Letter to the editor

DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-25-00463

Letter: When gradients diverge: integrating invasive assessment into post-TAVI surveillance

Ioannis Skalidis1, MD, PhD; Stephane Cook2, MD; Philippe Garot1, MD; Mariama Akodad1, MD, PhD

The assessment of transvalvular gradients remains a cornerstone of evaluating valve performance after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). However, the clinical interpretation of invasive versus echocardiographic measurements continues to pose challenges, particularly when discordance arises. In this context, the recent study by van den Dorpel et al offers valuable insights by addressing the prognostic significance of invasive versus echocardiography-derived aortic gradients after TAVI1. Their findings – that only invasively measured gradients independently predicted mortality at 30 days, 1 year, and 2 years – offer a compelling case for re-evaluating how postprocedural valve function is assessed in clinical practice.

This divergence between invasive and echocardiographic gradients raises an important question: are these modalities truly interchangeable in routine post-TAVI evaluation? If invasive gradients offer stronger prognostic value, should they play a larger role in guiding follow-up or therapeutic decision-making, particularly when echocardiographic findings are borderline or discordant?

The consistent overestimation of gradients by echocardiography – especially in balloon-expandable valves, smaller annuli, or patients with a high ejection fraction – also warrants closer examination. Could these discrepancies be attributed solely to technical factors, such...

Sign in to read
the full article

Forgot your password?
No account yet?
Sign up for free!

Create my pcr account

Join us for free and access thousands of articles from EuroIntervention, as well as presentations, videos, cases from PCRonline.com

Volume 21 Number 17
Sep 1, 2025
Volume 21 Number 17
View full issue


Key metrics

Suggested by Cory

Original Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00341 Apr 21, 2025
Prognostic value of invasive versus echocardiography-derived aortic gradient in patients undergoing TAVI
van den Dorpel M et al
free

Editorial

10.4244/EIJ-E-24-00065 Apr 21, 2025
From invasive gradients to pressure recovery: rethinking long-standing paradigms
Joner M and Mylotte D
free

10.4244/EIJV11I10A220 Feb 19, 2016
Accurate procedural assessment of AR – critical for successful TAVI
Kapadia S and Tuzcu ME
free
Trending articles
318.1

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00695 Nov 19, 2021
Transcatheter treatment for tricuspid valve disease
Praz F et al
free
116.75

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00066 Apr 21, 2025
Management of complications after valvular interventions
Bansal A et al
free
108.3

Viewpoint

10.4244/EIJ-E-22-00007 May 15, 2022
TAVI at 20: how a crazy idea led to a clinical revolution
Eltchaninoff H et al
free
91.6

Image – Interventional flashlight

10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00344 Aug 5, 2022
First dedicated transcatheter leaflet splitting device: the ShortCut device
Tchétché D et al
free
72.4

State-of-the-art

10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00627 Feb 6, 2023
Left atrial appendage occlusion
Holmes D et al
free
68.9

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00992 Sep 15, 2025
Antithrombotic therapy in complex percutaneous coronary intervention
Castiello D et al
free
60.65

Clinical research

10.4244/EIJ-D-20-01155 Oct 20, 2021
A deep learning algorithm for detecting acute myocardial infarction
Liu W et al
free
49.55

CLINICAL RESEARCH

10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00962 Apr 6, 2018
A new optical coherence tomography-based calcium scoring system to predict stent underexpansion
Fujino A et al
free
43.45

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00145 Sep 20, 2021
Robotics, imaging, and artificial intelligence in the catheterisation laboratory
Beyar R et al
free
X

PCR
Impact factor: 9.5
2024 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2025)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2025 Europa Group - All rights reserved