PCI

In patients > 75 years

UFH 60 IU/kg i.v. bolus, then infusion (aPTT-controlled) until PCI

Fondaparinux 2.5 mg daily s.c.

In case of renal failure (GFR<30 ml/min)

UFH 60 IU/kg i.v. bolus, then infusion (aPTT-controlled) until PCI

3. In low-risk patients

Primarily conservative strategy is planned:

Fondaparinux 2.5 mg s.c. daily

or enoxaparin 1 mg/kg s.c. twice daily

or UFH 60 IU/kg i.v. bolus, then infusion (aPTT-controlled) until PCI

Management in the cathlab

Golden Rule:

Continue the initial therapy! (Don’t switch except after fondaparinux)

If under UFH: Continue perfusion, ACT measurement might be useful

Target range:

- 200-250 sec with GP IIb/IIIa-inhibitors

- 250-350 sec without GP IIb/IIIa-inhibitors

If under enoxaparin:

< 8h of last s.c. application: no additional bolus

within 8-12h of last s.c. application: add 0.30 mg/kg i.v. bolus

>12h of last s.c. application: 0.75 mg/kg i.v. bolus

If under bivalirudin: An additional i.v. bolus of 0.5 mg/kg and an increase of the infusion to 1.75 mg/kg/hour before PCI is performed

If under fondaparinux: UFH 50-100 IU/kg when angiography and PCI is performed

Specific points of interest

Prevention of bleeding

– Assessment of bleeding risk

– No crossover of antithrombotic therapy

– No overdosing of antithrombotic therapy

– Radial access should be the preferred option in high bleeding risk

– Stop anticoagulation after PCI unless a specific indication exists

– Selective downstream use of GP IIb/IIIa-inhibitors in NSTE ACS might be better than unselective upstream use

– A consensual bleeding risk score is highly warranted

Duration of dual antiplatelet therapy

– After bare metal stent (BMS) implantation in stable angina: one month

– After drug eluting stent (DES) implantation (all patients): one year

– After ACS (all patients independent of therapeutic strategy): one year

Golden rules to avoid premature discontinuation of antiplatelet therapy

– Avoid DES in patients not expected to comply with therapy

– Avoid DES if surgery is planned within 12 months

– Detailed information and education of the patient might prevent premature cessation of antiplatelet therapy

– Most surgical procedures can be performed under dual antiplatelet therapy with acceptable rate of bleeding: a multidisciplinary approach is required (cardiologist, anaesthesiologist, surgeon).

In surgical procedures with high bleeding risk:

– Stop clopidogrel five days before surgery and stay on ASA, unless high bleeding risk surgery

– The substitution of combined antiplatelet therapy with LMWH is ineffective and useless

– Restart clopidogrel as soon as possible with loading dose

– In very high risk patients (e.g. multivessel DES<1 years, left main stenting...), in whom cessation of antiplatelet therapy before surgery seems to be dangerous, it has been suggested to switch from clopidogrel five days before surgery to a short half-life antiplatelet agent, e.g. the GP IIb/IIIa-inhibitors tirofiban or eptifibatide and stop infusion of these agents four hours before surgery.

Patient under chronic anticoagulation

To avoid long-term triple antithrombotic therapy, BMS implantation or the use of pure balloon dilatation is preferred over the use of DES.

Antiplatelet therapy monitoring

– No consensual test system available

– No consensual definition of “non”– or “low” – response

– No large clinical evidence that tailored antiplatelet therapy improves clinical outcomes

– Monitoring of antiplatelet response by platelet function assays is used at present only in clinical research. Data are not strong enough to support the common use of the available assay systems in daily clinical practice.

Patients with aspirin hypersensitivity

If aspirin is highly required a “rapid desensitisation procedure” should be performed17

Heparin induced thrombocytopenia (HIT)

In patient with a history of HIT, neither UFH nor LMWH should not be used (cross reactivity). Bivalirudin is the best option in this case for elective PCI and ACS. Others options are argatroban, lepirudin and danaparoid.

Volume 4 Number 2
Aug 20, 2008
Volume 4 Number 2
View full issue


Key metrics

Suggested by Cory

Editorial

10.4244/EIJ-D-26-00453 Jul 6, 2026
AnchorMan versus Watchman 2.5: a randomised comparison in left atrial appendage closure
Garot P and Nielsen-Kudsk J
free

Editorial

10.4244/EIJ-E-26-00011 Jul 6, 2026
Comparing transcatheter aortic valves: time to look beyond simplistic categorisations
Blackman D and Maznyczka A
free

Original Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-26-00158 Jul 6, 2026
Prosthesis-patient mismatch with intra-annular self-expanding valves: an analysis of the PORTICO IDE trial
Fontana G et al

Research Correspondence

10.4244/EIJ-D-26-00315 Jul 6, 2026
Validation of the VARC-HBR consensus for defining high bleeding risk in TAVI
Singh M et al

Research Correspondence

10.4244/EIJ-D-26-00271 Jul 6, 2026
Outcomes of percutaneous mechanical aspiration in left-sided infective endocarditis
Lugo-Fagundo NS et al

Flashlight

10.4244/EIJ-D-26-00128 Jul 6, 2026
Concomitant transfemoral aortic and mitral valve replacement
Lianos I et al
Trending articles
335.05

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00904 Apr 1, 2022
Antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention
Angiolillo D et al
free
84.05

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00840 Sep 2, 2024
Aortic regurgitation: from mechanisms to management
Baumbach A et al
free
47.25

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-00874 Jun 1, 2026
TAVI and coronary interventions: indications, technical considerations, and clinical scenarios
Aquino Bruno H et al
free
45.5

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-01346 May 4, 2026
Slow flow and no reflow after percutaneous coronary intervention
Brugaletta S et al
free
38.2

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00195 Apr 7, 2025
Percutaneous coronary intervention for calcified and resistant lesions
Pesarini G et al
free
32.65

Original Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-26-00032 May 15, 2026
Glucocorticoids to reduce permanent pacemaker implantation after TAVI: the GLUCO-TAVI randomised trial
Fuertes-Kenneally L et al
29.2

Original Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-01370 May 21, 2026
Prognostic value of early haemodynamic valve deterioration after TAVI
Trimaille A et al
29.2

Original Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-01370 Jun 1, 2026
Prognostic value of early haemodynamic valve deterioration after TAVI
Trimaille A et al
X

PCR
Impact factor: 9.2
2025 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2026)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2026 Europa Group - All rights reserved