Image – Interventional flashlight

DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-19-00826

ACURATE neo valve perforation after valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Andreas Rück1, MD, PhD; Magnus Settergren1, MD, PhD; Nawzad Saleh1, MD, PhD; Dinos Verouhis1, MD, PhD

Figure 1. Possible cause of perforated ACURATE neo valve. A) Fluoroscopy after valve-in-valve TAVI using the ACURATE neo inside a Biocor surgical bioprosthesis. Red arrow showing the same area as in panels B and C. B) Ex vivo image showing (red arrow) proximity of the upper edge of the stent post of the Biocor (outside) and the ACURATE neo prosthesis. Image courtesy of Dr Vinayat Bapat and UBQO Limited, London, UK. C) The explanted ACURATE neo, with a hole under the stent post between the right and left cusps (red arrow).

In 2001, a 61-year-old male was operated and a 25 mm Biocor™ (St. Jude Medical, St. Paul, MN, USA) aortic bioprosthesis was implanted. In 2017, the patient developed dyspnoea. Echocardiography revealed severe transvalvular regurgitation.

In January 2018, a transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) valve-in-valve procedure was performed using a 23 mm ACURATE neo™ prosthesis (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, USA) (Figure 1A). The prosthesis was post-dilated with a 22 mm balloon. Postoperative and 30-day echocardiography was unremarkable.

In August 2018, the patient reported exertional dyspnoea. Echocardiography showed severe paravalvular and transvalvular aortic regurgitation. There were no signs of infection. Both prostheses were explanted and a PERIMOUNT Magna Ease 23 mm bioprosthesis (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA, USA) was successfully implanted. Recovery was uneventful.

The ACURATE neo TAVI prosthesis has a triangular area under each stent post which is covered with porcine pericardium but not protected by metal, possibly a weak spot. It was noticed that the stent posts of the Biocor prosthesis and the ACURATE neo were aligned (Figure 1B), putting the weak spot in contact with the top of the surgical bioprosthesis’ stent posts, and causing a hole at this location by abrasion (Figure 1C).

This mechanism of prosthesis failure may indicate that the ACURATE neo prosthesis should be used with caution in valve-in-valve procedures (Moving image 1),1.

Conflict of interest statement

A. Rück has received lecture honoraria, research support and proctor fees from Boston Scientific and Edwards Lifesciences. M. Settergren has received lecture honoraria and proctor fees from Abbott, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, W.L. Gore and Edwards Lifesciences. N. Saleh has received lecture honoraria and proctor fees from Boston Scientific. The other author has no conflicts of interest to declare.

Supplementary data

To read the full content of this article, please download the PDF.

Moving image 1. Location of the perforation in the ACURATE neo prosthesis in the weak spot just below the stent post.

Volume 16 Number 7
Sep 18, 2020
Volume 16 Number 7
View full issue


Key metrics

Suggested by Cory

Research correspondence

10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00740 Apr 24, 2023
Procedural considerations for transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve implantation in a degenerated ACURATE neo prosthesis
Vanhaverbeke M et al
free

EXPERT REVIEW

10.4244/EIJ-D-18-00667 Sep 7, 2018
Novel strategies in aortic valve-in-valve therapy including bioprosthetic valve fracture and BASILICA
Dvir D et al
free

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-01050 Jul 15, 2024
Durability of transcatheter aortic valve implantation
Ternacle J et al
free

10.4244/EIJV7I1A25 May 17, 2011
How should I treat acute valve regurgitation?
Schultz C et al
free

AORTIC VALVE INTERVENTIONS

10.4244/EIJV12SYA8 Sep 18, 2016
Late degeneration of transcatheter aortic valves: pathogenesis and management
Barbanti M and Tamburino C
free

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00157 Oct 20, 2021
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in degenerated surgical aortic valves
Tarantini G et al
free
Trending articles
335.05

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00904 Apr 1, 2022
Antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention
Angiolillo D et al
free
84.05

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00840 Sep 2, 2024
Aortic regurgitation: from mechanisms to management
Baumbach A et al
free
49.35

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-00874 Jun 1, 2026
TAVI and coronary interventions: indications, technical considerations, and clinical scenarios
Aquino Bruno H et al
free
45.65

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-01346 May 4, 2026
Slow flow and no reflow after percutaneous coronary intervention
Brugaletta S et al
free
38.2

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00195 Apr 7, 2025
Percutaneous coronary intervention for calcified and resistant lesions
Pesarini G et al
free
33.9

Original Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-26-00032 May 15, 2026
Glucocorticoids to reduce permanent pacemaker implantation after TAVI: the GLUCO-TAVI randomised trial
Fuertes-Kenneally L et al
X

PCR
Impact factor: 9.2
2025 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2026)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2026 Europa Group - All rights reserved