DOI:

Rationale and use of antiplatelet and antithrombotic drugs during cardiovascular interventions

Thomas Cuisset1*, MD; Harald Mudra2, MD; Oliver Muller3, MD PhD; Pierre Vogt3, MD; Anne Angelillo-Scherrer4, MD; Kurt Huber5, MD

Introduction

Recent European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Guidelines have extensively investigated antithrombotic therapy during percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI)1-3. However, based on their complexity and partial difference from existing ACC/AHA guidelines, it is sometimes difficult to follow them in individual decisions. Moreover, most of the recommendations are based on prospective randomised trials, which only partially reflect the “real world” situation. Meta-analyses and guideline-based registries might help to guide daily practice. With respect to cardiovascular interventions the combination of both anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapies is mandatory to prevent thrombosis, because activation of both platelets and the coagulation system contribute to thrombus formation. The choice, initiation and duration of antithrombotic strategies is based on the clinical setting (elective, acute or urgent intervention). To optimise efficacy of therapy and reduce the potential bleeding hazard both, ischaemic and bleeding risks, have to be evaluated on an individual basis. The present report aims to give practical solutions to handle antithrombotic therapy for patients undergoing PCI in various clinical conditions.

Non ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS)

See also: Algorithm of NSTE ACS management (Figure 1)

Figure 1. NSTE Acute Coronary Syndrome.

To find the optimal strategy the risk of ischaemic events and the bleeding risk of an individual patient have to be weighed against each other. Thereby, easy to use variables or scores should be preferred.

Assessment of patient risk:

– Higher ischaemic risk:

ST-segment changes, elevated troponin, diabetes, GRACE score >1089

– Higher bleeding risk:

Female, >75 years, bleeding history, GFR<30ml/min, femoral access

Pre-cath management

1. In very high risk patients

(e.g. Persistent Angina, Haemodynamic Instability, Refractory Arrhythmias)

Patients are immediately referred to the cathlab:

UFH 60 IU/kg i.v. bolus, then infusion until PCI with GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors (abciximab)

In patients with high bleeding risk: monotherapy with bivalirudin, 0.1 mg/kg i.v. bolus followed by an infusion of 0.25 mg/kg/hr

2. In medium-to-high risk patients (e.g. troponin-positive, recurrent angina, dynamic ST changes)

Primarily invasive strategy is planned <72h:

In patients <75 years

UFH 60 IU/kg i.v. bolus, then infusion (aPTT-controlled) until PCI

or enoxaparin 1 mg/kg s.c. twice daily until PCI

or fondaparinux 2.5 mg daily s.c. until PCI

In patients > 75 years

UFH 60 IU/kg i.v. bolus, then infusion (aPTT-controlled) until PCI

Fondaparinux 2.5 mg daily s.c.

In case of renal failure (GFR<30 ml/min)

UFH 60 IU/kg i.v. bolus, then infusion (aPTT-controlled) until PCI

3. In low-risk patients

Primarily conservative strategy is planned:

Fondaparinux 2.5 mg s.c. daily

or enoxaparin 1 mg/kg s.c. twice daily

or UFH 60 IU/kg i.v. bolus, then infusion (aPTT-controlled) until PCI

Management in the cathlab

Golden Rule:

Continue the initial therapy! (Don’t switch except after fondaparinux)

If under UFH: Continue perfusion, ACT measurement might be useful

Target range:

- 200-250 sec with GP IIb/IIIa-inhibitors

- 250-350 sec without GP IIb/IIIa-inhibitors

If under enoxaparin:

< 8h of last s.c. application: no additional bolus

within 8-12h of last s.c. application: add 0.30 mg/kg i.v. bolus

>12h of last s.c. application: 0.75 mg/kg i.v. bolus

If under bivalirudin: An additional i.v. bolus of 0.5 mg/kg and an increase of the infusion to 1.75 mg/kg/hour before PCI is performed

If under fondaparinux: UFH 50-100 IU/kg when angiography and PCI is performed

Specific points of interest

Prevention of bleeding

– Assessment of bleeding risk

– No crossover of antithrombotic therapy

– No overdosing of antithrombotic therapy

– Radial access should be the preferred option in high bleeding risk

– Stop anticoagulation after PCI unless a specific indication exists

– Selective downstream use of GP IIb/IIIa-inhibitors in NSTE ACS might be better than unselective upstream use

– A consensual bleeding risk score is highly warranted

Duration of dual antiplatelet therapy

– After bare metal stent (BMS) implantation in stable angina: one month

– After drug eluting stent (DES) implantation (all patients): one year

– After ACS (all patients independent of therapeutic strategy): one year

Golden rules to avoid premature discontinuation of antiplatelet therapy

– Avoid DES in patients not expected to comply with therapy

– Avoid DES if surgery is planned within 12 months

– Detailed information and education of the patient might prevent premature cessation of antiplatelet therapy

– Most surgical procedures can be performed under dual antiplatelet therapy with acceptable rate of bleeding: a multidisciplinary approach is required (cardiologist, anaesthesiologist, surgeon).

In surgical procedures with high bleeding risk:

– Stop clopidogrel five days before surgery and stay on ASA, unless high bleeding risk surgery

– The substitution of combined antiplatelet therapy with LMWH is ineffective and useless

– Restart clopidogrel as soon as possible with loading dose

– In very high risk patients (e.g. multivessel DES<1 years, left main stenting...), in whom cessation of antiplatelet therapy before surgery seems to be dangerous, it has been suggested to switch from clopidogrel five days before surgery to a short half-life antiplatelet agent, e.g. the GP IIb/IIIa-inhibitors tirofiban or eptifibatide and stop infusion of these agents four hours before surgery.

Patient under chronic anticoagulation

To avoid long-term triple antithrombotic therapy, BMS implantation or the use of pure balloon dilatation is preferred over the use of DES.

Antiplatelet therapy monitoring

– No consensual test system available

– No consensual definition of “non”– or “low” – response

– No large clinical evidence that tailored antiplatelet therapy improves clinical outcomes

– Monitoring of antiplatelet response by platelet function assays is used at present only in clinical research. Data are not strong enough to support the common use of the available assay systems in daily clinical practice.

Patients with aspirin hypersensitivity

If aspirin is highly required a “rapid desensitisation procedure” should be performed17

Heparin induced thrombocytopenia (HIT)

In patient with a history of HIT, neither UFH nor LMWH should not be used (cross reactivity). Bivalirudin is the best option in this case for elective PCI and ACS. Others options are argatroban, lepirudin and danaparoid.

Volume 4 Number 2
Aug 20, 2008
Volume 4 Number 2
View full issue


Key metrics

On the same subject

Editorial

10.4244/EIJ-E-24-00010 Apr 15, 2024
Timing of revascularisation in acute coronary syndromes with multivessel disease – two sides of the same coin
Stähli B and Stehli J
free

Editorial

10.4244/EIJ-E-24-00016 Apr 15, 2024
Can artificial intelligence help Heart Teams make decisions?
Koch V
free

Editorial

10.4244/EIJ-E-24-00006 Apr 15, 2024
The miracle of left ventricular recovery after transcatheter aortic valve implantation
Dauerman H and Lahoud R
free

Original Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00643 Apr 15, 2024
A study of ChatGPT in facilitating Heart Team decisions on severe aortic stenosis
Salihu A et al

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00836 Apr 15, 2024
Renal denervation in the management of hypertension
Lauder L et al
free
Trending articles
338.03

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00904 Apr 1, 2022
Antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention
Angiolillo D et al
free
284.93

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00695 Nov 19, 2021
Transcatheter treatment for tricuspid valve disease
Praz F et al
free
226.03

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00426 Dec 3, 2021
Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary artery disease
Lindahl B et al
free
209.5

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-01034 Jun 3, 2022
Management of in-stent restenosis
Alfonso F et al
free
168.4

Expert review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00690 May 15, 2022
Crush techniques for percutaneous coronary intervention of bifurcation lesions
Moroni F et al
free
150.28

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00776 Apr 3, 2023
Computed tomographic angiography in coronary artery disease
Serruys PW et al
free
118

Translational research

10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00718 Jun 5, 2023
Preclinical evaluation of the degradation kinetics of third-generation resorbable magnesium scaffolds
Seguchi M et al
X

The Official Journal of EuroPCR and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI)

EuroPCR EAPCI
PCR ESC
Impact factor: 6.2
2022 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2023)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2024 Europa Group - All rights reserved